The USA would very much like to create animosity between Iran and Saudi Arabia. There are obvious reasons.
Any
animosity between Iran and Saudi Arabia will allow the USA to control
the Saudis with more weapons support to fight the Houthis, which is
supported by Iran. Any co-operation between Iran and Saudi Arabia will
stop the Houthis fighting the Saudis, which is bad for weapon sales to
the Kingdom.
By the way, the USA professes to be against
supporting Dictatorships, but Saudi Arabia is a dictatorship true and
true. Yet the USA deals with Saudi Arabia like any other democracy.
Hypocrisy?
Any differences existing between Iran and Saudi Arabia
will also mean these two Middle East powers have different approaches
to Israel, which will otherwise largely be left alone with the Iranian
and Israelis immersed in their geopolitical differences. As the saying
goes, any enemy of my enemy is my friend.
I do not expect the
Saudis to completely change its loyalty towards the USA and migrate
towards BRICS. The chips are too high. As I said before, the USA has an
'iron clad' hold on the Kingdom, with the Saudi Royals having
substantial assets in the USA and Europe. That hold is the same as what
Mickey Marcos is dealing with. You are either with the US or against the
US. For MBS, the stakes are even higher.
Anonymous
Hear what Nury Vittachi, on his site 'Fridayeveryday', have to say about the USA and MSM accusing China of interfering with the US coming election. He hit the nail on the head.
ReplyDeleteWhat exactly are the USA and MSM accusing China of interfering all about? They dare not mention which side China is supporting and have not focused on any sensible reasons in support, just only using this occasion to pile on more nonsensical accusations against China. Which side is China supporting is not disclosed, and just fabricating the interference narrative for propaganda's sake. Any juvenile, and possibly kids too, will understand that interference in an election context means trying to support one side against the other. Not in this case, where a complete blank is left for one to guess what they are talking and accusing China about. Just blindly barking up the wrong tree is all clear and simple.
China is not interested in who wins the USA election. Both candidates are a Hobson's Choice as far as China is concern, and in fact for the rest of the Global South as well. In the context of the accusations, it looks like they are saying that China wants both sides to win, which is not possible. Why would China waste time to support both sides to win if that is what they are saying, which is a no brainer that only the USA and Western MSM could conjure up.
As Nury said, any of the two candidates winning is a big loss for humanity.
What does China care when it is 'garbage in and garbage out'? After all, China still has to deal with garbage, right?
DeleteEverybody seems to be accused of interfering with USA elections over the years, even Iran now. This is a 'red herring' still being used today but is getting stale and hardly effective. Four years of trying to uncover Russian interference with the 2016 election ended up as an empty wild goose chase. The USA will have to come up with a more innovative and persuasive narrative and I think it is running out of barrel bottoms to scrape. It is still stuck with Russian and Chinese interference. Soon, India will also be dragged over the coals if what is happening is any indication.
Delete'In the past, the 'red herring' was all about communism trying to destroy democracy and the voters fell for the fabricated fear mongering. This narrative resulted in the Vietnam War, the domino effect they call it, that if Vietnam falls, the whole of South-East Asia will go the communist way. Well, South Vietnam did fall, and what were the North Vietnamese doing by not expanding communism southwards? It was more an attempt to regain hegemony over the countries in Indochina, which the French failed to retain. It was democracy trying to demolish communism instead of the other way round.
For several years the narrative then focused towards fighting terrorism. More like a master terrorist fighting wannabe terrorists to show it is on the right side. Anyone fighting against USA's interest is branded a terrorist. The USA has no lack of terrorist to fight for several long years.
The USA had been trying to promote democracy in Iraq and look what happens to the country. Afghanistan was thought to be left to go downhill with the defeat of the USA but look what is happening to the country. Things are working without the USA fermenting gloom and inviting doom.
Hi Anon 9.45
ReplyDeleteThe Bananas of Asia especially Sinking Land is so engrossed in the UAss Errections.
Why must looked to the stupid UAss?
UAss is going to collaspse soon.
Look to China man!
UAss sneezes and you have colds ah?
Worse COVID 20!
After Nov 5th or 7th I can bet you all whoever wins shall have riots!
Both sides are the same Scoundrols
Karmas at last!
They are getting ready to blame Russia, China or Iran for any riots, LOL. No shit!
Deletehttps://vt.tiktok.com/ZSjMS3kg7/
ReplyDeleteJust see this Confession by an American under his four year as President.
Cannot imagined the scenario after the election.
Anyone into the White House shall be chaos all over.
Going not to waste their purchases of arsenals to train on each other.
M.O.T.soon
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/watch/us-election-concerns-trump-may-discredit-results-if-it-doesnt-go-his-way-4721706
DeleteThis Dotard Mental Rascal shall instigate Riorts of he loses.
If our man in white loose the coming election, am sure they will said it because China interfered. They will then use the foreign interfer law to claim election invalid.
ReplyDelete