- https://8630368.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/8630368/AMPS/Altman%20Report%20Final%20Version%2011-8-22%20(1).pdf
Conclusion pg 42
The introduction and worldwide use of COVID-19 gene-based ‘vaccines’ has been associated, in the short term, with far more deaths, illnesses, injuries, and disabilities than any other therapeutic agent in the history of medicine. Due to the total lack of any long-term safety data, the potential future iatrogenic effects (including neurological, immunological and carcinogenic effects) may be even more devasting.
Despite initial claims, the COVID-19 gene-based ‘vaccines’ have now been shown to possess disappointing clinical efficacy - they neither prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection nor do they prevent transmission of the virus; any immunological protection wanes rapidly and, coincident with the emergence of the Omicron variant, evidence of negative vaccine efficacy is being reported in many countries including Australia.
In light of widely reported emerging and compelling evidence, there appears to be little scientific or clinical justification to support vaccine mandates as a health policy.
The latest hospital admission statistics do not support the claim that unvaccinated individuals are more at risk of serious COVID-19 disease, hospitalisation or death.
Excess non-COVID-19 related deaths coincident with the introduction of the gene-based ‘vaccines’ are now being reported by many countries, and suggest a surge in heart attack and stroke among both the young, adolescents and middle age individuals (especially males).
Advocating the worldwide use of a new class of serious COVID-19 gene-based ‘vaccines’ never before deployed, and advocated for use in healthy individuals of all
ages regardless of clinical status (eg. natural immunity, pregnancy etc), with relatively little short-term safety data and no long-term safety data, is neither prudent or necessary and defies the Precautionary Principle.
The knowledge that the synthetic mRNA in both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines can enter the nucleus of human liver cells in culture, raises the serious questions about genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, and adverse impact on future generations. Disturbing safety signals regarding fertility and miscarriages are emerging.
Given the statistically or virtually nil risk of serious COVID-19 in general affecting children aged 6 months to 11 or 12 years of age and the clear and significant risk of serious adverse effects including myocarditis, pericarditis and death in this age group – there seems to be little benefit to be gained by vaccinating these children.
Considerable scientific, clinical and statistical epidemiological data and understanding has been acquired since the introduction (on a provisional basis only) of the investigational COVID-19 gene-based “vaccines”. Many of the initial ambitious claims and assumed perceptions regarding the safety and efficacy of these serious therapeutics have now been invalidated and it is now time to review and reconsider the utility of these products in light of the known unprecedented level of serious adverse reactions and death attributed to their use.
The urgency for this review cannot be overestimated given the current and potential future impact on the health and wellbeing of all Australians. - Anonymous
Ms Jinx. The Constant and Consistent Advocate of these gene-based vaccines has to read this.
ReplyDeleteAnd bear full responsibility for all the consequences.
The mRNA vaccine did not go through the usual long term test that all other vaccines have to go through. It was a rush through decision, to push through it's use to corner the market, just in case China, Russia or other countries gets the head start. As a result, the human white mice are now paying the price.
ReplyDeleteFrom the start it was touted to prevent infection, and failed miserably. Then they changed the narrative and it was re-touted to prevent serious complications should those who are vaccinated gets infected, and it also failed. Millions still die and they blamed it on existing sicknesses.
Then people got suspicious and wanted to know what is inside the vaccine, but were prevented from getting to the root by frivolous contracts signed to prevent access to such information, and the Government could not do anything. Of course the Government cannot do anything, silly me. The Government and Big Pharma are in bed together. If Big Pharma gets convicted, it means the Governments have as much responsibility as an accomplice to the scheming.
What is in the Pfizer vaccine https://rumble.com/vnzy9f-shocking-dr.-carrie-madej-releases-first-look-at-pfizer-vial-contents.html
ReplyDelete