"Two weeks after the alleged chlorine and
sarin attack, and amid warnings Syria's regime may have attempted to
tamper with evidence, what clues might the team be looking for?
CHEMICAL TRACES
Despite the long delay, inspectors of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) could still be able to find chemical traces useful for the probe, experts have told AFP."
Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/world/what-clues-might-chemical-experts-in-syria-be-looking-for--10162178
CHEMICAL TRACES
Despite the long delay, inspectors of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) could still be able to find chemical traces useful for the probe, experts have told AFP."
Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/world/what-clues-might-chemical-experts-in-syria-be-looking-for--10162178
After the West put on a media blitzkrig to accuse Assad for poisoning his people in Douma, the UN immediately sent a OPCW team to visit the site to conduct an on site investigation of the crime. Before the team could land in Syria, the West in their duplicity, conducted a massive air strike at Douma and two other sites alleged to be manufacturing chemical weapons. In so doing the team could not get to the site earlier. Now, two weeks have gone pass and the team finally arrived in Douma.
As usual, the western propaganda machine started cranking, that it was Assad that caused the delay in the investigation. They ignored the fact that if the evil West did not conduct the air strikes, the team would be in Douma with a couple of days.
Now, after two weeks, the whole intent and purpose of the airstrike was to delay the OPCW team to reach the site, the West is putting the blame squarely on Assad. And they are asking what could the OPCW team find after such a long time lapse? The intent is that the less they found the better. The more blur the evidence the better.
The West would not want the OPCW team to find 'Made in USA' or 'Made in UK'' or Made in You Know Who country in the traces of chemical gas left, if any. And the accusation and allegation against Assad would hold since the OPCW team could not find the 'Made in USA or UK' marks on anything on site.
See how devious is the scheme of these evil men and women in hurriedly conducting an airstrike without approval from the UN? To destroy all evidence of their finger prints in the chemicals and gas used against the Syrians. Now they put on a blank face of honesty and righteousness and point the finger at Assad for delaying the OPCW team to reach the site and unable to prove anything.
The West are experts and regular producers of fake news and false flag incidents.
On the contrary to what you asked, after two weeks - these two weeks give the Evil and Crooked Minded USA to send in airstrikes to deliver chemical bombs onto Douma, Syria as well as CIA agents to make it look like it was the Syrian National Forces that did it.
ReplyDeleteThe whole idea is to implicate Assad.
Whatever team sends by the UN must be suspect. The UN is not entirely independent.
Firstly, it is located in USA, therefore at the mercy and coercion of the US Government.
Secondly, it is infiltrated by countless UN Agents - from all the 11 to 15 US Intelligence Organizations.
Thirdly, it is, until Trump threatened to withdraw financial supported, it has been heavily funded by the USA and Japan.
Forthly, the Working Groups' Executives that the UN Secretary-General and his HQ Staff depended upon to do the leg-works and dirty works are mainly pro- US people or US people.
Fifthly, the Consultants whom the UN Secretary-General seeks advice on specialized areas are mainly on US payroll through the CIA, the Human Rights Group and the Humanitarian Aid Group.
Morning Ginger,
ReplyDeleteAgree with your comments. Yes, the bombing could be the planting of chemicals on the sites in Douma for the OPCW to pick up as evidence of chemical attacks by Assad.
Rb, Knn what a smart move. Knn that is all I can say.
ReplyDeleteThe war in Iraq went through the UN. And on fabricated evidence the UN members became the coalition of the willing. And Saddam Hussein became history.
ReplyDeleteHow can the UN be neutral when it is highly dependent on the contributions of the US? Same thing as electing the US presidents, whose campaign money comes from the big conglomerates, controlled by the big banks, which in turn is controlled by the dark side. Everyone knows that. Step out of line and they will be assassinated!
The UN was set up by the West, to rubber-stamp whatever they West dictate. And with that they can control the whole world, since most countries are encouraged to be members, led by the nose. Same thing as the IMF, World Bank and rating agencies.