Meanwhile, AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine, which was developed with the University of Oxford, continues to face safety doubts.
The jab has been suspended in several European countries over reports of rare blood clots.
A top official in the European Medicines Agency on Sunday suggested that it might be worth abandoning AstraZeneca's coronavirus vaccine for all age groups where alternatives are available.
But the EMA said the body's head of vaccine strategy, Marco Cavaleri, had been misrepresented, and that he believed its benefits outweigh its risks.
"The decision on its use in different populations and ages is the prerogative of the EU Member States, based on specific factors such as virus circulation and vaccine availability," a spokeswoman said.
However, a study from British health authorities showed on Monday that two doses of AstraZeneca-Oxford or rival Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines stopped the need for in-patient treatment in more than 90 per cent of cases of the Delta variant....CNA
The above report showed that AstraZeneca vaccine is unsafe in general and should not be approved for use. That is why several European countries have banned its used. Outside Europe and the USA, the users are countries that are desperate for vaccines, cannot get hold of other vaccines or refused to use Chinese vaccines and willing to risk the lives of their people in using AstraZeneca. Some countries donated this vaccines that they no longer want to use on their citizens to other desperado countries that do not mind the risk involved.
Can you imagine what the West would say if it is made in
China? Dangerous, unfit for use, must be banned immediately, it causes
more harm than good etc etc. The different and biased standard of the
West is very apparent here. Now which silly country is still using this
vaccine?
Take note of the last paragraph that said 'two doses of AstraZeneca-Oxford or rival Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines stopped the need for in-patient treatment in more than 90 per cent of cases of the Delta variant....'
The way these reports about efficacy of vaccines must be read carefully. The 90% is about no need for in-patient treatment, or no need for hospitalisation. The efficacy to prevent infection is definitely very much lower than this. Efficacy data could mean from infection, mild symptoms, need for hospitalisation/serious cases, and death. Do not be duped by such numbers as they mean different things.
"The EMA said the body's head of vaccine strategy, Marco Cavaleri, had been misrepresented, and that he believed its benefits outweigh its risks."
ReplyDeleteBenefits =
1) AZ stands to benefit from profitable business,
2)bribes of $millions given by AZ to EMA Chief.
Risks = suffering and deaths of the masses, do not affect him and his family.
Therefore, of course, naturally benefits outweigh the risks, of course.
See the pun in his statement?
Whenever people say "Benefits outweigh the Risks", there is a double-meaning. So, don't be an idiot to buy into such political statements.
To the victims of the negative effects and results of the Vaccines, the Risks outweigh the benefits. In fact, there is no benefit whatsoever to the victims of the the bad vaccines.
ReplyDeleteThe statement "Its benefits outweigh its risks" can also be applied to all the banned drugs, from the perspective of drug dealers and drug addicts, and even from the interpretation of the police and law enforcement personnel who are on the take.
ReplyDeleteDo you want to know why the Prince of Vaccines of India, the owner of the plant that produces AstraZeneca, had to flee to hide in Britain for his own safety? It was reported that there were death threats against him because of the vaccine.
ReplyDeleteWhat was the real story behind this?
24 clinics selected to administer Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine; S$10 to S$25 for single dose
ReplyDeletehttps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/covid-19-24-clinics-selected-administer-sinovac-vaccine-moh-15027526
Why the disparity again and again? $10 to $25. Why? Profiteering by some clinics?
DeleteFrom:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.news-medical.net/amp/news/20210315/Research-looks-at-inflammatory-nature-of-lipid-nanoparticle-component-in-mRNA-vaccines.aspx
“While the vital role of LNPs in these vaccines’ action is established, the potentially inflammatory nature of these LNPs is not assessed. Also, in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines’ human trials, it is reported that side effects often linked to inflammation, such as pain, swelling, fever, and sleepiness, are common.
Because the vaccine was presumed to be non-inflammatory, these side-effects were taken to be generated from the potent immune response to the vaccine. Therefore, there is a need for a systemic approach to analyze the inflammatory properties of LNPs and understand their role in the vaccination process.
Notably, intranasal inoculation with the same dose (10 μg) of LNP (as in the intradermal delivery) caused a high mortality rate in mice – about 80% of the treated mice died in less than 24 hours. The researchers found that the LNPs’ inflammatory properties are not site-specific. They observed a fast diffusion, dispersion, and distribution rate in the tissues, upon internal delivery.”
It is good to know the mRNA vaccine LNPs delivery pathway & its potential inflammatory nature which is not assessed!
For now how can I make an informed choice to be jab with mRNA vaccine given the reported inflammatory response which caused a high mortality rate in animal studies!
I am not an anti-vaxxer!
We have been told all this while that the side effects are caused by our body's immune system reacting to the vaccines.
ReplyDeleteIn reality, the side effects are caused by the vaccines themselves, not our immune system.
From:
ReplyDeletehttps://immunology.sciencemag.org/content/6/60/eabj3684
The inclusion of infants in the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine roll-out is important to prevent severe complications of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infections and to limit transmission and could possibly be implemented via the global pediatric vaccine schedule. However, age-dependent differences in immune function require careful evaluation of novel vaccines in the pediatric population.
Toward this goal, we assessed the safety and immunogenicity of two SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Two groups of 8 infant rhesus macaques (RMs) were immunized intramuscularly at weeks 0 and 4 with stabilized prefusion SARS-CoV-2 S-2P spike (S) protein encoded by mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (mRNA-LNP) or the purified S protein mixed with 3M-052, a synthetic TLR7/8 agonist in a squalene emulsion (Protein+3M-052-SE).
Neither vaccine induced adverse effects. Both vaccines elicited high magnitude IgG binding to RBD, N terminus domain, S1, and S2, ACE2 blocking activity, and high neutralizing antibody titers, all peaking at week 6. S-specific memory B cells were detected by week 4 and S-specific T cell responses were dominated by the production of IL-17, IFN-γ, or TNF-α. Antibody and cellular responses were stable through week 22. The immune responses for the mRNA-LNP vaccine were of a similar magnitude to those elicited by the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine in adults.
The S-2P mRNA-LNP and Protein-3M-052-SE vaccines were well-tolerated and highly immunogenic in infant RMs, providing proof-of concept for a pediatric SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with the potential for durable immunity that might decrease the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and mitigate the ongoing health and socioeconomic impacts of COVID-19.
I don't trust this kind of reports because you won't know what goes on behind closed doors.
DeleteBig Pharmas have big money and deep pockets. With big money and deep pockets, plus their primary aim of making more big money, they can afford to buy over the big scientists to say things for mutual interests and mutual benefits. A win-win situation all the time. In addition, the big Pharmas can also buy over big media's and big reporters and big editors to do their biddings at any time, at any place, at any price.
Ordinary people, who are unaware or uninterested to find out more, are easily convinced and think that the Big Pharmas are telling them the whole truth, nothing but the truth.
The fact that these Big Pharmas absolved themselves of any responsibility for any eventuality or mishap that may or will happen after taking their vaccines, is already a clear tell-tail sign that they should not be trusted.
Correction: "tell-tail sign" should read as "tell-tale sign".
ReplyDeleteIndia's latest Covid data shows that it has remarkable success with reducing infection, not by using AstraZeneca but cow dung and cow's urine. These are natural organic cure.
ReplyDeleteTremendous demand for Chinese Sinovac Covid-19 vaccine in Singapore
ReplyDeleteSome centres getting 'non-stop' inquiries - ST June 17
Some clinics have been receiving "non-stop" inquiries from people interested in taking Sinovac's Covid-19 vaccine following the Ministry of Health's (MOH) announcement late on Wednesday (June 16) that 24 private healthcare institutions were licensed to administer it.
MOH said that anyone interested in taking the vaccine could contact the 24 selected providers directly from Friday for more details.
But, as at Thursday afternoon, it appeared some of the providers were inundated by calls.
The Straits Times contacted all 24 providers but 20 either did not answer the phone or could not be reached.
The four that did respond said they had been dealing with calls about the Sinovac vaccine since morning.
WATCH: Israeli Children Erupt In Celebration When Told They Can Remove Masks
ReplyDeletehttps://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-israeli-children-erupt-in-celebration-when-told-they-can-remove-masks
RB,
ReplyDeleteFrom 12:15an onwards are posted by one sneaky Anti-China spy working very hard to smear the China Vaccines.
Better delete all those fake news.
Most of them have been posted before, and you have deleted them.
Don't allow him to use your blog to spread his collection of Anti-China fake news and lies.
Done. This IB's intention is very clear. will delete whenever it appears.
ReplyDeleteIf you read the surge in cases in UK due to Delta variant, you will know that all the vaccines, mRNAs or Chinese, are having trouble treating it. This is a very infectious and probably very deadly variants.
ReplyDeleteOnly fools and idiots would allow this variant into the country. See the spread in the Bukit Merah and Telok Blangah Drive clusters and you will know what we are dealing with. And these are people who have been vaccinated with mRNAs.
The West will not report on the efficacy of their vaccines against the Delta variant. The media is silent on this. Even with the surge in UK, they are not comment why their vaccines are not effective against it.
ReplyDelete