A BBC reporter asked China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi why China is supporting Argentina in claiming the return of the Falklands Islands. He said China is so far away and Falklands have nothing to do with China. China should mind its own business.
Wang Yi told him Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan are so far away from England and the US and have nothing to do with them. They should also mind their own business.
China has not only stood up but has declared that it would support the causes of oppressed and victimised countries and people against white supremacy and hegemony, bullying and oppression. China has identified 17 islands still under the control of the white colonialist and would support the cause for their return to the original natives of the islands. And this includes the return of the Ryukyu Islands.
In his speech on the centenary of the CCP, Xi Jinping said China would not be bullied by any country. Anyone trying to do so would be bashed. This is a warning to all the little dogs and cats, the cronies and lackeys of the evil American Empire, especially those in Asean, that they would be caned very harshly if they try.
China is now taking its rightful place as a super power and also the defender of the weak nations against white supremacists and hegemony. China would not only speak up, but would support and act on this commitment as the leader of the developing nations. China is willing and ready to commit military forces to the defend the oppressed countries of the world.
China's wolf warrior diplomacy is now not only defending China against the attacks by the West but also defending the rest of the world by the West. The West have been accusing China of aggressiveness when they were whacking China daily with all kinds of wild allegations and fake news. They did not know what is an aggressive China yet. Now they are going to see China standing up into their faces and poking into their eyes to protect the victims of the West.
The West think it is their right to oppress and suppress and bully the rest to the world. This is the past, no more. China, as a responsible leader of the world, would stand up for what is right and would defend the weak against the bulllies and gangsters. Now the West would know what is an aggressive and responsible China. They want China to play a bigger and more responsible role in world affairs. China is stepping into the plate.
From now on, China would not be the defensive party, taking the blows. China would be the initiator and would redress the injustice committed by the West against the countries and people of the world.
Welcome to a New World Order that not only the West can do the shouting and bullying, China would not allow that and would also be shouting back. There is now a level playing field and injustice and inequality of the past would have to cease. There would be a rule of law for all countries. No more lawlessness of the American and western hegemony.
About 70 percent of the Falklands Islands' population are of British descent, primarily as a result of Scottish and Welsh migration to the islands. As then Argentine ambassador to the UK Alicia Castro said in 2012, "This is a special case that involves a colonial territory, not a colonized population; its inhabitants are not the original people of the islands. It is a population installed by Britain after 1833."
ReplyDeleteThe same situation applies to Australasia. Both Australia and New Zealand should be returned to the indigenous people, according to UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 where the goal of eliminating all forms of colonialism was established.
ESM Goh Chok Tong said that there can be no real regional cooperation if China does not have the confidence and trust of its neighbours.
ReplyDeleteHow China conducts its diplomacy does shape how others view China. Achieving real cooperation requires more than a change in the tone, style and language of public communications.
https://sgmatters.com/no-real-regional-cooperation-if-china-does-not-have-trust-of-its-neighbours-esm-goh/
#China #global #trust
Who is going to listen to him? Who is he?
ReplyDeleteWho is he? One who started the FT policy and Indian fever at the same time. That caused much unhappincess among the PMET citizen workforce that Parliament has to debate on this subject this week even nearly 15 years on. From his trajectory and speeches, he is more pro India than pro China.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHe is a twit but thinks he is very important.
ReplyDeleteArgentina was also victim of very cruel mistreatment under the Spanish colonisers. Lands were seized and given to their own kind and cronies, the result that massive farmland were awarded and monopolised by favoured parties. Natives of Argentina, North America, Canada and Australia should start to fight for their land, which were stolen by force by the evil Whites.
ReplyDeleteThe Brits and USA have no shame to talk about China bringing up the Falklands.
He has never been known as a thinker or a man of political wisdom.
ReplyDeleteThe Americans had never visited him for advice on China affairs, not even on Indian affairs.
A big gasbag perhaps. Goal 2010? Swiss Standard of Living?
ReplyDeleteThey thought he could help the PAP to retake Potong Pasir and Hougang, with him boasting that the chikus and papayas are ripe for the picking. They all went up in smoke instead. Potong Pasir only went back to PAP because of Chiam's ill health and his departure from the constituency.
Funny, everyone knows, but he doesn't.
ReplyDeleteHe is trying to show the Chinese that he is better than Xi Jinping. He is also carrying the Ang Moh's balls because his only daughter has been married to a foreigner and stayed in UK, a quitter of his own description.
ReplyDeleteFor a dying person to talk bad about another country, something is not right. I think he simply talks without thinking. His brain is fixated to the past, unable to think or assiminate new ideas.
ReplyDeleteIn Response To Goh Chok Tong's Criticism of China - Please Do Justuce For Singaporeans
ReplyDelete"ESM Goh Chok Tong said that there can be no real regional cooperation if China does not have the confidence and trust of its neighbours.
How China conducts its diplomacy does shape how others view China. Achieving real cooperation requires more than a change in the tone, style and language of public communications.
https://sgmatters.com/no-real-regional-cooperation-if-china-does-not-have-trust-of-its-neighbours-esm-goh/ "
Why is Goh Chok Tong, a Singaporean of Chinese descent and enjoyed the support of the Chinese People in Singapore, having no trust and confidence in China, while at the same time showed a lot of trust, confidence and even love in India and Indian customs?
What has/have made him trust and confide in India but does not trust nor confide in China?
Is he telling all of us, especially the Chinese people in Singapore and the rest of the World, that he has been a traitor to the Chinese People and the Chinese Civilization all these while?
The more Goh Chok Tong speaks ill of China, the more he loses whatever little respect that we still accord to him because of his mediocre and highly expensive services to Singapore. He is behaving as he has said before, Bo Tua Bo Suay.
If he is wise enough to know that his time is over the hill, he would do well to stop speaking badly about other people and other countries.
To do justice to Singapore and for the people of Singapore, the only bad things that we welcome Goh Chok Tong to tell us is how he had screwed up all of us with the perennial escalating costs of living due to his bad policies that deliberately increased costs and pricing on the one hand while depressing wages on the other - such as his introduction of the CPF fixed returns of 2.5% interest rate instead of the variable 8-10% previously promised by the Pioneer leaders, and his introduction of the COE, the ERP, the enhanced HDB Pricing, the get-rich-quick Ministerial salary and bonuses, the creation of lob-sided CECA in favour of India, the import of foreign trash from 3rd world countries disguised as foreign talents, the lowering of educational qualifications by accepting inferior and fake degrees from India, etc. etc.
He has also to shoulder the responsibility of what he did and account to all Singaporeans all the ills that he has brought upon us, not just the self-praising stuffs he has projected in his two books: Tall Order and Standing Tall.
To do justice to us, he should write an antithesis called the "Tall Unfulfilled Promises", depicting all the unfulfilled promises he had made to us as the 2nd Prime Minister of Singapore, e.g. Swiss Standards of Living, More Good Years, Growing Old Graciously, Goal 2010, etc. etc.
In addition, of course, he has to be responsible to write about all the ills that have been inflicted upon us that are caused by his love for India and everything Indian, specifically on the unfairness of the CECA.
Only then will justice be done, not all but at least some.
Queen of Hearts.
RB, please help me to correct the typo error of the word Justice at the Title of my article. Thanks.
DeleteThe recent intl survey on how China is viewed by the developed countries shows Singapore is the only one which view China favorably-70%. Undoubtedly, he is out of sync and touch with most Singaporeans. Biased personal view being treated like that from a respected political pundit. Glad he isn'the the PM. Look at LHL, manages to say all correct and right things about China after the SAF vehicle incident in HK port.
Deletehttps://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2021/06/29/temasek-holdings-legal-counsel-other-prominent-lawyers-among-victims-of-singapores-largest-financial-scam/
ReplyDeletehttps://www.tremeritus.net/2021/07/04/glorious-aholes/
https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/singapore-traders-lavish-lifestyle-allegedly-fuelled-us740m-fraud
After all the hu hu ha ha, davider singh appear. Ta da. Tik tok khaby lame lai liao. Yawnz.
https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2021/07/05/lee-govt-should-not-point-fingers-at-imaginary-bogeyman-after-failing-to-put-interests-of-sporean-pmets-first/
ReplyDeleteAnd the article say there is no bogey man. And the comments is targeted at who? And also the siblings also target at who?
Senators decline to label China's treatment of Uyghurs a genocide
ReplyDeletePrime Minister Justin Trudeau and almost all of his cabinet colleagues were absent for that vote. Foreign Affairs Minister Marc Garneau was the only cabinet minister present. He abstained when it was his turn to vote, saying he did so "on behalf of the government of Canada."
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-canada-vote-china-genocide-1.6084640
More than 1,000 Afghan soldiers have fled to neighbouring country Tajikistan after clashing with the Taliban militants.
ReplyDeleteThe troops retreated over the border to save their own lives.
Fighting has risen in Afghanistan and the Taliban have been making significant gains, particularly in the north of the country, in recent weeks.
The surge comes as the US, UK and allies withdraw their troops after 20 years of occupation, just like the Vietnam War.
China's Sinovac Vaccine has proven itself in Singapore to have much less side-effects.
ReplyDeleteAs of 3 July (Saturday), more than 17,000 people have taken the first jab and there has been only two cases of reactions to the Chinese vaccine after one week. Both of them developed rashes but not serious. This was revealed by the Health Minister in Parliament on Monday, yesterday. That means the Chinese vaccine is more superior than the Western vaccines that use the new, experimental mRNA technology.
The big question now is:
What good reason does the Experts Committee has that it failed to recommend the Sinovac vaccine for inclusion into the National Vaccination Program, other than political or incompetent reasons?
Queen of Hearts, done. Will put up, one a day over the next few days. Several articles in the queue.
ReplyDeleteDo not be fooled by what the USA is pulling in Afghanistan. It is a case of fake withdrawal to quieten the opposing voices, then start an internal conflict in Afghanistan and then moving in with a bigger force using the reason of saving Afghanistan. They never said they are pulling out totally, instead keeping a small force of advisers in Afghanistan. What do they mean by that?
ReplyDeleteNot being able to start wars in other areas, like Ukraine vs Russia, Afghanistan seems a necessary move to keep the Military Establishment's weapons sales program going.
The American killers are all still there, called contractors. In reality, mercenaries, paid to kill.
ReplyDelete