Olaf Schultz is a different man going to China. Believe that. He is a
changed man, or so it seems. Anyway, it is becoming apparent that there
is no real convergence of views and policies within the German Coalition
Government, between Schultz, Bareback and the other one Humpback or
whatever. Strange names that are confusing to remember.
Schultz
is going to China to teach Xi about human rights. He must be crazy to do
that. Xi will tell him that China does not need the Germans or the West
to teach them about human rights. In fact no Western country has the
moral authority to talk about human rights, after what they did to China
during the Opium War, trying to force China to open up to the Opium
trade and breaking up China into concessions, which they claimed was
their sphere of influence. The Germans were there.
Can they say
that China then was different? You see, the USA new 'Rule of Law' is all
mainly centred on human rights. In Africa it is human rights issues. In
China, North Korea, Russia and Myanmar, it is all about human rights.
Did Julian Assange enjoy his human rights in the USA? Did Edward
Snowden, who has now been given Russian citizenship, enjoy his human
rights in the USA? The easiest thing to stir up unrest in any part of
the world is human rights issues if the USA and the West cannot find any
other straw to grab in order to stir up unrest. And that is the
territory of the CIA and USA funded NGO's, that are working the ground
of those countries they want to destablise.
Right now, Iran is
the top target. Pakistan has already been targeted long ago and is in
full blown chaos. Myanmar is being targeted, but the strong military
hold is preventing a full blown unrest. ASEAN is trying to soften the
ground for the West to capitalise and the Military Junta has warned
ASEAN not to try anything funny.
How to rein in Myanmar when
ASEAN refused to allow the Military Junta to be represented in their
deliberations? And like Venezuela, they only recognise the non
legitimately elected representative to have a voice.
Anonymous
APEC 2024 Peru. Biden shafted to a corner in the back row. Xi in front row next to Peru's President
Already reported 149 deaths and many many injuries. Your figures are too low.
ReplyDeleteThe souls of Seoul sinply love to get themselves killed by such demonic acts. This is their karma too.
The attacker was looking for Nancy, not her husand. Her husband was there at the wrong place and the wrong time. His skull was said to be cracked, but he is still alive. Skull cracked but no brain injury!
ReplyDeleteOne thing strange though. How did the attacker gain entry to her home so easily? She is third in line for POTUS, so her home should be well secured.
I think there is more to it than meets the eye. Maybe Trump should be given the honour of being involved in the attack. Maybe should blame Putin or even Xi. LOL
After all, many strange things could happen, especially just two weeks before the Mid-term election. OK, OK just conspiracy theories.
Biden said that he is not planning to meet Putin at the G20. As if Putin is dying to meet him.
ReplyDeleteBiden still does not remember that he was ignored by leaders at the 'Summit of the Americas'. Even less prominent leaders of smaller countries in South America ignored him.
Rest assured Putin, Xi and Joko Widodo will be talking to each other. They do not need Biden to give fake assurances that will never be honoured. Talking to him is a waste of time.
The wheels of the wagon of the Democratic Party of the USA are falling off. They know they will lose the mid term and have to fabricate what they used to call 'a Pearl Harbour moment' to jell their supporters, lest they also fell out of the wagon. They needed to solidify their flimsy support.
ReplyDeleteThey January 6th riot case against Trump, and the FBI raid on his Mar-a-lago home are all conducted to ensure he will not be able to stand in 2024. The Democrats are now terrified of Trump coming back and will do anything to make sure he does not.
On the other hand, will Biden be mentally capable of standing in 2024? Honestly, even if he does and is elected, what does it matter anyway, since he is lead by the nose by aides, prompted by his handlers with hidden cards telling him what to do, and above all controlled by the powers behind the scene. Controlling a dementia afflicated old man is the easiest thing to do. But it does elicit accusations of 'elderly abuse' by certain quarters.
Whether it's the Democrats or the Republicans, they are all the same, as far as the World is concerned. It is just the right and left hand singing in the same concoction of tunes suitable to their own ears.
ReplyDeleteRight! Whether Democrats or Republicans, they are all members of an opera. One Party sings the low notes and the other has to sing the high notes. It is all a great operatic arrangement.
ReplyDeleteActually, if we think deeper, it is all under the control of the director, the Deep State. Who sings the high notes and who will sing the low notes is decided every four years.
UK Dog Slunk Away From Fight
ReplyDeleteBritish billionaire Richard Branson has declined a live televised debate with Singapore’s Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam on the city-state’s drug policy and death penalty. - (Bloomberg)