It’s okay sometimes politics defies logic. Let’s move on. Get your vaccine against discrimination if need be.
The
above quote is from a comment by a Politics Defies Logic in TRE. This
comment shows the ridiculous nature of this pandemic, turning it into an
exercise of oppression. All the logic turns out to be a farce and all
the questionable illogic carted out as logic. And the daft sheep were
simply be marched into the slaughter house, initially sheepishly without
protest but now feeling cheated and started to whine for being misled
by well trained but equally mindless sheep dogs.
For
whatever reasons that were not spoken, the whole thing is looking like a
get rich quick scam for the pharmaceutical companies at the expense and
well being of the unthinking masses. Looking from a bird's eye view,
it is western vaccines and nothing else. It is a new order of American
or western dominance in the use of vaccines in a world pandemic. Only
the newly created mRNA vaccines, still in a very preliminary stage of
trials that would normally take years to complete is touted as the
silver bullet with unquestionable efficacy of 95% against Covid19 virus!
And they swallowed it all, hook, line and sinker. No one in his right
mind would want to question salesman talk and salesman promises. Worse,
they were all behind this scam, telling and coercing the daft that mRNA
is the vaccine to save the world.
Even today,
with so many revelations that make it looking more like a farce, no more
claims of 95% efficacy, and effectiveness fading away in 3 to 6 months,
no one is standing up to admit that he is a sucker, cheated by the
pharmaceutical companies in their wild claims based on their own trials,
own data and own shit. Some gullible are starting to feel the heat,
feeling being cheated and fearing what would happen to them if the
contrarian narrative comes true.
Why was
traditional method of producing inactivated vaccines frown upon, coerced
and forbidden from use? Why the discrimination against the use of
proven method vaccines that are safe but going for something that is
basically untested and with manufacturers demanding exemption clauses to
free them from responsibility from adverse events? Does this ring a
bell that something is not right? Trust me, just drink?
Why
make the use of inactivated virus vaccines unavailable or difficult to
access to? Why all the discrimination against such vaccines, against
people who are unavaccinated when being vaccinated did not really make
much difference in terms of being infected and being spreader of the
virus? Why creating so many barriers against people who are not
vaccinated as if they are the spreader of the virus when the truth is
just the reverse?
The mRNA vaccines is now more
like a vaccine against discrimination than against the virus as it did
really nothing in preventing infection and preventing transmission. The
only thing that it is effective is to prevent discrimination so the once
vaccinated, one can dine in restaurants, participate in big events,
maybe no need to wear masks, and can be a happy go lucky super spreader
of the virus.
Is this what the vaccines are
really for? Or is this part of the sinister scheme of putting a mark on
the forehead by a group of evil men?
The CEO of the Pfizer vaccine has recently warned that the company will have to discontinue the production of the present mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. He did not give any reason why, except that because in due course, more and more Variants will render the Pfizer vaccine no more viable. And the US Pfizer company is looking into producing a new vaccine that will counter all variants of coronavirus.
ReplyDeleteIs the Pfizer CEO now looking for an escape route, after pocketing $billions of daft governments' money?
ReplyDeleteThe 1.6 million doses of Moderna's vaccine were withdrawn for containing particles of stainless steel, likely due to misaligned bottling components.
At least two Japanese women who have been vaccinated with the contaminated Moderna vaccine have died.
There is intense competition in the traditional method of producing vaccines, so they have to invent new methods that others have, until then, not concentrating on. That is the story, but of course they have lots more to argue about, including the fact that they are able to pay experts to support their course.
ReplyDeleteThe point again is, money talks and bullshits walk. Any need for further arguments?
More Big Money-Making Booster Shots From mRNA Vaccines Producers
ReplyDeleteAn apple a day keeps the doctor away. However, a vaccine a day keeps the doctor coming after you again and again in disarray.
With the latest Covid-19 Delta Variant infections creating havoc in the US, upending Americans' decadent lifestyle yet again, an official rollout of 3rd and 4th booster doses could begin within weeks.
"It's likely that three doses of the vaccine are needed for full protection," Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Chief US Health Adviser, said after probably having been bribed heavily by the mRNA vaccines producers.
He cited two Israeli-based studies that showed a decrease in infections among people who got a third or fiurth booster shot. But he refused to reveal the negative findings of the Pfizer vaccine by the same Israeli studies on the Pfizer vaccine.
Misinformation and disinformation are the key notes of this Panick-driven Vaccination Campaign throughout the world. Governments and experts are together in this business of creating fear upon the populace and then force the gullible and daft people to be vaccinated but hypocritically telling them that it's on a voluntary basis, so as to cover their own ass in case the mRNA vaccines turned out to be dangerous instead of helpful.
Singapore incorporated is also picking up the opportunity to go for a third booster shot, starting with the immune deficiency people. Such an opportunity to make more money must not go to waste.
More infections and deaths have been deliberately allowed to happen so as to help increase the sales and usage of the experimental mRNA vaccines.
Who stands to benefit from the increased usage of the Pfizer and Modena vaccines in Singapore?
Being a heavy investor in the two profit-driven and irresponsible companies, Temasek Holdings and GIC may be the winners?
Then who are the losers?
Think.
LIPS.
Covid started because human put fire cracker in a pine apple for a pregnant elephant to eat.
ReplyDeleteToday human let croc.eat fiery battery
From drone.human deserve more.
I believe Singapore not accepting fully the Sinovac and Sinopharm vaccines could be due to political pressure from the US and also Temasek big investment in Pfizer.($250M)
ReplyDeleteThe real time result has proven the mRNA vaccines in which the Pfizer vaccines are based on, is ineffective against the Delta variants and countries that had near full vaccination on them are experiencing surge in infection with Israel going for the 3rd booster shots for its citizens. So it makes no difference for the committee to dismiss the Chinese because of low trial efficacy.
The government needs Pfizer to do well so that TH could reap a positive returns, thus the all out support and deny those going for alternatives the convenience in taking the inactivated vaccines by excluding them as part of the national program. Many people, including seniors have found they are in the queue at private clinics indefinitely as the Chinese vaccines had run out and awaiting for supplies. If the goverment is seriously wanting all to get vaccinated, they could have included them in the program. Makes no sense.
And its no coincidence that countries and regions that are US allies, good friends or sychophants are not having the Chinese vaccines. That includes Asian nations like Japan, Korea, Taiwan even though China is close by and supplies could be sourced readily. I suspect US or Pfizer could be pressuring Singapore in not using the Chinese vaccines just like Huawei in the 5G rollout.
Singapore, in order not to offend China which is the largest trading partner, decided to approve the vaccines when WHO approved them but made it less convenient or discourage locals from taking them. So one could see the discrimination in not only measures against those unvaccinated but also those having different vaccines.
Are these reasons plausible?
When a country is on the decline, it tends to join the group of countries that are also on the decline. This is due to the habitual tendency accumulated in the past.
ReplyDeleteOnly leaders with wisdom and vision will anticipate and foresee what is coming in the next 50 years.
These leaders are hard to come by nowadays. Most of the present day politicians are arrogant, self-centred, with shot-gun mentality, short sightedness and lack of wisdom. But very cunning to protect their own ass.
A Singaporean man who lost his job as a PMET in a Singapore bank to foreigners wrote:
ReplyDelete“I would advise all Singaporeans to forget about applying for any PMET job in Singapore. You will do well to take up the PAP’s advice and become a hawker, Grab driver, food deliveryman, security guard, cleaner or some s**t”.
“If you do not want to do that and want to wish for a PMET job, vote out this government. There is simply no other option”, he said.
And I fully agree with him. I also lost my IT job to CECA Indians from India.
Well, they should follow the lead of Hougang and vote and continue to vote for the Opposition. But they sit tight and thought the good jobs and good days will never end. Now they pay the price.
ReplyDeleteSuffice to say, even voting for Opposition is too little too late. They have to live with their choice. Who is to be blamed? The PAP? Who put them there?
Redbean,
ReplyDeleteWhat do you think mRNA stand for in Singapore given PAP's track records of lying and bullshitting ? Now, want people to take more and more vaccine , and make more money for Temasek since it invest much money into vaccine-making company.
mRNA => More Ridiculous Nonsensical Andidote
Must do something to the 61% who make us suffer under the hands of the 3000 PAP elites and elitist.
ReplyDeleteThe CEO of the Pfizer vaccine has recently warned that the company will have to discontinue the production of the present mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
ReplyDeleteWhen did he say this and in what time frame? When the Pfizer vaccine was developed, it was always understood to be an emergency use vaccine to protect against the original Covid strain.
Pfizer told you their vaccine is for emergency use only? You nuts?
ReplyDeleteYes, Pfizer openly declared that the mRNA vaccines it produced within 10 months of development and short trials, without the usual rigorous and prolonged requirements, is ONLY FOR EMERGENCY USE.
ReplyDeleteIn addition, Pfizer also make governments sign the sale/Purchase Agreement with a "No Responsibility Clause" to absolve itself of any claim or law suit if something goes wrong with the Experimental Vaccine.
Pfizer also make governments sign an agreement not to divulge the above agreement.
Pfizer also make many desperate and stupid governments pay and pay in advance, again and again, by batches for the monopolised expensive experimental vaccine.
Pfizer also reserves the rights to incresse the price as it deems fit.
Your government also follow Pfizer by making you sign a "No Claim" agreement and declared that you allowed yourself to be injected with the Pfizer experimental vaccines voluntarily.
Despite all that have been laid out by Pfizer or leaked out by whistle blowers, you must really be nuts if you have allowed yourself to be experimental guinea-pigs of an emergency vaccine that was developed using a new technology which is still fraud with suspicions and diverse opinions oc professional scientists and doctors.
Pfizer-BioNTech - The Most Cunning Modern Money-Making Machine (5M) In The World
ReplyDeleteThe COVID-19 vaccine developed by Pfizer-BioNTech has been a blazing and stunning success in every aspect, though not respect. Already made more than US$20 billion within months, it is now poised to make at least US$35 billion by end of this year.
Through its skillful and ingeniously crafted legal documents of sales and purchase, and with the help of many highly desperate, gullible and willing government leaders, Pfizer-BioNTech has more or less dominated and monopolised the world's Covid vaccines market, and won the vaccines war together with Moderna.
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said last week that the company's scientists are now researching every coronavirus variant that emerges to determine if it "can escape the protection of our vaccine."
Bourla said that so far no such variant has been found.
Then he added, "But we believe that it is likely that one day, one of them will emerge."
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky agree with Bourla's view.
Rochelle Walensky, probably in the sexret payroll of Pfizer, stated in July 2021:
"These vaccines operate really well in protecting us from severe disease and death, but the big concern is that the next variant that might emerge - just a few mutations away - could potentially evade our vaccines."
Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Chief. edical Advisor to President Biden, is also concerned about vaccine-resistant variants. He warned in an interview in early August that there could be an "ample chance" for a variant to emerge that current vaccines won't be nearly as effective against.
Birds of the same feather always flock together, especially so when they are free to drop their droppings everyday everywhere from high up in the sky and nobody can do or refuse to do anything about it.
Some independent self-indulgent healthcare experts outside the US are quick to support the 'doomsday' view.
On 26 July 2021, a group of scientists in the UK released an analysis that stated it's "almost certain" that coronavirus variants will emerge "that eventually leads to current vaccine failure."
All of these depressing and negative opinions might sound like it is hopeless to depend on the present mRNA vaccines to fight the Covid-19 coronavirus.
However, CEO Bourla sees this as another opportunity to make more money. He is confident of Pfizer's ability to rapidly adapt to any new variants.
He revealed, "We have built a process that within 95 days from the day that we identify a variant as a variant of concern, we will be able to have a vaccine tailor-made against this variant."
That's a remarkably quick turnaround from the first identification of a potential variant that's resistant to current vaccines to the development of a new vaccine that can fight the new variant.
Bourla's time frame doesn't include the testing that would be required for any new vaccine version.
Pfizer and BioNTech are not alone in the ability to respond quickly to emerging variants. Moderna President Stephen Hoge said in his company's second-quarter conference call that it's likely for significant increases in breakthrough infections to occur with the Moderna vaccine. But he added that Moderna is being vigilant in responding to new variants.
There is another good opportunity for Pfizer (also for BioNTech and Moderna) to make more money, if variants that are resistant to current vaccines appeared. The scenario would increase the demand for newer vaccines that could provide protection against the new variants. Such a situation fits finely into the greater schemes of things within the Pfizer CEO's grand slam strategy.
Continues.....
Queen of Hearts.
Continues from above.
ReplyDeleteMessenger RNA (mRNA) technology offers a way to rapidly develop new vaccines that hold the potential to be effective against emerging variants. As the leaders in mRNA vaccines, Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna would be the most likely to be able to quickly develop and test new vaccines to replace current vaccines.
It is also possible that the coronavirus might not mutate enough to render current the vaccines ineffective, especially with those vaccines produced in China and Russia. However, if it ever happens, the leading vaccine producing machines would soar even higher than they already have.
No wonder they have gone all out, out of the normal, to discredit and demonise the traditional vaccines produced by China, India and Russia!
The world now is not only being ruled by the 5-Eyes but also by the 5M!
Help Us, God!
Queen of Hearts.
They also signed a clause that said, if there are existing medical conditions in a person, and if death occurs after vaccination, they must put the cause of death as due to the existing medical conditions, not due to the vaccines.
ReplyDeleteSo, a person may have many medical conditions but would not die but died after vaccinated, it is the medical conditions that caused his death, not the vaccine.