This NASA is supposed to be a stitched panorama view from several pics, unless it is just one frame.
The above 2 pics are by China's probe Tianwen1. The top pic is taken from quite a distance from the surface of Mars and still not able to see the curvature of Mars, because Mars is too big, many times bigger than the moon. The lower pic is a closer view. Notice the texture of Mars' surface...does not look anything like on earth, especially the whitish elongated stuff.
The NASA pics look very earth like, like the surface of earth in some corners.
Now look at earlier pics of Mars from other Nasa rovers. Below are two parts of a panorama view of Mars. Notice the horizon was not curved.
Looks like a shot from the movie 'Total Recall' starring Arnold Schwarzenegger.
ReplyDeleteIf it looks real in Hollywood decades ago, what is the point of wasting the shot instead of putting it to good use. Never mind, just believe for now!
Well, whether the horizon is curved or not, it does not matter. Who has ever been there after all to point out the hoax. Has anyone seen God? Oh yes, I think George W. Bush did and he even claimed he talked to God. And Trump claimed he is God himself.
ReplyDeleteA picture is worth a thousand words.
ReplyDeleteMillions of dollars spent just to produce two pictures of Mars to show to the world?
There must be hundreds, if not thousands, of pictures taken.
Why only show two pictures?
Logically, after Donald Trump, Grandmaster liar, NASA pictures maybe fake. Luckily, China will be giving earthlings an Audit report soon.
ReplyDeleteReal or not I'm waiting for China Mars lander expected in May to land. Further china expected to sent 22 astronauts to their space station by 2023. I hope to see it ... Hoping JC
ReplyDeleteThe pictures are real. As real as they want to make it. But where they are taken, is it real? Maybe in the studios of Hollywood?
ReplyDeleteThey cannot allow China Mars lander to be there first and take the limelight. They must be there first, by hook or by crook.
ReplyDeleteVery hard to tell lah.
ReplyDeleteMight probably need a third party to testify it's not hoaxsters, how bout sending Sinkies space probe to verify them? Why not ? Sinkes got lots of FTs definitely got some talent, imagine talents from all over the world came , definitely r Smart enough for Mars mission.
Btw, people say or believe that the moon landing in Apollo series is a fake one. Now, they say Mar landing as well. Wonder who to listen to the tales.
ReplyDeleteSinkie leaders not interested in moon or mars landings lah.
ReplyDeleteSinkie leaders only interested in sinking. Not landing.
That's why they go all out to import fake degree, fake Masters, fake PhD, fake IT experts, fake Bankers, fake Doctors, fake Professors, fake Teachers, fake Engineers, fake Lawyers, fake Consultants, etc. to sink Sinkieland.
China's Tianwen1 was launched a week earlier than the American's probe and reached Mars's orbit ahead of the Americans. But the Americans landed on Mars first, claiming to adopt the riskier method of bashing directly through the Mars atmosphere, risking being burnt out.
ReplyDeleteChina's method is to flow with the orbit and descended on Mars on a more gradual path, lower the danger of heat burnt.
So the Americans claimed they have landed, this time ahead of China, like they did in the 60s landing of the moon, ahead of the Russians.
They must win. Believe it or not, time will tell.
It has been talked about that the two bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were really a nuclear bomb test to gauge the damage and to show the world that the USA is ahead of the USSR in nuclear weapons. To cover this up they later claimed that this was to end the war to prevent further loss of lives.
ReplyDeleteThe 'disputed' moon landing was also to show the world that the USA was ahead of the USSR in going to the moon. Perhaps knowing they will lose the moon race, so by hook or by crook, they probably pulled off the biggest hoax in history in the studios of Hollywood.
They did lost the 'First Man in Space' trophy to the USSR. Was it because they did not have the means to pull it off? Or perhaps they thought of doing another Hollywood stunt but were shy of doing one too many and be discovered?
One thing still puzzles me. Why didn't the USA have their own space station and need to play second fiddle to the Russians? Since they are claiming to be so advanced in space technology, with NASA's big name, putting a space station for themselves up there would reap tremendous benefits and prestige. Why did they not do so? Now that the Russian Space Station is being decommissioned, what is next for them?
Nobody ever tested the A bomb on humans and populated areas. So they tested theirs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and saw the potential. The rest if history.
ReplyDelete