Senior
members of Singapore’s ruling People’s Action Party are concerned that
mixed signals from the country’s virus task force are giving the
appearance of divisions that could lead to rare infighting, people
familiar with the situation said.
The party cadres, who decide
which individuals are admitted to the PAP’s top decision making body,
were concerned perceptions of a split could spur members to choose sides
in the informal contest to succeed Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong,
whose plans to step aside were delayed amid the pandemic after his
heir-apparent bowed out earlier this year. They said the prime minister
or another senior member should take charge and show decisiveness,
according to the people.
Lee’s disrupted succession plan --
unusual in a country used to orderly transitions -- has added more
pressure on the PAP as it looks to keep the economy on track while
dealing with rising concerns about foreign workers in the financial hub.
Although the party prolonged its nearly six-decade rule in an election
last year, the opposition gained a record number of seats.
While
the virus task force and Lee’s cabinet make key decisions and implement
them as a team, Finance Minister Lawrence Wong and Health Minister Ong
Ye Kung have noticeably focused on different aspects of the pandemic
response in recent public comments as the country announced stop-start
changes in its reopening plan. Wong has generally appeared to favor
tighter measures to contain the virus, while Ong is seen as a greater
advocate for opening. Both are regarded as prime contenders to one day
take power from Lee.
The disquiet in the party reflects a broader
debate within Singapore society about the pace of opening up, even as
it boasts one of the world’s highest vaccination rates. The Southeast
Asian financial hub has sought to balance the need to resume
international travel and domestic activity with keeping overall
mortality rate low, leading to abrupt shifts in policy on issues like
working from home and dining out.
Anonymous
What debate?
ReplyDeletePAP has been a Dictatorship all the while, where got debate?
Whoever dares to go against the Party's Leeder of Sheep will get whipped by the Party Whip.
Just like debates in Parliament, they talk rooster disagreements, sounded genuinely concerned, but vote in unison. Disagree for what?
ReplyDeleteOr in order not to vote against, they retire to the toilet and do not participate in voting. Good actors agreeing to disagree in style.
ReplyDelete