Without gloating, with no admission from the Americans, the facts are staring down at the Americans. China has proven to be superior to the Americans in submarine warfare. How so?
China has about 100 submarines while the Americans have 70. China's submarines are concentrated in the East and South China Seas. This is like the hornet's nest for Chinese submarines. The American submarines are spread thinly all over the world, in the Pacific, Atlantic, Indian and the polar seas.
Another important aspect is the role of the submarines. They are attack ships and one of their main roles is to shadow aircraft carriers. The American submarines would be tracking and shadowing Chinese aircraft carriers and Russian warships as well. The Chinese submarines would be the tails of every American aircraft carrier and warship in the East and South China Seas.
How would these activities foretell who is more superior than the other? The Americans have been bragging about the superiority of their submarines vis a vis the Chinese and the Russians. Chinese submarines are noisy and easily detectable. Chinese submarine technology are inferior to the Americans. How then could a Chinese submarine popped up in the middle of an American wargame without being detected until it surfaced? The Americans were busy playing their wargame or sleeping?
The Chinese submarine surfaced by its own to prove to the Americans what it could do. It is another story if a submarine is forced to surface by an adversary warship or warplane. Every time an American aircraft carrier or warship enters the Chinese seas, you can bet the submarines would be there to meet them and to track them, with missiles ready to fire at them. Similarly, when the Liaoning or Shangdong aircraft carriers are in the East and South China Seas, the American submarines would be there tracking them. Both the Chinese and Americans would not let the aircraft carriers out of sight in case they turned mischievous.
In anti submarine warfare, both sides would be hunting the submarines and when detected, the submarines would be forced to surface or risk being hit by depth charges. There are certain rulings that both sides would abide by when detected and have to surface. So far no Chinese submarines were detected and forced to surface. And there are so many of them shadowing the American aircraft carriers in the Chinese seas. Recently, two American nuclear submarines were detected by Chinese warships and forced to surface in the South China Sea.
These incidents say that either the American submarines were noisy enough to be detected, or the Chinese anti submarine technology is superior enough to find them. And the fact is that relatively there were much fewer American submarines in the Chinese seas than the Chinese. And there were many more opportunities for the Americans to detect Chinese submarines tailing them but unable to do so.
The Chinese anti submarine warfare and technology thus have proven that they are superior to the Americans, definitely not inferior to the Americans. If one still has doubt, just recall the accident of USS Connecticut. This is the best the Americans have, the most expensive and the most sophisticated. The Americans claimed that it was so blind that it slammed into an undersea mountain. And the South China Sea was totally devoid of Chinese ships, not even a single Chinese fishing boat was around to see this monster floating and limping its way to Guam! Everyone would know that the whole of the South China Sea is filled with Chinese fishing boats and naval ships.
The truth is that the Chinese were tracking the USS Connecticut and could position a small drone submarine in its path without being detected by the Connecticut. And the Connecticut smashed into it and ended up with a bashed nose and had to float to the surface. The Chinese naval ships then escorted it half way to Guam. This incident was so embarrassing to the Americans that they had to lie about a blind super sub hitting a mountain in the South China Sea. They have berthed the Connecticut in Guam and now trying to fit a pair of spectacles for this super sub before letting it out in the ocean again. And the damage was so bad that it would take years before it is sea worthy to be mischievous again. Think it would not dare to appear in the South China Sea again.
They are very selfish. They could sacrifice a bit of their land to store the waste but choose to let the whole world suffer .
ReplyDeleteJohn Tan
Vice President
Singapore Kuda Club
Cc Chairman Singapore
Chairman international Chairman
Mr Kuda, I believe you must have put this in the wrong location?
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteWhile it
is good and desirable to have nations to stand up and counter bully, the Developments of too many high-tech warfare hardwares is not something positive.
Other than the lntention to use them, the Weapons themselves are prone to fall victims to natural disasters,
wear and tear as well as mis-handling.
I am of the View that
Mankind will ultimately end destroy themselves with their own doings.
I have no doubt
about
one reaps what one sows.
The kuda club must have let in a few donkeys.
ReplyDeleteHahahahha.
ReplyDeleteChina has class 94 95 and 96 submarine some very advance that can sink a aircraft carrier. So watch up.
ReplyDeleteJohn Tan
Singapore Kuda Club
When the F35 jet fell off the USA aircraft carrier's deck somewhere in the South China Sea, where it attempted to land, the USA was so desperate to make sure it does not fall into Chinese hands. They rushed to salvage it and finally used a Chinese built salvage vessel from a Singapore Marine operator to do it.
ReplyDeleteThe USA was highly surprised that the Chinese displayed little interest in attempting to get to it first. Why is the Chinese side not interested in such a highly hyped up and touted piece of machinery? Go figure!
China has class 94 95 and 96 submarine some very advance that can sink a aircraft carrier.
ReplyDeleteWhy would they sink an aircraft carrier? That would be the end of Beijing.
Benevolent China on the ascendancy, immoral West in decline . . .
ReplyDeleteChina seeks more island security pacts to boost clout in Pacific - FT
China is intensifying its drive for influence in the Pacific by negotiating security deals with two additional island nations following a pact with the Solomon Islands, according to officials in the US and allied countries.
Beijing’s talks with Kiribati, a Pacific island nation 3,000km from Hawaii where US Indo-Pacific Command is based, are the most advanced, the officials said.
“They are in talks with Kiribati and at least one more Pacific island country over an agreement that would cover much of the same ground as that with Solomon Islands,” said an intelligence official from a US ally.
One US official said China had set its sights on Kiribati for some time. “They’ve had on-and-off discussions on this, not just for months but for years,” said the official, who added that Beijing was trying to establish “strategic perches” on Pacific island nations.
In another sign Beijing is stepping up its push in the region, it sealed a deal with Vanuatu on Friday to upgrade an international airport in Luganville, a key US military base during the second world war.
A state department official said the US took concerns about security deals, including with Kiribati, “very seriously”. He said there were fears China was also negotiating with Tonga and Vanuatu.
China is also working with Kiribati to upgrade an airstrip on the archipelago’s Kanton Island.
So far no Chinese submarines were detected and forced to surface.
ReplyDeleteCould be that they stayed they didn't go too close.