China and India are ancient civilisations with deep seated religious heritage and cultural roots, which were able to withstand the onslaught of the West offering their religious doctrine, which had been successfully used to corce and brainwashed those Native American Indians and Australian Aborigines. These Natives have basically tribal and fragmented background heritage, thereby enabling the Whites to steal their land much more easily.
China and India did not fall for the religious ruse of the Brits earlier, like the Native American Indians. LKY said in no uncertain terms that the attempt to convert China and India wholly to Christianity was a massive attempt, and met with equally massive failure, with few getting converted eventually. They did try, leveraging on their success earlier in North America and Australia, but were not capable of overturning the centuries old beliefs of the Chinese and Indians.
Moreover, like South Africa, China and India have large populations that cannot easily be overwhelmed by force. And they are not as backward as the Native American Indians, who were not able to fight back against superior weaponry. Africa is now purging the Anglo Saxon Whites from the continent in a big way, with South Africa setting the example as a founding member of BRICS.
But the Anglo Saxon Whites are still trying hard to take down China, after failing in their religious agenda. They tried drugging the Chinese using the Opium, tried breaking up China into sectors to be controlled by the 8 Nations, tried to stiffle China using trade wars, tried using biological means aka COVID19 viruses which will kill half the population of China, all of which met with little success of dragging China down. Now the Anglo Saxon Whites are ganging up, together with Japan and South Korea, to bring down China by resorting to technology sanctions. What does not kill China will eventually make her even stronger. They better not forget this saying.
The Whites never would miss any opportunity to hype up the China threat whenever and wherever they meet, form alliances whose objective is openly touted as countering China, create paranoia against anything made in China, be it huge quayside cranes, substation transformers, solar panels, telecommunication systems, toasters, washing machines, consumer electronics, weather balloons and even toilet seats. And they never face up to their internal national security threats posed by the USA spying regime, even when caught red-handed. Stupidity really has no cure or should I say no guts to face up to the bully.
Anonymous
As we also found out from later events, they USA could not even conquer North Korea by supporting South Korea. They were categorically defeated in Vietnam, running scared with just their pants on and tails between their legs. Of course both North Korea and North Vietnam were backed by the Russians and Chinese. Afghanistan was another glaring failure of the USA.
ReplyDeleteThe manner the USA were evacuating on rooftops during the closing stages of the Vietname War showed the intensity of their fear. At the height of the Vietnam War, more than half a million USA troops were on the ground in Vietnam. USA total air superiority was without any doubt, with carpet bombing carried out day and night. While the USA was doing that, the North Vietnames were able to escape the bombing by hiding in underground bunkers. Ingenius!
Throughout their campaign in Vietnam/Indochina, the USA dropped more than 7.6 million tons of bombs, compared to 2.1 million tons by all countries during WW2. That was the devastation they were prepared to do to North Vietnam, and the Chief of Staff of US Air Forces then, Curtis LeMay, was touted to have gloated that they were going to bomb North Vietnam back to the Stone Age.
Agent Orange, the anti vegetation biological/chemical, was aerial sprayed on jungle areas that even today made the land unsuitable for agriculture and still causing deformities in newborn babies. 'Scorched Earth' mentality was on the USA minds, wanting to destroy Vietnam totally in case it falls to the North. Amid all these, no one shouted war crimes. No action by the ICC.
Then there was Afghanistan, where the USA stayed for 20 years and still lost the war to Taliban farmers bearing small arms. The USA Military fled, leaving behind billions of dollars of weapons, on top of huge numbers of US citizens left behind. Last I heard, the Taliban restored some of the weapons left behind and are able to use them. How could an improvished rag tag outfit managed to chase the USA out of Afghanistan, says a lot about comparing GDP might against fighting prowess and tenacity.
Even success in Iraq is questionable, despite George W. Bush gloating declaration of 'Mission Accomplished'. In later years he was reported to have admitted that he was too impatient to make that declaration, knowing that 20 years down the road Iraq has 'democracy' tainted by a broken dream for its citizens. The USA only succeeded in taking control of Iraq's oil, using that as a bargaining chip to control Iraq, with oil revenues under the jurisdiction of the USA.
Look at it from another angle, though hegemony was the key objective, there is another more immediate objective, ie making more money for the Military Industrial Complex. War is just a business.
ReplyDeleteThe Americans discovered this big business from the Korean and Vietnam War. Their strategy is to dump as many ordnance as they could like carpet bombing and indiscriminate use of chemicals, basically to pour in everything, to empty their weapons warehouse and to replenish again. All these means money, money, money to be made by getting bigger and bigger military budget.
For every bullet or bomb dropped, the MIC would make more and sell more and pocket more.
Now they are dumping everything into Ukraine and the MIC would have more orders for more weapons. Big money! Billions and billions being offered to Ukraine, means more billions to be collected.
True. Now most weapons from Nato are Soviet Era obsolete stuff, sent to Ukraine for target practice by the Russians. These will then be replaced by the USA Military Establishment. Ukraine has to pay for the obsolete weapons, and with the money, Nato can buy new weapons from the USA. It is a win win situation for USA and Nato, but not for Ukraine. But put it this way, since Ukraine gets all the aid from USA, Nato and others, it is other people's money after all.
ReplyDeleteWonder whether those Patriot Missile systems are on loan as reported, or sold to Ukraine is not clear. Either way, Ukraine will have to pay for them if destroyed by Russia.
Many are saying that the shooting down of a hypersonic Russian missile by an outdated Patriot missile system is doubful, and even just propaganda. When a hypersonic missile hits the Patriot Battery, what do we call it? The hypersonic missile hit the target, or the Patriot system shot down the hypersonic missile after getting hit? It can be interpreted both ways.
Is Bangladesh a vassal of the United States?
ReplyDeleteToday, I am announcing a new visa policy under Section 212(a)(3)(C) (“3C”) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to support Bangladesh’s goal of holding free, fair, and peaceful national elections. Under this policy, the United States will be able to restrict the issuance of visas for any Bangladeshi individual, believed to be responsible for, or complicit in, undermining the democratic election process in Bangladesh. This includes current and former Bangladeshi officials, members of pro-government and opposition political parties, and members of law enforcement, the judiciary, and security services. The United States notified the Bangladeshi government of this decision on May 3, 2023.
Actions that undermine the democratic election process include vote rigging, voter intimidation, the use of violence to prevent people from exercising their right to freedoms of association and peaceful assembly, and the use of measures designed to prevent political parties, voters, civil society, or the media from disseminating their views.
The holding of free and fair elections is the responsibility of everyone—voters, political parties, the government, the security forces, civil society, and the media. I am announcing this policy to lend our support to all those seeking to advance democracy in Bangladesh.
PRESS STATEMENT
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, SECRETARY OF STATE
MAY 24, 2023
Ukraine would not be paying for the weapons. There will be no Ukraine left to pay for anything.
ReplyDeleteIt is the American taxpayers that would be paying for all the weapons. The Americans would try to make the rest of the world pay for it by buying more American bonds and T Bills and printing more US dollars.
The big winners would be the MIC.
The big losers would be Ukraine and Ukrainians, and the Russians as collaterals.
The Americans act and behave as if they own the whole world. Poking their fingers here and there, telling other countries how to behave, what they can do and cannot do.
ReplyDeleteWhat a joke!
And they are appointing vassals in position to help them police the world. Australia will police East Asia. Philippines will police ASEAN.
ReplyDeleteBangladesh holding 'free and fair' elections means that the USA has successfully infiltrated the ground in Bangladesh, using the CIA and NGOs supported by the USA, and what will result of that 'free and fair' election will result in a stooge being installed eventually in Bangladesh. Thailand has just been handed over to a USA proxy that succeeded in the recent election.
If the USA do not succeed in Bangladeh, chaos will ensue, just like in Sri Lanka and Pakistan.
The American trained new Thai PM wanted to abolish the Lese Majesty Law. Good try.
ReplyDelete"India and China, two ancient civilisations the white men failed to conquer."
ReplyDeleteAlthough this is true, these 2 countries with the largest populations are at odds with each other. This has emboldened the white scums to initiate criminal activities on both countries, especially China. It is fair to say, India with the so called "biggest democracy" has not progressed enough all-round to strike fear in the white scums. I am inclined to believe allowing one dominant religion to influence and dictate political affairs in the running of a country is likely to stifle all-round progress, more so with a population of 1.4B
That China and India survived the annihilation and destruction by the Anglo Saxon Whites must be taken as a fortunate event, otherwise we would never know who else today is able to rise up to challenge the Evil Curse.
ReplyDeleteIf China and India had gone the way of the Native American Indians, the world would probably be a different place altogether, with the Anglo Saxon Whites controlling every function and dictating the behavior of every non White race. Every other not White race would be considered inferior, less than human and to be trodden upon.
That they had ever enslaved Africans and calling every African country a 'shit hole' goes to show their disdain for other races. That they resorted to inflict genocide against the Native American Indians and Australian Aborigines shows, their cruel, vile, and inhuman trait, already apparent so early in history. This vile and cruel trait would have seen them doing the same evil towards the Chinese and Indians without any trace of guilt. What the USA and the West is doing today to China is an indication of what was long in their evil minds. And they know that India will be next to challenge them.
The Indians are already mentally broken by the Brits. 200 years of British Raj has created a subjugated political class, business class, judiciary class which rules today's India. The upper echelons of Indian society are so enamour with everything British, mentally programmed that everything white is superior.
ReplyDeleteThis Stockholm syndrome of Indian psych is nigh impossible to be erased. 200 years of British Raj equals 8 generations of reprogramming the psych of entire population of India. Sadly, there is no effort to deprogram this.
Closest to this phenomenon in China is HK. 150 years of colonization without deprogram resulted in the 2019 color revolution riots. CIA took full advantage of this colonial Stockholm syndrome.
The Brits ruled the Indians for more than 400 years.
ReplyDeleteIn China, the invaders were sinicised, to become more Chinese, absorbing Chinese language and culture.
ReplyDeleteIn India, the conquered were 'anglicised' instead of the invaders being indianised.