In those days it was easy to do regime change when the victim country was very few. The worst case was to take down Iraq and Libya at the same time. Oh, actually they were planning to take down 7 in one go, including Iran, Afghanistan, Somalia, Syria and Yemen. All small, weak Arab or Muslim countries in one part of the world. So the devils in Washington did not have much headache which one to hack first as taking down everyone of them would be a cake walk, other than Iran but not too difficult if Russia and China would stay out of the picture.
The plan was abruptly halted when Putin decided that Syria must not fall and sent in his men to keep Syria alive. With the plan stalling in Syria, the Americans could not go on to take out the other countries as planned.
Today the Americans are spoilt for choices as the target countries for regime have ballooned. Other than the 5 that have yet to be taken down, there are now a whole new list of ideal candidates even in neighbouring Latin America. Mexico, Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Haiti etc etc have joined the list as hot favourite candidates for regime change. The other new candidates are Russia, China, North Korea, Myanmar, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Qatar, Turkiye and several African states and some the Pacific Islands.
As the list grows, it presents a new problem to the devils in Washington. Which to deal with first. It is like going for a buffet lunch and everyone is so desirable and so tempting. It must be a happy problem for the Americans. And now France is also in the list for regime change. Which other European countries are also in the list? Byelorussia, Hungary or which one that is not listening and not willing to contribute to the Ukraine War? The Americans could simply close their eyes and throw the dart and would hit one.
With such a long list of countries for regime change, it must be a happy problem for the Americans. Maybe they are working out a schedule, to start with the nearest to homeland America or the furthest, or to start with the weakest like Haiti? Or to start with their greatest traditional enemies, the Arab and Muslim countries first? Or to start with their greatest hype and greatest pain in the ass, North Korea.
The world is holding its breath as to which country would be the fortunate one to be chosen for regime change first. How about starting with France as the French are acting difficult and making a bad example for the other European allies?
What do you think?
Russia was supposed to collapse at start of 2022, with all the sanctions imposed and a regime change expected to follow. A new Russian people's uprising was supposed to take place, with the Russian economy expected to collapse and the Ruble becoming 'rubble' after all those sanctions.
ReplyDeleteThat was the plan of dementia Joe, who openly touted a regime change in Russia by the removal of Putin. But he has probably forgotten his broken dream due to his memory deficiency. Well, the first takedown of the top candidate for a regime change just failed to materialise and is falling to pieces. They started with the wrong candidate that was too big to be swallowed.
China is next top choice now, with Saudi Arabia to savour the honours next. These two are countries of geopolitical importance to the USA and instrumental to the continuance of the US$ hegemony. They needed to be taken down by turn. But taking down or doing a regime change in China is a pipe dream. This is not the same China succumbing meekly to gunboat diplomacy.
Haiti is not a significant target yet, but they have been eyeing it earlier, intending to leverage on the unrest that erupted months ago, claiming they need to 'stabilise' the country. Moreover, doing a regime change in Haiti is just a walk in the park for the USA, being just off the Florida coast, less than a day's sailing. They could do it blindfolded if they want, but having said their piece about sovereignty of countries, vis a vis Ukraine, they will face certain wrath from the global community if they invade a smaller country uninvited, especially from countries that believe in 'Principles'. You know what I mean? Not that they even care about 'Principles' themselves.
North Korea had been targeted for decades, in fact three generations of the Kim dynasty had been targeted. With Russia and China behind its back, a regime change is not that easy. The Korean War can testify to its ability and tenacity to stand up to the USA. That was several decades ago, and North Korea is now a nuclear state, with missiles to spare for celebrations, and even able to send up spy satellites into space, which the Japanese wants to shoot down. That does not make it any easier for the USA, small in deterrent its nuclear arsenals may be, but still enough to deliver a killer punch if pushed against the wall.
Kim, like Putin is not one to be messed around.
I wish they could do a regime change in sinkieland...haha
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/1zq4v0lgKwo
ReplyDeleteWah just see this biting video by Geroge Galloway's speech in CGTN China and the Whites gringing in pains on their faces.
USA may go for soft target.They had no gut to take on hard targets like Iran. USA shit in it pant if any mention of taking on the Pla and the Wagner mercenaries directly. The softer and fatter candidates would be Canada. Canada are vulnerable as population of 40 mil compares to USA 350 mil , land area bigger than USA. Easy access from North and South America. Canada must beware of USA.
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/D2mSJT9oevk
ReplyDeleteWow just loved this Lady. Clare Daly.
Hits the nails on the Wars Mongers Heads.
If only the Rest have the same guts to also hits them onto their coffins.
Cheers
https://youtu.be/JNy6vcWRiB8
ReplyDeleteEurope had become USA dogs by Clare Daly
Iran is not as underdeveloped as many in the West like to believe, despite the sanctions by the West. That was the same mindset of people in the West regarding China too, and it still persists in some quarters. Iranian drones are well sought after by many countries and are weapons now used by the Russians in Ukraine. Many believe that Iran can have the bomb in a matter of months if they are forced to.
ReplyDeleteMany will remember that Iran does retaliate when pushed and lessons have been learnt by those trying to mess around with them.
Historically, Persians are very great warriors. Those were of course in the days of bow arrows and spears. But Iran has not been idle in moving forward, perhaps pushed by circumstances by enemies and just like the Chinese, are going for the hard stuff like drones and missiles. Sometimes pressure from outside makes a country more determined than ever to take on impossible goals. And necessity is the mother of invention is not just an idle saying.
Not even close; it's Putin's fault:
ReplyDelete'Mackinder’s Heartland was the core of Eurasia – Ukraine and Russia. The World Island was all of Eurasia, including Europe, the Middle East and Asia. Britain was never a part of Continental Europe; it was a separate naval and maritime power, and should remain so whatever the cost.
The Mackinder geopolitical perspective shaped Britain’s entry into both World War 1 and 2. It shaped American involvement in Europe from 1941.
'Soon after taking office in 1999, Vladimir Putin, a nationalist with a long career in Russian intelligence, faced the daunting task of trying to undo, or at least limit, the damage that the criminal cronies of Yeltsin and their foreign partners had done to Russia.'
The gradual re-emergence of a dynamic Russia in the Heartland of Eurasia, one that was growing economically closer to China and to key nations of Western Europe, was the very development that Brzezinski had warned could mortally threaten American dominance. It was Halford Mackinder’s worst nightmare.'
“Potentially, the most dangerous scenario would be a grand coalition of China, Russia, and perhaps Iran, an “anti-hegemonic” coalition united not by ideology but by complementary grievances. It would be reminiscent in scale and scope of the challenge once posed by the Sino-Soviet bloc, though this time China would likely be the leader and Russia the follower. Averting this contingency, however remote it may be, will require a display of U.S. geostrategic skill on the western, eastern, and southern perimeters of Eurasia simultaneously.”
'The West slowly is discovering that that it has no pressure point versus Russia (its economy being relatively sanctions-proof), and its military is no match for that of Russia’s.” In parallel, how “the threat to US dominance is that China, Russia and Mackinder’s Eurasian World Island heartland are offering better trade and investment opportunities than are available from the United States with its increasingly desperate demand for sacrifices from its NATO and other allies.”
'The Empire all but expelled from Central Asia after the Afghan humiliation; and sooner rather than later its expulsion from the first island chain in the Western Pacific, complete with a starring role for the Chinese DF-21D “carrier killer” missiles. So the rules have changed drastically. The Hegemon is naked. '
Link to article:
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2022/05/21/has-russia-already-won-is-it-game-over-for-the-rothschild-rockefeller-empire?s=04
Saudi Arabia be next on the list. To regain back control of the USD. Too many royal cousins uncles vying to sit the throne. Uncle Sam can easily buy them.
ReplyDeleteBut MBS is no dummy. Can be ruthless if needed be. Don't underestimate him. And now has the Bear & Dragon as his new best friends.
Sure as hell MBS is next on the list. He is not a weak leader as displayed so far, and no pushover, even for the USA. And the USA dislike strong leaders. It is just a matter of time. The USA will capitalise on any perceived split inside the Royal Household to put into gear their regime changing moves.
ReplyDeleteTherefore, MBS has to keep a close watch on his own royal cousins, which is very true. And there are said to be around 15,000 of such royal cousins, some of which may not agree with his moves.
Moreover, most or even all of them have significant assets in USA and Western banks to protect, and what MBS is doing is increasing the risk for them of being seized if Satan were to find a way to create an opportunity to destablise the kingdom eg using human rights to impose sanctions on Saudi Arabia and their Royals. They have seen that already with Russian Oligarchs being taken to the cleaners by the USA for being Russians. There is nothing that Satan and his followers will not do to keep the US$ hegemony alive. There is even the oil to be taken as in Syria and Iraq. And what the USA needed now is oil and more oil.
MBS is the most promising leader the Arab world has produced in modern times. He has all the attributes to lead the Arab and Muslim world to greater heights.
ReplyDeleteThe Americans would be going all out to take him down. MBS must be very careful and protect himself with the best men available. The rise of MBS is the rise of the Arab and Muslim world.