10/13/2020

Moon landing - The greatest hoax of the century crumbling under the light of exposure

The above picture provided by the NASA was the most convincing proof that man set foot on the moon when American astronaut Armstrong claimed to have landed on the moon. This was followed furiously over the next couple of years by another 7 or 8 missions and more American astronauts landing on the moon. The world gulped down every information and pictures provided by the Americans as proof of this scientific breakthrough and a historical event for humankind. 

Today, many doubts have been raised as to the truth of this American achievement or hoax of the century. After having a cakewalk on the moon like child's play, the American suddenly abandoned all missions to the moon and as good as scrapped the whole moon project forever. Never were they able to go to the moon again and citing that they have lost the technology to do so. Even the blueprints were all lost.

The poor Americans were so pathetic that they could not produce any rocket to take them even to the International Space Station that is a fraction of the distance to the moon and have to depend on Russian rockets to give them a lift, a helping hand to get to the Space Station.

The above picture that was the ultimate proof of the moon landing, is also the ultimate proof that the Americans had not been there, that it was all a hoax. The surface of the moon is dry and covered with loose sand or dust. How on earth could a cake of mud appeared on the moon's surface with a perfect foot print on it? And why there was this cake of mud in nowhere and surrounded by loose and dry moon crust? How could this be possible, be true? A piece of mud suddenly appeared on the moon surface with a footprint made on it? If there is mud on the moon, there will be water and life forms!

Below is the latest attempt by the Americans, after giving up on NASA, to seek the private sector to help them fly their astronauts, not to the moon, but to the Space Station. And they are still having difficulties trying to do it. Below are a few paragraphs from an article in Yahoo News.

 

SpaceX's next astronaut launch for NASA won't fly on Halloween after all.

The upcoming Crew-1 mission, which will send four astronauts to the International Space Station, had been scheduled to lift off atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket on Oct. 31. But the launch will now occur no sooner than early to mid-November, NASA officials announced today (Oct. 10).

The delay will provide "additional time for SpaceX to complete hardware testing and data reviews as the company evaluates off-nominal behavior of Falcon 9 first stage engine gas generators observed during a recent non-NASA mission launch attempt," NASA officials wrote in an update today.

That recent attempt was presumably the attempted liftoff of the GPS III SV04 satellite for the U.S. Space Force, which was aborted on Oct. 2 with just two seconds left on the countdown clock. The abort was caused by an "unexpected pressure rise in the turbomachinery gas generator" in the Falcon 9's first stage, SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk explained via Twitter on that same day.

Crew-1 will use a different Falcon 9, of course, but NASA wants to make sure that all possible issues with the rocket are fully understood before putting astronauts atop it again....

16 comments:

  1. If they did land on the moon before 1970 with that kind of technology, by now humans will have a space station at the moon where people can just come and go like taking a bus to orchard road.

    Interestingly, all of the astros who supposedly "landed" on the moon flatly refused to swear on the Bible that they did so, I wonder why

    ReplyDelete
  2. They treated the whole world like fools.

    ReplyDelete

  3. As well as producing four films, Sibrel approached several astronauts from the 1969 Apollo missions and demanded they swear on The Bible.
    Promoted Story

    In one exchange with Neil Armstrong, he asked: “Why don’t you put your hand on Tte Bible and swear to god you walked on the Moon?”

    The legendary astronaut, the first man to walk on the Moon on the mission, responded: “Knowing you, that’s probably a fake Bible.

    Buzz Aldrin responded in a different interview: “You’re talking to the wrong guy, why don’t you talk to the administrator of NASA? We’re passengers, we’re guys going on a flight.”

    In another fiery exchange, Sibrel branded Aldrin a “coward” and a “liar” before the astronaut punched him in the face.

    John Young, from the 1969 Apollo 10 mission, later told Sibrel: “I’m going to give you the opportunity to get knocked out if you don’t leave me alone.”

    Sibrel earlier told Daily Star Online that rockets designed in the 1960s would not have been able to resist the deadly radiation belt en-route to the Moon.

    ReplyDelete
  4. CIA has a special department dealing with false-flag events creation and another department specialising in disguise and deception. These two departments work hand-in-gloves with their covert operations and psychological operations departments to control the naratives for all American main news media and to project what they want the world to believe.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The foot print is so fake. How can there be such a strong Imprint like someone stepping on a muddy surface? Don't forget the weightlessness on the moon due to lack of gravity.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Australia on Tuesday called for China to clarify whether restrictions have been placed on the import of Australian coal, a move that would deal a serious blow to the country's already struggling economy.

    Trade Minister Simon Birmingham said he had asked via diplomatic channels whether China had instructed its companies to stop buying Australian coal -- a business worth around US$10 billion a year -- as political punishment with relations between the two increasingly souring....A ban on Australian coal could have serious implications for the country's resource-dependent economy, which is already in its first recession in almost 30 years.

    It would also be a blow to Australia's conservative government, which has swatted aside environmental concerns to heavily promote the faltering coal industry in order to safeguard political support in key parts of the country.

    Australian ministers have said they struggle to make contact with their Chinese counterparts, as Beijing has put relations into deep freeze.

    Their ties have soured considerably as China has become more aggressive in pursuing its interests overseas. Yahoo News

    Hahahaha, stupid Australians blaming Chinese aggression for this deep freeze when it was the Australians that were poking China in the eyes. Serve you right assholes!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rb u are right. The Australian always carry USA balls though the American did not even ask them to do what they did. Really assholes but I do miss the blondes with large melons there I enjoyed there in my younger days

      Delete
    2. Good job China. Oz keeps China out of all other investments but gets paranoid when China stops or reduce buying their primary produce and commodities. The mother of all would be iron ore-worth $130B a ywar. The Ozzies are still smug by bragging iron ore is their Trump card (pun intended). Once China has the alternative suppliers,and soon, Oz would never get out of recession for a long long time. They are aiming India as big trade partner replacing China HILARIOUS!

      Delete
  7. This small white country still pretending that it is a big power wanting to fuck around with China.

    China should stop trading with them and see all the big investments in heavy equipment in the mining industries go to waste and the owners going bankrupt and begging for mercy, and the workers go jobless.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why China Is Stopping Coal Import From Australia and Elsewhere

    China is actually cutting down the dependence on coal (and gas and oil) because of air pollution and energy security. Even in China itself, coal-mining is now being discouraged and reduced.

    China is embarking on clean 'renewable' energy, such as biofuel, biomass, biogas, geothermal, hydropower, solar energy, tidal power, wave power and others.

    China is the world's leading country in electricity production from renewable energy sources, with over double the generation of the second-ranking country, the United States. By the end of 2018, the country had a total capacity of 728 GW of renewable power, mainly from hydroelectric and wind power.

    China's renewable energy sector is growing faster than its fossil fuels and nuclear power capacity.

    Although China currently has the world's largest installed capacity of hydro, solar and wind power, its energy needs are so large that in 2015 renewable sources provided only 24% of its electricity generation, with most of the remainder provided by coal power plants.

    In 2017, renewable energy comprised 36.6% of China's total installed electric power capacity, and 26.4% of total power generation, the vast majority from hydroelectric sources. Nevertheless, the share of renewable sources in the energy mix had been gradually and steadily rising in recent years.

    China sees renewables as a source of energy security and not just only to reduce carbon emission.

    China's Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Air Pollution issued by China's State Council in September 2013, illustrates the government's desire to increase the share of renewables in China's energy mix.

    Unlike oil, coal and gas, the supplies of which are finite and subject to geopolitical tensions, renewable energy systems can be built and used wherever there is sufficient water, wind, and sun.

    As Chinese renewable energy production has grown, the costs of renewable energy technologies have dropped dramatically. Innovation has helped, but the main driver of reduced costs has been market expansion.

    From 2005 to 2014, production of solar cells in China has expanded 100-fold.

    In 2015, China became the world's largest producer of photovoltaic power, with 43 GW of total installed capacity.

    However, China is not expected to achieve grid parity (when an alternate source of energy is as cheap or cheaper than power purchased from the grid) until 2022/2023.

    In 2017, investments in renewable energy amounted to US$279.8 billion worldwide, with China accounting for US$126.6 billion or 45% of the global investments

    The silly Aussies' Anti-China aggressive actions in recent years have encourage China to move faster in her development and progress in the production of renewable energy.

    Thank you Australia and USA for spurring the Chinese people's resolve to be better and better in whatever endeavours we do.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It is very obvious the moon landing is FAKE NEWS. If you listened to the comms between Neil Armstring and Houston on 21July 1969, you can hear clearly the conversation has ZERO LATENCY (delay). Today, even with fibre optics, we can hear news anchors in studio chatting with on site reporters, very often there is a moment pause due to transmission delay and out of sync. Hey, the moon is 30,000 times further from studio then the distance between Timbuktu and Houston... why there is no latency comms delay of the audio clips?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yew die.
    I die.
    Lee Hsien Loong die.
    Everybody die.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope...there is One that lives as if is immortal or like eternity its P...A...P (code name GOD)

      Delete
  11. Anon 2.46

    The problem is that China needs the raw materials from that little puppet United States of America in the East.

    ReplyDelete
  12. When they admitted unashamedly that they 'lie, cheat and steal' believe them.

    They lied about Iraq, didn't they?

    They stole the country from the Natives didn't they?

    They cheated when they did not go to the moon, by making a blockbuster of a moon landing, inside a Hollywood studio, all to show the world that they are ahead of the USSR didn't they?

    What else have the world been duped besides those above.

    Many believe that 911 was an inside job because so many things did not fit the whole picture. Some hijackers were later discovered to be still alive living elsewhere. A middle eastern passport, purported to belong to one hijacker, survived the inferno, while the steel structure of the building melted from extreme temperatures that jet fuel could not be the cause. Why were the hijack planes not intercepted and shot down? They gave the excuse that a military exercise was ongoing and all fighter planes were ordered to stand down. How coincidental indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  13. By the way, is there an American Navy Base in Singapore?

    Why are Singapore Arm Forces having manoeuvre in Australia?



    ReplyDelete