Ukraine was winning, taking over several towns and the Russians in retreat. Putin is lost for words, the Ukrainians are fighting bravely and the Russians are in disarray. Zelensky vowed to take over all the territories lost to the Russians including Crimea. Yes, Ukraine is winning and the war would soon be over with a regime change in Russia.
And it was such great jobs to blow up the two pipelines and the Crimean Bridge. The Russians did not know what hit them and could not do anything. Celebrations all over Ukraine and Europe.
Oops, oops, the joy was too early, too premature. These dimwits could not appreciate the kind and patient Putin for not blowing Ukraine to ashes, for not wanting to cause more civilian casualties. Putin's kindness was not appreciated and seen as a weakness. This delusion did not last long. Putin's patience was tested and the Crimean Bridge was a bridge too far. Putin let his shit down all over Ukraine. More than 200 bombs/missiles rained on Ukraine. But the Ukrainians claimed only a few dead and a few playgrounds were hit. Nothing serious. The Russian bombs were duds, missed their targets, got shot down and simply ineffective.
A simple guesstimate, assuming each missile/bomb costs $1m, the latest raid on Ukraine would cost Putin more than $200m just on the bombs/missiles alone. And the casualty was a handful of dead bodies. This must be very expensive, $20m for one killed?
According to independent western analysts, till todate, Ukraine has lost at least 100,000 of their regular soldiers and 300,000 or 400,000 wounded and out of action. Those Ukrainians still fighting are the conscripts pulled out from the streets and unable to man sophisticated weapon systems sent in by the West albeit many contractors ie Americans or NATO soldiers were the real operators. The latest salvo by the Russians hit many major and strategic targets that the western media would not show to the world. The bombs/missiles are accurate precision weapons, guided by AI and satellite mappings, proving that the Russians knew exactly where to hit and the valued targets, including many NATO positions and air defence systems.
Who is winning the war? Who are fighting this war? The main professional Russian soldiers have been withdrawn from the frontline after the success in taking over the eastern Ukrainian provinces. Come winter, when these professional soldiers are deployed again into Ukraine, they would be no mercy if the Ukrainians continue with their sneaky attacks into Russian territories. Putin did not want to white wash Ukraine and turn it into ashes. But he may be forced to do it by the aggressive and treacherous American and NATO forces.
The war of propaganda is just that. What is real would be real, and Putin could launch an all out offensive into Ukraine if he is not concerned with the civilian casualties. Putin has started to hit where it hurts after the mediocre clown Zelensky thinks it is easy and ok to hit the Russians where and as he pleased. How long is Zelensky going to clown around and pretend that all is well, that Ukraine is running down the Russians and winning?
Keep begging for more aids, weapons and charity and keep dreaming that he will win the war. Does he think he is another Nutpolean, oops, Napolean? The Americans and Europeans are running out of weapons themselves. And Putin is just warming up.
President Putin must teach these Zelensky dogs and Nazis a lesson, never to sabotage and take advantage of Russia again. Looks like they have forgotten what the USSR had taught them some 70 years back.
ReplyDeleteRemember the 'Mission Accomplished' gloating by George W. Bush on Iraq? A big bold bunting strung across the length of a warship, announcing this, was hung behind him when he made that speech. So, in Ukraine, it is the same hubris on MSM to fool the world.
ReplyDeleteWhat did George W. Bush achieved? Theft of Iraqi oil is the result, not a total military victory. Even today, Iraq is still in conflict and Iraqis are suffering. What kind of benefits did that USA victory bring to the country? Democracy my foot! The people mostly supported the USA against Saddam Hussein and now who is bearing the sufferings?
The CIA and NGOs probably worked for years on the ground and sold the hubris about Saddam having WMD and that the Iraqi people have to get rid of Saddam Hussein to give the people a taste of democracy. Democracy is of course for the USA and West to steal the artifats from the Palace and the oil in Iraq. Did they find WMD or chemical weapons. Yes, some white milk powders and steel pipes were all the evidence they could find and Scott Ritter was there to confirm it.
And what did the UN do? Nothing but a lame duck when it comes to war crimes committed by the USA and allies right before their eyes. Now, everyday talking about Russian war crimes that never were.
The UN should be disbanded forthwith. It only serves the Evil 😈 USA, nobody else.
ReplyDeleteGeorge Bush Jr was absolutely right. The missions of the Americans in the invasion of Iraq were:
ReplyDelete1. To murder Saddam Hussein to stop him from selling oil in other currencies.
2. To destabilise Iraq so that it becomes a dysfunctional country, unable to bring peace and development for the Iraqis.
3. To instal an American puppet so that the Americans could control Iraq like a colony and weaken the Arab world.
4. To steal all the oil the Americans want.
Democracy, WMD were just ruses to use for the invasion.
Iraq is finished. The Iraqis are finished for the next 50 years at least, as a torn and divided country. The Arab and Muslim world lost a great Arab and Muslim leader and an Arab and Muslim country in their ranks. The Arab and Muslim world would forever be divided and destabilised by the Americans and white men and remain poor and weak.
Mission Accomplished indeed in favour of American interests.
US considering using nukes (going M.A.D.):
ReplyDelete'If you are a Russian military planner, you realize that M.A.D is no longer a reality. In the event that Russia believed it faced a genuine existential threat from the West from a nuclear strike, even a tactical hit, the Russian military could present President Putin with a viable plan that would destroy the U.S. nuclear response with limited (albeit horrific) damage to Russia. I am not suggesting that Russia would walk away unscathed. But Russia, with a field tested, integrated anti-ballistic missile defense system, would have a better than even chance of surviving a nuclear exchange with the United States.I will repeat–this is a last resort action and I am steadfastly opposed to it. But I think it should be part of the public discussion. Too many ignorant pundits and politicians in the West disparage Russia’s military capabilities as second rate at best.'
'United States realized that a very real technological gap growing, both in missile and anti-missile systems, which creates a rationale for the US to use a first strike as a preventive measure. It doesn't mean that the probability of these scenarios are high, but they are not trivial either. However the Mutually Assured Destruction (M.A.D.) is pretty much a dying concept against new Russian technologies being rolled out and deployed in industrial quantities.'
'The S-500 is designed to destroy all existing and prospective means of aerospace attack of a potential enemy in the entire range of altitudes and speeds.'
Why? 'Cos the US "elite" (Ivy League) universities produce imbeciles. So do London "elite" education. E.G. why the U.K. is over:
Former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has now emerged as the Conservative Party's most popular potential replacement for the current head of government, Liz Truss, a new YouGov poll has shown. The survey, which was conducted on October 17-18, revealed that 32% of respondents would like Johnson to return as prime minister, despite a series of scandals and cabinet resignations that precipitated his eventual departure. “Those who voted for Truss to take over are particularly keen on a Boris Johnson return if she left: 44% put him top of their list of potential successors,” the pollsters noted.
Link to article: https://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/
As I said earlier, Johnson was just taking a long break and had planned for his return. He just threw all the problems to Liz Truss to solve, which Liz Truss is least able to do.
ReplyDeleteJohnson was touted as the worst British PM in history, but now that crown belongs to Liz Truss, and that makes Boris still a better choice now, for the Brits. Some are predicting that Truss will have to resign and not last till end of October. Look at the body language of Truss sitting there behind Hunt, pathetically listening to the debate between Jeremy Hunt and Labour's Rachael Reeve. Do watch the video on Youtube. Let us wait and see.
But all that is irrelevant if an election is to be called. Then it would be a Labour Government, as Labour is now street ahead in polling numbers.
News From Russia:
ReplyDeleteMOSCOW, Oct 19 — Russian President Vladimir Putin said today that he was declaring martial law in the four regions of Ukraine that Russia has proclaimed as annexed - Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia.
What is happening in Europe is so unreal. No one would believe countries and national leaders would allow their countries to be dragged into a war against their national interests and to be bankrupt and destroyed in the process.
ReplyDeleteAnd these are not third world countries, supposedly advanced and sophisticated countries. What they are doing is so insane. Instead of living peacefully and enjoying their good lives, they are acting as if they could not say no and let the Americans bring their countries to the point of eventual collapse. Can this be real?
The European countries are going down one by one, for what? Why?
It is so unbelieveable.