The CIA had expanded its
mission against China. This has been openly announced by the Biden
Administration as well as the Chief of the CIA.
A new specially
organised and huge unit with its own headquarters has just been set up
to focus fully on China like previously during the US-USSR Cold War.
The US has now changed its stance against China, from strategic competitor to that of ENEMY.
Joe
Biden repeatedly said that the US is not going to start a Cold War with
China. In fact, the Trade War, Technology War, Legal War, and
Propaganda War have started during Trump's Presidency already.
Therefore, that means the Cold War had already begun.
Joe Biden is correct to say that the US is not going to start a Cold War with China because the Cold War has already started!
The US is in fact preparing to start a HOT WAR with China.
That's
why the US troops in Afghanistan and the Middle East are being pulled
out to pivot towards the South and East China Sea, for future
deployments in Australia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan
and Thailand. And possibly also to Myanmar and Cambodia.
That's why the CIA has been expanded to confront China in a more aggressive, deliberate, extensive and all-encompassing way.
In
addition, a special budget of US$300 million per year has been
allocated to smear and demonize China and spread falsehoods and false
flags against China. All the US mass media (including the BBC of UK) and
AFP. AP and Reuters - the three main news distributors - have also been
engaged and paid to research and produce articles detrimental to the
good name of China.
China must think of how to arrest the
imminent threats of the CIA and be prepared for an all-out war with the
Evil US Empire and Allies.
Better be prepared than to be caught with pants down like 150 years ago.
LIPS.
APEC 2024 Peru. Biden shafted to a corner in the back row. Xi in front row next to Peru's President
An all-out war between USA and China is inevitable. The USA has been preparing for it long long ago. It nearly bombed China with nuclear weapons for at least four occasions in the past.
ReplyDeleteChina must wake up. The expansion of the CIA to focus directly on China is not for nothing. There is going to be many groups of sleeper organisations created within China by the CIA in the next three years.
China better take the necessary actions to expand her counter-intelligence organisations and capabilities quickly.
Well done America and CIA, another African country, Sudan, is on fire. A coup and a military man took over the country and all the white men are congratulating him and supporting him. Millions of Sudanese are going to die of starvation given the coup and social unrest.
ReplyDeleteWhat must China do? Create a stronger counter insurgency unit, like the KGB and Mossad, in a tit for tat and fighting fire with fire. This is the only way to deal with the USA.
ReplyDeleteThe USA is still stoking the fire everywhere around the world. The recent assassination of Haiti President by elements trained by the CIA has been denied, but the facts points to them. The standoff in Myanmar has the fingerprints of the CIA deeply imprinted. Now Sudan is in turmoil and you just cannot discount the CIA's dirty hands in the coup.
ASEAN is next to implode. The future of peace and common prosperity in ASEAN looks bleaker by the day
Singapore is being used as the advanced guard to spearhead the collision and confrontation with Myanmar, using ASEAN as its front, the vanguard.
ReplyDeleteCIA agents and operatives have infiltrated and infested Singapore in many key and strategic areas, such as cybersecurity, banking and finance, trade and industry, legal profession and journalism and, most importantly, the admin and civil services.
Either someone is sleeping or deliberately allowed it to happen.
When China announced it's intention to be self reliant on most things, the West immediately came out with the narrative that this is a wrong move. They are playing reverse psychology, hoping to play China into their hands once again, of being dependent on the USA and the West for eg chips, semiconductors, and foundries for chip making.
ReplyDeleteChina had been caught in a bind in the short term and that is why Xi wants China to be self dependent in order to be most secure. The lesson has not been ignored by China.
150 years ago, China was at it's weakest, with civil wars, food shortages and most telling of which was not being prepared by having a strong military deterrent. Since the time of Cheng He, in the 14th and 15th century, when China was a maritime power,
China had, since then, exhibited peaceful co-existence with smaller states and thought that it's peaceful behavior would be reciprocated. China did not count on the belligerent stance of the Whites and Japs and fell victim to their warmongering intentions.
China must endure and grow stronger against all odds and, above all, be prepared for all eventualities. China must not let it's guard down nor fall for the propaganda of the West out to destroy it.
From TRE:
ReplyDeleteMedical Tyranny:
"Designate a public enemy. Paint them as responsible for society’s ills. Pass ever-increasing punitive measures against them, all the while expanding the power of the state, in the name of protecting the people. Every step of the way, the public will cheer you on."
Adolf Hitler. Josef Stalin. Mao Ze Dong. Dictators and tyrants across history have employed this stratagem to great effect. And now it has come to Singapore.
Singapore announced new Covid measures yesterday following a spike in transmissions. These include:
Home recovery protocol as the norm for Covid patients, except for partially or unvaccinated individuals aged 50 and older, vaccinated people aged 80 and older, children below one year old, and children between one to four years old assessed to be clinically unsuitable for home recovery.
Unvaccinated people are barred from shopping malls, attractions, hawker centres and coffee shops. They can still buy takeaway food and visit large standalone supermarkets.
Fully vaccinated people are only allowed in these places as individuals or in pairs.
The government claims that this will ‘protect the unvaccinated and reduce the strain on the healthcare system’. A deeper investigation reveals that this claim is absurd.
Singapore’s Covid mortality rate is 0.125% (153 deaths out of 124157 cases). The overwhelming majority of Covid deaths in Singapore occur among patients above the age of 60 with 2 or more comorbidities. Outside that demographic, deaths and critical illnesses are extremely rare.
By allowing patients that don’t require specialist medical treatment to self-isolate and recover at home, this reduces the strain on the healthcare system.
In Singapore, living in family units is the norm, as is living in multi-generational family units. In families of mixed vaccination status, self-isolation and home recovery will expose the unvaccinated and partially vaccinated to the disease. Similarly, in families that have not been vaccinated, everyone at home will be exposed to the virus.
It is more difficult to isolate a patient with a contagious disease at home than in a hospital with a specially-designed contagious disease ward and well-trained and -equipped staff. I will not be surprised if home-based clusters will form next.
If Covid were so mild that even the unvaccinated can be allowed to recover at home as the default, why should they be subject to more stringent rules in the first place?
Why do they even need ‘protection’?
Why do they need to be protected from the protected who took the protection so they can be protected against the virus?
Why bar unvaccinated people from indoor spaces?
ReplyDeleteThe US CDC claims that the unvaccinated are 11 times more likely to die than the vaccinated. However, given that the mortality rate of Covid in Singapore is just 0.123%, such a figure is statistically meaningless.
Should an unvaccinated person who is not in the at-risk demographic catch the virus, he is extremely likely to recover. Upon recovery, he gains natural immunity, which is 13 times more effective than the Pfizer vaccine against the Delta variant.
With the Delta variant of Covid, there is no difference in viral load between a vaccinated and unvaccinated carrier. The only difference is severity of symptoms, and even then, only for 6 months at best. This means that a vaccinated carrier is just as contagious as an unvaccinated carrier.
Why bar unvaccinated people from indoor spaces?
This is an extremely onerous restriction due to Singapore’s geography. Urban Singapore is designed along its roads and public transportation network. Buses and trains connect every major neighbourhood and urban centre to every corner of the country. In 2020, the MRT and LRT train networks saw a daily ridership of 2.162 million, while bus ridership was measured at 2.878 million a day. Every major bus interchange and train station terminates at or near a shopping mall.
In some places, the train station or bus station is integrated directly into the mall: exiting requires passing through the mall premises, or else taking a very long roundabout route. In the downtown area, some stations have underground shopping arcades, which may or may not be counted as a mall under these new rules.
The shopping mall is the heart of Singapore’s urban life. Eateries, childcare centres, medical clinics, supermarkets, hairdressers, gyms and other vital and essential services are embedded in the malls. These rules bar unvaccinated people from essential, urgent and vital services in urban areas.
The unvaccinated can still visit small standalone shops. Most of these, however, are sited in and around older public housing estates. Accessibility is far limited compared to malls with bus and train services, especially for Singaporeans who cannot afford their own vehicles.
Reducing the accessibility of medical services during a pandemic is counterproductive to ending it.
Reducing the accessibility of other vital and urgent private and public services further compounds the misery of the people for little gain.
With so many retail jobs concentrated in malls, banning unvaccinated people from malls means that every unvaccinated worker of the mall or shops within the mall must also be let go or placed on indefinite leave. As far as I can tell, there is no exception for such workers. At the same time, the government has also made it illegal for companies to fire workers solely because of their vaccination status.
This presents a legal difficulty, one that has clearly not been thought through.
Depriving Unvaccinated Form Hawker Centres Is Cutting Off The Lifeline Of Singapore Oldies
ReplyDeleteIt is probable that these frontline workers will continue to operate under the current vaccinate or test regime, or an even more stringent version of it. Nonetheless, there is still nothing in the news about this. Expect unvaccinated workers to be fired anyway, because this law gives unscrupulous bosses an excuse to do it. Even if mall workers were allowed to get tested instead, the cost of each test must be borne by the employer or employee. No matter which way the government leans, the livelihoods of frontline workers and their families will be seriously affected.
Hawker centres are another critical component of Singaporean life. These are food courts that offer cheap and quickly-cooked food, the staple for the busy working professional. Hawkers run on tight profit margins, relying on volume of sales to make a living. Earlier pandemic measures that forced hawker centres to switch entirely to takeaway cratered the income of hawker stores. Many of these hawkers are senior citizens with little grasp of technology or the English language, and thus are shut out from food delivery platforms. Food delivery apps also charge a fee for delivery, forcing hawkers to either raise their prices or eat massive losses. To save the hawkers, the government relaxed the rules for hawker centres earlier this year. Reducing the number of patrons so dramatically will send shock waves through the hawker centres once again, further reducing their income.
The overall effect of these measures is to shut out unvaccinated people from most public spaces. In so doing, it causes significant knock-on effects to small businesses and lower-income families—precisely the same groups that have been and continue to be hit hardest by government responses to the pandemic.
The true tragedy of all is that this will not influence Covid transmission the way the government thinks it will.
99% of Covid transmissions take place indoors, or even as high as 99.9%. By banning unvaccinated people from public spaces, the virus will spread among vaccinated people instead—and in homes with recovering patients.
The vaccine reduces severity of symptoms, and asymptomatic Delta carriers can spread the virus. An unvaccinated person who catches the virus and develops symptoms knows he is sick. He will then be likely to seek medical attention and isolate himself. A vaccinated person who catches the virus but does not develop symptoms will not know he is sick, unless he goes the extra mile and spends the extra money to test himself regularly. This means an asymptomatic person is likely to continue spreading the virus, oblivious to that fact that he is a carrier.
The vaccine is non-sterilizing. It does not kill the virus completely. It does not even prevent transmission. It could even worsen transmission. As Malo Gato notes, it’s possible that the vaccinated are driving the spread of the disease. With these new rules, Singapore is likely to see this over the coming weeks and months. Unlike superspreaders of other diseases, a vaccinated Covid Patient Zero will not develop symptoms, and statistically a number of patients around him won’t either, so it becomes even more difficult to contain the infection.
How will the government ‘protect the unvaccinated and reduce the strain on the healthcare system’ by introducing policies that increase the likelihood of silent superspreader events?
The answer is simple: It’s not meant to do that.
The purpose of these policies is to place even more pressure on the unvaccinated. By systematically shutting them out of urban life, the government aims to coerce them into taking experimental ‘vaccines’ that do not stop the spread of the targeted disease and are vastly more dangerous than all vaccines combined.
Typo Error: Title, should read as:
DeleteDepriving Unvaccinated From Hawker Centres Is Cutting Off The Lifeline Of Singapore Oldies
Thanks for the correction.
DeleteCAVEAT EMPTOR:
ReplyDeleteThe above three articles are not written by me. It is half of an article which I have lifted from TRE.
Because of the limitation of 4096 characters in this comments section, I have divided it into three parts and gave it three different headings.
To read the full and elaborate article, please go to TRE website.
BTW, the TRE is tentatively projected to be closed down by February next year.
Or you can go to the original writer Benjamin Cheah's website;
ReplyDeletewww.benjamincheah.com
@SSO - No need to kanchong so much. Just call Grab or Deliveroo lah.
ReplyDeleteUSA is nothing good for anywhere and any country in the world. That has been a proven fact for the last 70 years. How many wars have they started and how many innocents have they killed? They are probably about to start wars within ASEAN soon.
ReplyDeleteIt is easy to invite the devil into the house, but not easy to get rid of it.
Singapore backside is itchy. Asking for trouble, for total destruction. The leaders are reckless as exposed by the Covid management, the over-reliance on the US, never learnt lesson from what the British did when Japan attacked Singapore, destroying ASEAN by discarding the Principle of Non-Interference. Also lack of foresight. Always depending on hindsight. Typically bookworms scholarships grabbing type.
ReplyDeleteSingapore has happily breached the 5,000 mark reward of Covid-19 Cases. For opening her legs wide wide for the Americans, Europeans and Indians big dickies, Sinkies are rewarded with 5,324 infections and ten more 'murdered' by courtesy of the Mother-The-Fcuker.
ReplyDelete