When horses were so important to the lives of cowboys, the only effective and efficient solution to stop horse stealing is the death penalty. Many countries learnt this lesson and make death penalty mandatory for drug peddling and smuggling offences. But many have gone soft on the legs and have done away with the death penalty.
Is the creating and patenting of viruses dangerous enough to be banned like horse thieves? Has the world had enough of pandemics? The creation and spreading of computer viruses have also reached a point when they could cripple the whole process of internet communication, ie kill the international communication network in industries and between nations. The failure of the internet caused by viruses could bring the whole world to a standstill. The proliferation of organic viruses could bring a natural disaster that would destroy billions of life forms.
When the risk and destructions are of unimaginable and unacceptable scale, would it be time to bring in the death penalty for anyone creating, spreading or transmitting viruses, organic or computer viruses, to remove these plagues against human civilisation once and for all?
No more creating, patenting and production of viruses of any kind, no need to keep creating and producing unproductive anti viruses softwares or vaccines unnecessarily. The only viruses that need to be dealt with would by from mother nature, not from human nature. Patenting of viruses must be banned, make a crime. The intent and purpose of patenting viruses are up to no good.
Hang everyone that produce or create viruses for the purpose of profit making. There would be lesser need for computer anti virus businesses and the resources can be better deployed in more productive areas. Same as in the creation of organic viruses that could lead to death and destruction of lives.
No more horse thieves, no more creator of viruses, organic and inorganic. Reduce the need for anti virus vaccines and softwares.
In my previous article I wrote about the clear signs and evidence that the covid19 virus was created by the Americans. Today, with the surge in Covid19 cases in countries using mRNA vaccines, it is enough evidence that this fake vaccine did not work, did not prevent infection. How many silly buggers are still calling for more booster shots using this fake vaccine?
Singapore’s top honchos are still calling for more booster shots, 3rd, 4th and/or 5th too. This is in regard with the use of the Pfizer or Moderna pseudo vaccines.
ReplyDeleteAnd who has been the champion of such use of the pseudo vaccines?
Your guess is as good as mine.
When "living and dying with Covid-19 means a record of 9,000 to 10,000 cases a day, we should know that the people in-charge of the COVID-19 infections haveb already thrown all of us under the buses and trains.
ReplyDeleteA group of American medical professionals have evidence that Moderna already had samples of the Covid19 virus before it started in Wuhan. They are going to sue Moderna for starting this pandemic.
ReplyDeleteToday they dare not talk about prevention of infection knowing that this would not work. So the excuse is that it would prevent serious illness and death. How to prove this?
ReplyDeleteWhy are there new computer viruses appearing regularly to infect computer systems? There must be people doing it full time. They can't be doing just for fun. It must be full time jobs and someone or companies must be paying them to create more viruses.
ReplyDeleteWho is profiting from these viruses? Follow the money and you cannot miss the real culprits behind it.
Seems many people knew who are really creating those computer viruses and benefitting from it. I always thought why would someone just wasting time and effort to write virus programs, just to infect someone else's computer for no benefit at all. Does not make sense.
ReplyDeleteSo, going by the same logic, who are creating those viruses affecting living things and laughing all the way to the bank. Already Monkeypox vaccines are coming onto the market, so fast and well timed, fueled by the WHO pronouncement that an emergency is arising.
By the way, why is Pfizer talking about more steps being made to improve the mRNA vaccine technology? So, are they telling us something we suspected all along, that the vaccine has failed and left much to be desired as a vaccine 'to prevent infection' that all other vaccines are expected to do, but failed to do so by the mRNA COVID19 vaccine.
Moderna and Pfizer are the two pharma companies that made the most money from the fake vaccines. But not one dares to sue them.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteAnything that can be used as weapon shall be invented and produce.
Just commonsense.
Period
ReplyDeleteLast month June,2022 my son and my wife were struck by Covid-19 inspite of having Three jabs of Pfizer vaccines inclusive of a booster. Fortunately they had recovered after taking some traditional Chinese herbal medicine. Also many of my friends and their family members some including whole family were similary struck by the virus inspite of having Three Jabs of Pfizer vaccines. What does all this tell us? Isn't it just a Western diabolical consspiracy to kill and reduce world population and at the same time to extort billions of dollars from the sale of their inefficacy fake vaccines. I personally suffered bad side effects with severe pains in my arms and joints for many months. Again I had to resort to taking Chinese traditional Chinese medicine to cure myself of the problem. Can the government help the affected people to sue Pfizer or Moderna for compensation.
Southernglory1
I had 3 shots of Sinopharm, barely any side effects. Not infected so far.
ReplyDeleteAnyone getting 3/4/5 shots of any vaccine and still can get infected only confirms that the vaccine is not effective. Period.
At 10,000 a day, in 10 days 100,000 would be infected.
ReplyDeleteIn 100 days, 1,000,000 would be infected.
In 365 days, 3,650,000 would be infected.
In less than 2 years, 6m would be infected.
Our population is less than 6m.
To cover their arses, they told us categorically that everyone will get COVID19, sooner or later. In other words, the vaccine failed and did not do it's work of giving protection, as all vaccines are meant to do. However, they covered this up smartly too by claiming the vaccine protects us from serious complications arising from the virus.
ReplyDeleteHow do complications arise and who are mostly affected? As I see it, the serious complications are mostly affecting the elderly and frail with inherent sicknessess when they got infected, with fatality more often than not attributed to their inherent sicknesses rather than the virus.
But weaponising the virus is so profitable, the narrative cannot be reversed, otherwise the balloon will pop. They have to keep on flogging the dead horse.
Birx, the White House COVID-19 response coordinator under former President Donald Trump, said during an appearance on Fox New:
ReplyDelete“I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection. And I think we overplayed the vaccines. And it made people then worry that it’s not going to protect against severe disease and hospitalization,”
Full article at:
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/birx-admits-covid-19-vaccines-were-never-going-protect-against-infection
Covid-19 vaccination for kids aged 4 and below to be ready around year end: MOH
ReplyDeleteCovid-19 vaccination for children aged between six months and four years will likely be ready towards the fourth quarter of this year, the Ministry of Health (MOH) said on Monday (July 25).
"MOH is currently doing the necessary preparation to roll out Covid-19 vaccines for young children aged between six months and four years old. We aim to have it ready towards the fourth quarter of the year," said a spokesman for the ministry.
This comes after two children aged up to four were reported to have died from Covid-19 over the past two months.
On June 27, MOH said a 1½-year-old boy with no past medical history and who was previously well had become the first coronavirus death in a patient aged under 12 in Singapore.
On July 17, a four-year-old girl died from the disease as well. She, too, had no past medical history and had initially tested negative on Covid-19 antigen rapid tests.
MOH said the rate at which children aged four and below are dying because of Covid-19 is comparable to other infectious diseases, such as pneumonia and influenza.
As at July 23, there were two Covid-19 deaths among children aged up to four, said MOH."This translates to three deaths per 100,000 cases (for children aged up to four), compared to 99 deaths per 100,000 cases for the 40 and above age group this year," added the ministry.
MOH said that before Covid-19, in 2018 and 2019, it recorded 3.1 deaths of children aged up to four per 100,000 people in a year from pneumonia and influenza.
"We have used 2018 and 2019 as a comparison as the public health measures rolled out during the Covid-19 pandemic have significantly reduced the numbers for pneumonia and influenza."
Children aged up to four are much more resilient than older patients, but more vulnerable compared to older children and young adults, MOH added.
Of the 1.7 million Covid-19 cases reported since the start of the pandemic, about 64,000, or 3.9 per cent, were children under five years old, MOH said.
It said the large majority of these 64,000 children recover uneventfully at home, with 0.022 per cent requiring oxygen supplementation or hospitalised in the intensive care unit (ICU).
In comparison, 0.17 per cent of patients in the 40 and above age group require ICU care.
The incidence rate of ICU care among those in the age group between five and 39 is almost negligible, MOH added.
The ministry said: "There is currently no clear evidence that Omicron variants cause more severe disease."
Severe cases among those aged four and below have been lower at 12 per 100,000 cases in 2022 compared with 41 per 100,000 cases last year, it noted.
News that the Covid-19 vaccine is likely to be rolled out for young children soon was welcomed by recruiter Evonne Ouyang, 32, whose son was born during the pandemic and will turn two next month.
“It will probably give me more peace of mind for him to go out and interact with others, especially since I’ve tried not to take him to crowded areas and delayed enrolling him in pre-school because of Covid-19."
She said the recent child deaths have encouraged her to get her son vaccinated.
Others like Ms Sheena Gow, 34, prefers to wait for more data to be released before deciding whether to let her daughters – aged eight months and three years – receive the vaccination.
“I’d prefer to see the data about its safety to assess whether the risks of severe side effects outweigh the benefits,” said the clinical research nurse, who is currently recovering from Covid-19.
To cut the long long story short, basically, the above narrative is attempting to trivialise the whole episode of DEATHS caused by Covid-19.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteAn online poll launched by the Global Times on Saturday asking respondents whether the UN Human Rights Council should conduct a field investigation into US human rights violations has drawn more than 247,000 participantsas of press time on Sunday, with over 96 percent supporting the proposition.
Specifically, about 81 percent of respondents voted "yes," saying that the issue of US human rights violations is very serious and requires further investigation. Another 15 percent of respondents also voted "yes," saying that the investigation would not happen as it would be strongly hindered by the US government. Around 4 percent of respondents voted that the US has long been plagued by human rights problems, saying an investigation will not change anything.
In answering the poll, many netizens left messages on the page to voice their support for a thorough investigation of the US' gross human rights violations. Some netizens said that "the US is doing a lot of things against humanity in the name of humanitarian actions" while some said "the US government is indifferent when its own people suffer from systematic violations of human rights but is keen to attack other countries under the guise of 'human rights.'"
On the Global Times Twitter account, some netizens said the so-called beacon of human rights does not shine a light on its dark history, and the US' move presents a vivid image of "a thief shouting to catch a thief."
It should have been, an Online Crook shouting, "Catch the Crook!"