Prominent experts urging caution regarding COVID vaccination

 Prominent experts are increasingly urging caution regarding COVID vaccination, especially for individuals under 50 years of age. Notably, Dr. Kári Stefánsson, a Gold Medalist from the European Society of Cardiology, has recently suggested that those under 40 or 50 should refrain from vaccination due to potential heart inflammation linked to COVID vaccines.

Furthermore, I've compiled a comprehensive list of experts who initially supported mass vaccination but have since raised concerns, which I've dubbed the "U-Turn Tracker."

It's crucial to question whether these decision-makers are fully aware of the emerging issues surrounding experimental mRNA vaccines or if they're heavily invested in these products and thus doubling down despite mounting evidence of harm.

Additionally, there's growing concern about DNA Plasmid contaminations in Pfizer mRNA vaccines, exceeding the guidance set by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). This issue, initially identified by Kervin McKernan and subsequently confirmed by independent scientists, most notably Phillip Buckhaults, demands serious attention.

Where did the figure of 60% originate, and how did these appointed officials calculate the recommended vaccination rate for each country? What are they going to do to incentivize 60% to vaccinate? Will they offer more donuts or resort to “no-jab no-job policies?”
Singapore’s vaccination drive in 2021 when Tharman Shamugaratnam was the Deputy Prime Minister.

Is there an acknowledgment that the African continent, which has one of the lowest vaccination rates, experienced comparatively fewer severe impacts from the pandemic?

Here’s the current share of population receiving at least one dose of the vaccines. As you can see the African continent has the lowest share vaccinated population.

And there are the cases of COVID. I know these are not normalized numbers but Africa has a population 1.2 billion, you don’t need to normalize the numbers to see the obvious pattern.

What I'm stressing is that giving a universal guideline in this highly intricate situation appears irrational and neglects the precautionary principle, which suggests that when safety is uncertain, it's wiser to exercise caution and wait for more evidence before making a decision.

I also hope that people worldwide will become more aware and reconsider granting authority to unelected "global" figures like Tharman Shanmugaratnam.

Signing off for now
A17

P.S. I just watched some YouTube videos featuring Tharman Shanmugaratnam. While I'm not familiar with him, he comes across as a well-intentioned bloke who aspires to make the world a better place. Let me just say that its worth remembering the old adage: "the road to hell is paved with good intentions."

P.S.: My Singaporean friend just informed me that Tharman Shamugaratnam is highly likely to be elected as the next President of Singapore on September 1st 2023. This reminds me of a video clip in which Klaus Schwab openly admits to infiltrating governments around the world: "What we are very proud of now [is] that we penetrate the cabinets. [More than half of the Canadian cabinet ministers] are actually Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum... It's true in Argentina, and it's true in France now, with the president [being] a Young Global Leader."

You can watch the clip here.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1003573450553693

Anonymous