10/03/2022

Ukraine - Russia officially annexed the eastern states of Russian speaking Ukraine

 As expected, the US and NATO, the expansionists and warmongers took the opportunity to condemn Russia and to impose more sanctions, without know or did not want to know that the sanctions were against European countries in reality. Europe would be facing the worst sanctions of its kind, self imposed or forced upon them by the Americans and would be ruined for good.

Below is a quote from CNA.

"In response, the United States on Friday imposed sweeping sanctions on Russia, targeting hundreds of people and companies, including those in Russia's military-industrial complex and lawmakers.

NATO's Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that its allies "do not and will not recognise any of this territory as part of Russia".

"We call on all states to reject Russia's blatant attempts at territorial conquest These lands are Ukraine," he added."

And as usual, only American allies would open their big mouths to condemn Russia without wanting to know who started this war, who started to massacre Russian speaking Ukrainians, without wanting to know that the perpetrators were the neo Nazis, fully supported, funded and trained by the Americans and their allies.

And also expected, the whole world remained reticent. From Latin America, across the Atlantic to Africa, Middle East, Asia and SE Asia, no one is on the side of the warmongering Americans and NATO. Asean is conspicuously quite for good reasons. Why be a busybody on something that has nothing to do with Asean? Why support the warmongers and American expansion against Russia? Probably Asean has seen it clearly who are the real devils.

The Americans could still pretend to claim that the international community is behind them, but actually consisting of the 27 European countries that they have coerced into obedience and a few of their semi colonies in East Asia. 

This Ukraine War is actually the Americans/Europeans against the Russians and in a way against the rest of the world. The rest of the world have clearly distanced themselves from the warmongering Americans and tacitly supporting Russia and China, ignoring all the American sanctions.  If the whites succeeded in bringing down Russia and then China, they would once again rule the rest of the world and whack any country that disobey their so called farcical 'rules based order'. It would be the American Empire and hegemony 2.0.

22 comments:

  1. We, my whole family, fully support Russia defending against the Neo-Nazis of Zalenskyy (can be clearly seen being protected by two huge size Nazis on his flanks).

    In fact, this war has been going on for the past 8 years, since Zalendskyy stole the Presidency, with the instigation and full support of the Evil USA.

    Russia has just started to send her troops in February.

    In fact, Russia should have done it much earlier, in order to alleviate the sufferings of the Russian speaking people in those four countries.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Singapore also support the west against Russia the only asean country that dare to punch above it's weight

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Pope Francis has for the first time directly appealed to Russia’s President Vladimir Putin to stop the “spiral of violence and death” in Ukraine, saying he is haunted by “rivers of blood and tears”.

    The Chief of the Catholic Church also condemned the annexation of four regions of Ukraine, saying it risked nuclear escalation and urged Putin to think of his own people during an address dedicated to Ukraine in St Peter’s Square."

    What kind of wheat is this Pokai Pope smoking? He is obviously being involved in Politics of the Evil West!

    Who the fxxks he thinks he is? Trying to exert his authority onto Russia, without finding out how this war has started???!!!

    This Pokai Pope is obviously not a neutral guy.



    ReplyDelete
  4. There is a world of difference between punching above one's weight and stupidity has no cure.

    There is a world of difference between speaking on grounds of principles and being coerced to speak.

    ReplyDelete
  5. NEW YORK, October 2.

    The US and the UK may be behind the explosions at Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 pipelines, former advisor to US Defense Secretary in the administration of ex-president of the United States Donald Trump, Douglas Macgregor, said in a conversation with Andrew Napolitano, the presenter of the Judging Freedom podcast.

    "You have to look at who are the state actors that have the capability to do this. And that means the [UK’s] Royal Navy and the United States’ Navy <…> I think that’s pretty clear," Macgregor said.

    He also noted the publication by Poland’s former foreign minister (2007-2014), European parliament member Radoslaw Sikorski, who thanked the United States for damaging the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines on his Twitter page.

    Ex-Advisor to the Pentagon Chief called the notion that Moscow was behind the incident at the pipelines absurd.

    "The Russians did not do this," he said, adding that Germany’s involvement in the incident was "extremely unlikely" either.

    Four Nord Stream gas pipeline leaks have been uncovered, with the most recent one being pinpointed by Sweden’s coast guard.

    Earlier, the Nord Stream AG company reported that three threads of the Nord Stream 1 and 2 offshore gas pipelines had suffered unprecedented damage on Monday.

    Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated that Moscow was "deeply concerned about the news" and did not rule out that the pipelines’ operation could have been disrupted by an act of sabotage.

    Swedish seismologists later reported that two explosions had been recorded along the Nord Stream pipelines on Monday.

    The Danish Energy Agency reported that a large amount of gas had spilled into the sea.

    Aircraft and ships are barred from approaching the site any closer than five nautical miles.

    (As reported in New York)


    ReplyDelete
  6. They said the leak has stopped. Of course the leaks will stop after all the gas inside have escaped, since Russia is not pumping any more gas through them.

    ReplyDelete


  7. TUCKER CARLSON:

    "I hate to start a Tuesday evening on a grim note, but one of the environmental catastrophes, one of the great environmental catastrophes of our time, is unfolding tonight off the coast of Denmark. The Nord Stream pipelines, which are enormous Russian owned conduits that carry natural gas from Russia to Western Europe, have been breached."

    "As we speak, Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 are pouring millions of cubic meters of natural gas into the Baltic Sea. Pictures from the air, which you can now see on your screen, show a toxic bubble field more than half a mile wide. You can only guess at how many marine mammals are being killed right now – countless. But the lasting damage may be to the atmosphere."

    "Natural gas is comprised of up to 90% methane. Methane, as Joe Biden has often told you, is the key driver of global warming, which is, of course, an existential threat to humanity and the planet. So, if you're worried about Climate Change, what just happened to the Nord Stream pipelines is as close to the apocalypse as we have ever come. So, the question is, how did this happen? And it turns out it was not an accident."

    "At the very same time that leaks in these pipelines were detected, Swedish officials recorded two powerful undersea explosions, each one of which was equivalent to hundreds of pounds of TNT. Nothing in nature can account for that. Almost immediately, the pipelines began leaking in three separate places. So, there's only one explanation for what happened."

    "This was an act of industrial terrorism. That was very obvious to the Prime Minister of Poland and he wasted no time in saying so."

    MATEUSZ MORAWIECKI, POLISH PRIME MINISTER:

    "Today we are also dealing with an act of sabotage. We do not know the details of what happened yet, but we can clearly see that it is an act of sabotage, an act that probably marks the next stage in the escalation of the situation we are dealing with in Ukraine."

    "We can clearly see," he said, "this was an act of sabotage, an act of terrorism. Well, yes, we can see that. So, the question is, who did it? And of course, the prime suspect is obvious. It would be the same man who caused domestic inflation here in the U.S. and stole the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton. That'd be Vladimir Putin. The Washington Post got right to it. "Putin," they declared, "is now weaponizing the Nord Stream pipelines."

    Conitnues....

    ReplyDelete
  8. Continued:

    "According to the Canadian ambassador to the U.N., Vladimir Putin has decided to use "pollution as an act of war." Progressive Twitter strongly endorsed this conclusion. Putin did it and that makes sense until you thought about it for just a moment. Vladimir Putin may be evil. They tell us that he is evil, but is he stupid? Probably isn't stupid and yet and, here's the strange part, if you were Vladimir Putin, you would have to be a suicidal moron to blow up your own energy pipeline. That's the one thing you would never do."

    "Natural gas pipelines are the main source of your power and your wealth and most critically, your leverage over other countries. Europe needs your energy now more than ever with winter approaching. If you can't deliver that energy, then countries like Germany have no need to pay attention to what you want. You're in the middle of a war, an all hands-on deck war, so you need all the leverage you can get. Under these circumstances, there is no chance you would blow up Nord Stream 1 or 2."

    "Not now, obviously. In fact, it's so obvious that even as our famously dim secretary of State, Tony Blinken, seemed to acknowledge it, sabotaging Nord Stream, he said today is "clearly in no one's interest." Right, but really only half right. It is true that blowing up Nord Stream does not help Vladimir Putin. He would not do that. Why would he? But that doesn't mean that other countries wouldn't consider doing it. They would consider it and we know they have considered it because at least one of them has said so in public. In early February, less than three weeks before the war in Ukraine began, Joe Biden suggested on camera that he might take out these pipelines."

    Continues....


    ReplyDelete
  9. The criminal Americans blew up the pipelines and conveniently blamed it on Russia. The Russians knew exactly who did it. The whole world knows who did it, definitely not the Russians.

    Evil Americans must be brought to justice.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Continued:

    "Notice how he phrased it and he's the President. He doesn't phrase things by accident, particularly his reading off cards. He didn't say, I will pause the delivery of gas from Russia to Germany. He said there won't be a Nord Stream 2. We'll put an end to it. Will take it out. Will blow it up."

    "How will you do this?" He was asked.

    "I promise you we will be able to do it. They thought this through and yet those watching, very much including us, didn't take Biden seriously when he said it."

    This is the President who has declared Climate Change as the most pressing emergency in the history of the world. This is the man who lectures you about using a woodstove or driving an SUV because of its emissions. This is the guy who spent billions trying to mitigate cow flatulence because of methane. Would that guy really blow up a methane pipeline in the middle of the Baltic Sea? It was hard to imagine."

    "That would be an unimaginably reckless act. That would be the kind of thing you would do if you wanted to start a Nuclear War. It would be insane and yet in retrospect, it's obvious they were thinking about this because Joe Biden wasn't the only person to suggest it."

    Toria Nuland at the State Department said pretty much the very same thing. Nuland is a lifelong War Cheerleader."

    "She worked to bring about the Iraq invasion, never apologized, kept going."

    "She helped engineer the coup that overthrew the Ukrainian government some 8 years back. So capable, clearly she's capable of anything... but environmental terrorism?"

    "Even for Toria Nuland, that seemed too much, too extreme, and yet here she is in January."

    VICTORIA NULAND:

    "With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have very strong and clear conversations with our German allies and I want to be clear with you today. If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward."

    "One way or the other, we'll stop Nord Stream."

    "Now, looking back, those words seem chilling eight months later, as natural gas pours into the Baltic Sea and is in the atmosphere. So, you have to ask, could the Biden Administration really do something like this? We can't say for sure. We don't know for sure. We can tell you that close allies of the Biden White House believe they certainly did do it."

    "Radek Sikorski is a Polish politician who is Chairman of the EU USA delegation in the European Parliament."

    "He's connected. He's also the husband of the Regime stenographer Anne Applebaum of The Atlantic magazine."

    "Sikorski is so close to Joe Biden that he's got a picture of the two of them together in his Twitter profile. So, when the pipelines blew up, Sikorski responded immediately and here's what he wrote. "Thank you. USA."

    "So once again, did the Biden Administration really do this? It's hard to believe. Given that it's an atrocity, it's effectively an act of terrorism, we don't want to make that accusation, but we should tell you that maybe not coincidentally, today, a brand-new pipeline was unveiled, a pipeline that carries non-Russian natural gas in roughly the same areas, Nord Stream 1 and 2. This is called the Baltic Pipe. It was inaugurated in Poland. It will carry natural gas from Norway through Denmark to Poland and other countries nearby. And it's likely to do very well, since now it has less competition.

    Continues....

    ReplyDelete
  11. Continued:

    "Making sense? What does the White House say about this? How are they accounting for what happened today?"

    "Well, they're not exactly enthusiastically denying responsibility for it. Instead, they're looking at the upside. Here's the President's publicist, noting that the destruction of yet another energy pipeline is yet another opportunity for you to buy an electric car."


    KARINE JEAN-PIERRE:

    "As you all know, these pipelines weren't pumping gas into Europe at this time and NS2 was never operational, as you guys know. NS1 has not been operational for weeks because Putin has weaponized energy and we have said this, many times before. This just drives home the importance of our efforts to work together to get alternative gas supplies to Europe and to support efforts to reduce gas consumption and accelerate true energy independence by moving to clean energy economy."

    "Moving to clean energy" say that people who very may well be responsible for letting methane into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere at a scale that most people can't imagine. The people lecturing you about your SUV may have blown up a natural gas pipeline and created one of the great catastrophes of our time in its effect on the environment."

    "If they did this, this will be one of the craziest, most destructive things any American Administration has ever done. But it would also be totally consistent with what they do."

    "What do they do? They destroy."

    "These people built nothing, not one thing. Instead, they tear down and they desecrate from historic statues to the Constitution to energy infrastructure and no one in Congress is trying to stop any of it. They're just preparing for the inevitable fallout."

    "Tonight, the Senate just advanced a spending bill with $35 million for the Department of Energy to "prepare for and respond to potential Nuclear and Radiological incidents in Ukraine."

    "What?"

    "The spending bill also brings the total U.S. expenditure on Ukraine, the war, but also funding its government and energy for Ukraine to $67 billion on the eve of what could be a massive economic disruption here to our economy, $67 billion. How much is that? Well, it's more than Russia's entire military budget last year, and Congress is expected to fully pass the bill later this week with Republicans nodding along like the zombies they are."

    "What would be the effect of this? Every action has a reaction, equal and opposite. Blow up the Nord Stream pipelines? Okay, we've entered a new phase, one in which the United States is directly at war with the largest nuclear power in the world. It doesn't mean we'll go nuclear immediately, but it does suggest there could be consequences. If we actually blow up the Nord Stream pipelines, why wouldn't Russia sever undersea internet cables?"

    "What would happen if they did that? What would happen if banks in London couldn't communicate with banks in New York? Just that one piece of it, leaving aside its potential effects on our power grid, but let's just say the banks couldn't communicate with each other for one day. What would the economic effect of that be?"

    "We would cascade downward into your house. We can have an actual collapse. We could wind up very quickly in third world conditions. Those are the stakes. Have the people behind this, the geniuses like Toria Nuland, considered the effects? Maybe they have. Maybe that was the point."

    The End.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Two guys inside a lift. One farted. Both said not me. Both knew exactly who did it.

    What's next? Can the culprit get away?

    ReplyDelete
  13. All the time talking about Putin weaponising energy. What is the big deal? The USA has weaponised the US$ for decades. Held hostage countries utilising the SWIFT system by weaponising it. The pot is blacker than the kettle, and yet calling the kettle black.

    The world is sick and tired of being sick and tired of the same old tirade of YOU CANNOT DO WHAT I DID. Only the USA has the prerogative to do all those things. China cannot exert influence in any country in any way. China cannot overtake the USA and must be stopped. Hypocritical arseholes!

    ReplyDelete
  14. China cannot sign security agreements with Pacific Islands. Only AngloSaxon countries can sign security agreements with Pacific Islands.

    ReplyDelete

  15. Ideally,
    Russia should annex the Whole of Ukraine.
    This shall end any further mischieves from Ukraine and it's instigators once and for all.
    Russia can
    also spread out the Ukraine People thinly and sporadically over its' vast landmass to augment yhe Development og Russia.


    ReplyDelete
  16. Agree. Russia should have annex the whole of Ukraine long ago. It's not too late now.

    Russia can still annex the whole of Ukraine and then take it's own time to De-Nazify the Nazis of Zalendskyy.

    First of all, Russia should caprure Zalendskyy dead or alive. This idiot is getting too big for his shoes. And he has shown no respect whatsoever for President Putin.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Zelenskyy wants fast track entry as a member of NATO, ostensibly for protection I think.

    But honestly, the EU vis a vis NATO is itself in serious trouble right now. Ukraine is the most corrupt country in Europe under Zelenskyy and the others are not obviously not going to bear the responsibility of footing the bill to rebuild Ukraine. As it is, some EU countries are right now living on the blessings of countries like Germany and France before the war. Now Germany and France are in serious trouble themselves, having shot their own foot with the sanctions against Russia.

    Why would NATO want to take in a massive liability like Ukraine into it's fold? It is a no brainer for them to do so. Ukraine's entry will sink NATO like a ton of bricks.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Any country engaging in a war with another country cannot join any grouping. This is NATO's standing at the present moment. However, the grouping can also change their minds as a collective group if it wanted to.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Sinki land is helping to protect the earth by having more F1 race...haha

    ReplyDelete
  20. Lizard Truss can end the Ukraine war by visiting Zelenskyy for the Jinx to put a quick end to the clown. It is being said that Lizard Truss visited Lizard Queen just days before she passed away. Lizard Truss is now considered a jinx by some.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Liz Truss (the two words together means Dis-Trust) who visited the Lizard Queen two days before she died signifies that she has caused the Death of the Queen. Otherwise, she could have lived to 100 years old.

    ReplyDelete