Biden is still claiming that the USA and the West do not want to decouple from China. Watch his tongue, as there may be a sign of a fork coming out. The USA and the West are famous for inventing 'word salads' to confuse and conceal their real agenda. They now call 'decoupling' as 'de-risk', just 'assassination' as 'target killing', 'bailing out failing banks' becomes 'merger'. These snakes or rats are very good in coining words and phrases to hide their real intentions.
China is retaliating and about time, using the National Security concerns that it has largely avoided thus far. China has taken out Windows based and foreign made computers from its Government servies for security reasons. China is banning the use of Micron chips in 'critical' systems also over security risk. This is a warning of more to come. The USA calls it a retaliation. So what if it is? The USA cannot now dictate that China cannot retaliate or cannot ban its companies. China must do even more to retaliate against Chip companies such as TSMC, Samsung, SK Hynix, Nvidia, Qualcomm, Texas Instruments etc in time to come. They want a chip war, they will get it. China will do it where it is going to hurt most, at the right time, when it finds weaknesses in the enemy's armour, and not on the spur of the moment like the West.
South Korea and Japan's trade with China are shrinking fast, especially in the semiconductor sectors, but they want to do more trade with the Pacific Islanders and others to cover up. Demand comes from a large population of 1.4 billion in China. How big a population are the Pacific Islands combined? How long it is going to take to develop the economy of the Pacific Islanders is the pertinent question to fuel the demand, and who is willing or capable of developing the island's infrastructure? Right now, Japan and South Korea could probably do trade with the Pacific Islands in coconuts, pineapples and bananas. They think trade with China can be compensated by increasing trade with other countries, good luck to them.
China had been depending largely on USA, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan in its Chip requirements for its manufacturing sector. However, as China is pouring huge resources and subsidies into chip development, do not underestimate that China cannot do away with dependence on them eventually. China can also do a 'de-risk' in due time, and is in fact working in that direction.
China is looking more favourably at Africa, Latin and Central America and now also Central Asia, which are and will be developing much faster with China's support. This is where the potential is that China is looking at, with all the resources to be jointly developed, not just South Korea and Japan where nothing in terms of resources is worth looking at, with both being vassal states of the USA and will be used by the USA as proxies to target China.
Anonymous
What is the intention of the G7, being so interested and keen to sign security arrangements with the Pacific Islanders? Who, in fact, may I ask is threatening the Pacific Islanders? Who in the past have even conducted nuclear testing in their midst, eg Marshall Islands and Bikini Atoll and contaminated Islands in the region, and now 75years later and still leaking radioactive waste. On the surface they are claiming these security agreements are not to counter anyone, but remember what can come out of 'fork tongue' creatures, when the time comes. They will never honour agreements, which they signed, by unilaterally ignoring them as eg on Ukraine.
ReplyDeleteChina already said it does not matter to them, as long as such agreements are not forged for the purpose of targeting any particular country. Suffice to say, whether they stick to their words, spoken with 'fork tongues' is at best subjective. In any case, Papua New Guinea PM, James Marape said that relations with Beijing will still remain strong. Hope this is true, and let not PNG do another Philippines towards China when pressure is exerted on them.
On the other hand, you can be sure that slowly and discreetly, these small steps of allowing USA military to use the Papua New Guinea ports means letting the devil have one foot inside their home. And the devil is not going to move out once they establish a foothold, unless being chased out like in Afghanistan. How could the Pacific Islanders move them out when the time comes and force is needed and verbal eviction is an exercise in futility like in Iraq now?
These islanders do not have the numbers, the military capability, the kind of co-operation and do not possess the kind of fighting spirit we are seeing in African countries. While Africa has a total Black population as large as China and India, which the Anglo Saxon Whites cannot overwhelm, and have largely succeeded in their anti-colonialism moves, thanks to decade long help by Russia, China, Cuba and North Korea, the Pacific Islanders have been isolated from assistance and are now forced to do the opposite by hosting these
Colonisers in the region. That is why the West sees the opportunity to capitalise on their weakness to force their hand, and why they fear so much that China will sabotage their evil plan. Hence all the anti-China rhetorics and China threat being used to create anxiety among the Islanders when China seeks to establish relations with them.
East Asia and the Indo Pacific region will see much instablity and chaos in the days ahead. The Devil has come to roost in this region.
Papua New Guinea will be the next UAssA's instigation base against the Indons.
ReplyDeleteThe Americunts got spite by the Indonesians.
Revenge and Regime Change Time
Mark my Words
PNG may be by passed by China for development if it allows Americans to build a base or allows American forces to operate from its ports and airports like little red dot.
ReplyDeleteIndonesia needs to look more strategically at the intention of the USA in Papua New Guinea. They cannot ignore Satan moving into an area so close and potentially a 'Red Line' not unlike Ukraine to Russia. Papua (Indonesia) shares a long border with Papua New Guinea and the potential for the stationing of USA military in PNG is not without consequences for Indonesia.
ReplyDeleteYes, Indonesia would not allow Satan and his entourage to create chaos at the G20 earlier and that probably pissed off Satan and his gang. Backstabbing comes when you cross Satan.
The Americans have set up Australia to control the region like Israel controlling the Middle East. They would not sell Indonesia any superior weapons than Australia, to keep Indonesia weak militarily.
ReplyDeleteNow with PNG in the pocket of the Americans, PNG could be turned into another Ukraine to do the Americans' bidding. SE Asia is going to be in trouble and more trouble when the devil is here and gaining a foothold next to Indonesia, a Muslim state.
Meta was fined a record $1.3 billion and ordered to stop sending data about Facebook users in Europe to the U.S., in a major ruling against the company for violating EU data protection rules. - New York Times
ReplyDeleteNow you know why US always suspects that TikTok is sending info to China? Because American Internet giants have been engaged in the transmission of information from other parts of the world to the US. US is really portraying China by looking at its own ugly face in the mirror.
In the case of Taiwan, China's A2AD strategy will keep the Americans and all trouble makers out of East and South China Sea. 4000km radius from Taiwan would all be sitting ducks to China's hypersonic missiles, H6 bombers, 052 to 055 destroyers, and submarines.
ReplyDeleteThe air space and sea within these range would be fully under China's control. China has won the battle of the sea and air in this region without having to fire a shot.
The Americans think they can fly or sail their aircraft and ships in the region when war is declared, like what they are doing now, burning fuel and wearing out the pilots and sailors for nothing and can go home alive?
The Reuters story in particular draws upon the tried-and-trusted practice of scapegoating China for the Covid-19 pandemic to fearmonger about its road development in Laos. But one must question whether the US ever acknowledged what it did to Laos? Did it apologize for dropping 270 million cluster bombs on it? An estimated 80 million of those did not explode, and while the US has invested in clean-up efforts, the 50,000 lives these bombs have claimed since the end of the war clearly show this is not enough. RT
ReplyDeleteThe above is proof how ineffective and faulty are American ordnance. 35% did not explode, did not work. Can you imagine dropping 270 million cluster bombs on a poor country like Laos, and how many times more onto Vietnam and Cambodia.