Which clearly indicates that all these bodies like the UN, ICC, ICJ, IMF, WHO and WTO were all bodies set up by the Anglo-Saxon Whites as tools to ensure that the US hegemony is not threatened. It is just like supporting warships protecting an aircraft carrier to ensure it is not vulnerable.
Must the world be made to just cater to trade conditions dictated by the USA and the West? Must Global South countries be made to buy expensive goods shafted down their throats by the USA and the Europeans, instead of cheaper products from China in order to be considered right?
What is considered sustainable? Whether it is sustainable for China or not is not for the WTO to worry about. China is opening up more trade with Africa, now with zero tariffs for African nations, as the continent develops with aid from China. This is going to grow the pie and China's trade surplus will even be higher. How is this interpreted as unsustainable. It is unsustainable when the USA and its allies cannot compete. But it is a win-win situation for Africa and China and is making the USA and its allies red-eyed and extremely jealous. They will create all kinds of reasons to make sure China must be stopped by hook or by crook, not by reason and reality.
Anonymous
The propaganda machine of the West is very dangerous and all encompassing. Brian Belectic on his site 'The New Atlas' said that the USA and the West have the most dangerous weapon - control of the propaganda media. And they have never refrained from using it to fulfil their sick agenda.
ReplyDeleteThere is now a new mantra about 'war crimes' committed by the Myanmar Military Regime. Every country trying to stabilize internal civil unrest with crackdown on CIA inspired terrorism and insurrection is being condemned as committing war crimes. Fortunately, in Hong Kong and Xinjiang, the Chinese military did not intervene during the unrest instigated by the CIA, otherwise Xi and his other leaders would be accused of 'war crimes' as well, lol.
But the illegal war in Iraq, based on fabricated evidence by the USA and UK was not considered a 'war crime' with millions killed for no real reason. The UN, obviously complicit in the atrocities by giving the go ahead, was equally incriminated. Which is why it does not push to highlight the 'war crimes' committed by the USA, UK and those countries having blood on their hands by participating as the 'Coalition of the Willing'. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Magdelene Albright, Tony Blair and military leaders of all countries involved were all 'war criminals' like Adolf Hitler and Military leaders of Japan during WW2. Ironically, only the leaders of Germany and Japan were punished, but not the leaders of the illegal Iraq War. Where is justice being served.
Having said that, what about Trump and his administration being complicit in the genocide in Gaza by providing the weapons, together with Netanyahu. They will almost certainly get away with murder, while the rest of the world are being told to go against the Myanmar Government because they do not toe the line by going against the USA involvement via the CIA. 'War crime' is the only avenue opened to the USA to start another war front to seize Myanmar's rich resources and provide the USA a base closer to China with a long border, just like in Ukraine against Russia.