9/13/2023

Sino India border claims What is the truth?

 What was the basis for India to claim lands at the Sino India border, ie Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh? There was no India until the British gave independence to the land they stole from China and the whole of the sub Indian continent in 1947. Before 1947, for more than 300 years, the land in the Indian sub continent were loose states of various maharajahs and remnants of ancient empires. There was no border between China and a non existing India. There was no India to talk about. 

The Brits came, grabbed all the land and clobbered them together as part of the British colony. The land included those at the present disputed Sino Indian borders that belonged to Qing Dynasty/Republic of China, now called the PRC. The Qing Dynasty and the subsequent Chinese Republic did not accept the British seizure of Chinese territories, including the Southern Tibetan region. The present Arunachal Pradesh was South Tibet. The inhabitants are Sino and Tibetan stocks, not Indians.

When the Brits handed over the land they stole in the region to India in 1947, the British map included two lines, the Johnson Line and the McMahon Line drawn arbitrarily by two Brits as part of the British colony. These were stolen land, like all the colonies all over the world, not legitimate and illegal. No one recognise the rights of the colonial masters to these lands acquired by force, by conquest, by the rule of might is right. The USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and many others are stolen lands. Period.

However, the newly created state called India, conveniently accepted the British map and all the lands as their rightful territories, including Aksai Chin, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Nagaland, Ladakh, Khalistan and Kashmir. Is the position of India and its claim to these lands rightful and legal? Even Sikkim was not part of India but now annexed by India.

The West and the AngloSaxon gangsters also conveniently kept quiet about the illegal and illegitimate claims of the Indians. The AngloSaxons were the rogues that seized these lands when China under the Qing Dynasty was very weak, followed by several decades of civil wars in China. The Chinese were then not in a position to reclaim their lands stolen by the Brits, and now claimed by the Indians.

So, how legal and legitimate are the claims of India on Chinese lands stolen during the era of western colonisation? The Indians took back their land stolen by the Brits, and so did Pakistan and Bangladesh. But the Indians conveniently sat on Chinese lands and making themselves the rightful owners, including Kashmir and Khalistan, as the inheritance of the British Empire. Now the Indians are shouting daily that the Chinese are expansionist and aggressors when they are the real expansionist and aggressors, claiming lands that are not rightfully theirs.

Who were the Brits to draw lines on the map to say which part belong to India and which part belong to China? Who gave the Brits such authority? It is so arrogant for India to want to inherit the British lands taken by force from China and the neighbouring regions?

PS. The latest Chinese map is a message by China to India that China would reclaim all the lands stolen by the Brits. China would not allow an inch of its soil to be taken by India. China has lost its patience in negotiating with India with the intent for some trade offs. But arrogant and cocky Indians act defiantly, refusing to negotiate. China's position is now harden. No more compromises, no more give and take. China will strengthen its borders and will strike back if the Indians become adventurous.

India knows that it has no legal basis to claim Chinese lands. So it is going back in history thinking that the loose and scattered regional empires could strengthen its claims and is changing its name to Bharat.  The delusional Indians and their super power dream is getting more ludicrous by the day.

6 comments:

  1. Good morning All

    The Bloody Damned Brits and the Americunts favoured the Indians as they are more submissive and balls carrying and that's why they purposely created all these anomalies in the land border disputes and also the islands around the South China Seas to make sure that you Asians will fight amongst yourselves.

    The Peninsula Korea to divide the Koreans.

    The daft Doggies South Koreans who should be united with their kins and breathen North instead of been a colony of the UAssA.

    The Vietnamese nerds of past North and South to create divisions.

    Now the ex South Vietnamese doggies are leaning towards UAssA just to spite and bone to pick with China for teaching them a lesson in the past for been expandist in trying to bully her neighbours.

    Forgetting that China once help them in their fights against their now darlings once Foes Americunts.

    Also the Japs and Taiwanese who still wanted to be their running skunks.

    At least the Africans are brave enough to resist the Imperalists West who are having their past by date luxurious lifes by exploiting on the Colored Peoples and yet many still are blinded to their Treachery.

    Daft Daft Daft indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just to add the Wonderful and Glory Days of the White Skunks are over soon.

    Retributions and Karmas be haunting them.

    No more robbing and killings for their Wealth and Luxuries.

    They be the Papuers and Scums of the Earth Soon.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Indian ego is humongous, unless he meets a white man, then he becomes subservient.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Whoever follows the 'Empire of Lies', those are merely 'Satellites of the Empire of Lies'. Birds of a feather flocking together is never wrong. India is using the USA's songbook and tactics and singing the same hymn, like South Korea and Japan. I think Vietnam will be doing it soon.

    News are circulating that a Malaysian student had been arrested for spying in Norway. They have not revealed yet which country he was supposed to be spying for. Most likely Russia or China will figure in the equation somehow, after the game of musical chairs involving only these two players is over. Money talks and bullshit walks.

    Now, will Malaysia be dragged into the fray, knowing it is probably on target with Indonesia to be ready for a color revolution. Indonesia's election is in February, 2024, so the NED and its affiliates are working overtime, very busy months ahead for them giving out free money. Malaysia is not that calm underneath, with the country politically polarised and afflicted by racial and religious issues. The 'Empire of Lies' have to tackle these two Muslim countries first in order to be able to destablise ASEAN.

    Vietnam is now tottering and expected to fall to the dark side, Philippines is long in the net, and so is Papua New Guinea. By the way, Singapore is still neutral lah! Or so they claim. Myanmar is of course still a work in progress. Laos and Cambodia just minnows once the two Muslim states are dealt successfully with.

    Dark days ahead for ASEAN. What Joko Widodo feared is now coming true. It is up to Indonesia to make the right choice by passing laws to force NGOs to disclose funding sources, and reveals who is out to interfere in the coming election.

    ReplyDelete
  5. After being ruled by White Men for centuries, as early as 1605 under the Dutch, till independence from the British in 1947, the mentality is still imprinted in Indian minds that they are subservient to the Whites.

    The same can be applied to the Pinoys, under Spanish rule from 1565 to 1898, and later replaced by USA control for 48 long years. And this is apparent in the minds of the South Vietnamese as well, under French control since 1949 until the defeat of the USA and its allies in 1976. Which is why Joe Biden is there to remind them of their subservient past. It will rekindle their colonial subservient mindset.

    Indonesia was also under Dutch rule starting from the 17th century and regained independence in December 1949. The Indons appear to carry little of the colonial subservient baggage, and hopefully Indonesia is the odd man out to defy the return of colonialism in ASEAN.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Just ask, do South Tibet people look more like indian or chinese people, are their religion Buddhism or Hiduism.What the fvck are the Indians doing there?

    ReplyDelete