7/20/2016

The truth about the South China Sea issue



The truth about the South China Sea Issue

First let those politicians, strategic studies research personals , the mass medias, the TVs and Radio talks in some ASEAN countries and those who are beholden to USA somehow or other beware of what they are talking

when they keep on parroting USA version and stunts on the South China Sea issue less they be accused of complicity with USA in deceiving the world that the PCA is part of the United Nation which it is not and the

United Nation official spokesman had already reiterated publicly  that the PCA tribunal is a private organisation and United Nation has nothing to do with it. UN spokesman, Stephane Dujarric  spokesman for United

Nations Secretary General Ban Ki Moon said, "The UN doesn't have a position on the legal and procedural merits of the South China Sea arbitration case."

Professional maritime experts worldwide pointed out that the use of terms such as "United Nation Tribunal" or "United Nation backed Tribunal is incorrect as they confuse 'PCA' with the "United Nations "ICJ"  (

International Court of Justice ) This private tribunal acts as an agent of external powers The arbitration case is a political farce enshrouded in a legal cloak. It is important that people in ASEAN countries especially the mass

media and TV take note of this.

The case was contrived with evil intent and initiated at the behest of USA to suit its agenda. Acquino, being beholden to USA acted for his own personal interest and USA is not acting for the interest of the Philippines either

but to suit its agenda of seizing it as an excuse to meddle in the region's affairs. While the absurb proceedings were going on USA accompanied it with military threats of destroyers, aircraft carriers, strategic bombers,

reconnaisance planes and many other vile tricks to show an outright demonstration and manifestation of "might is right". This outward show of modern gun boat policy of the Opium Wars of the 1830s to 1860s no longer

frightens China for China will make sure all the American ships will be welcomed to the deep ocean floor.

The Philippines was ill advised by a powerhouse of Anglo American legal team
appointed by Abe's appointed Japanese judge . The fake private tribunal manipulated the ruling and tries to deny China's historic claims in the South China Sea and wipe out its rights to resources there. The lawyers in the

sham tribunal redefined the standard meaning of arbitration which for centuries had been defined as a procedure in which two parties agree to a third party to settle their disputes. Now it seems to Philippine lawyers

arbitration can be a unilateral arbitration. The bogus tribunal issued the final award on 12th July,2016 amid a global chorus that the panel has no jurisdiction and its decision is naturally null and void . The award sweepingly

sided with the claims unilaterally filed by Aquino 111, which in the eyes of observers , is a mockery of justice.

China from the outset ruled that the private arbitration set up is illicit and illegal and has no jurisdiction. The bogus tribunal failure to recognise that is a matter of professional incompetence and deliberate disregard is a matter

of questional integrity.China attribute territorial sovereignty over maritime feature in the South China Sea is beyond the 1982 United Nation  Convention on the Law of the Sea ( UNCLOS ). In fact China abide Article 298

of UNCLOS which excludes compulsory arbitration on maritime boundaries. The international law of 1982 cannot redraw the border or reinvent new right.

Further since decades ago and after the Second World War  Japan had through various treaties like the Cairo Conference, Potsdam Treaty and San Francisco Treaty officially returned the Paracel and the Spratly island

archipelagos to China. In 1958, Vietnam under the then Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Van Dong officially  acknowledged and confirmed China's sovereignty over the Paracel and Spratly islands with Chinese Premier

Zhou En Lai.

In fact in 1947 the KMT Republic of China had 291 islands , reefs and banks mapped and qualified as part of the "Nine Dash Line" . In1949 The Peoples Republic of China  inherited the claim made by KMT . In 1958

China declared its territorial waters within the "Nine Dash Line encompassing the Paracels and the Spratly islands and it was officially acknowledged and  endorsed by Vietnam as already aforementioned. It is a historical

fact that China has continuous sovereignty over the South China Sea islands , the Paracels and Spratlys since the 4th Century BC to the Tang, Ming and Ching dynasties and right up to the present time.
Trouble surface when in the mid 1970s Vietnam, Philippines and Malaysia stealthily and illegally grab many of the Chinese islands. Vietnam stole 21 islands, Philippines 7 and Malaysia 5. This was followed by recent silly

accusations on China's land reclamation. China was the last country to do so as Vietnam and Philippines had carried out reclamation earlier, and China does so only on the islands and reefs under China's control rather than

trying to take back the islands and reefs illegally occupied by others.

Tensions began to rise in the South China Sea when USA pivot to Asia in 2010. America then deliberately instigate and provoke trouble and intensify disputes strained relations and weakened confidence. However, China

believe that negotiation and consultation among parties concerned is the most feasible and effective way to solve the issue. China's ambassador to USA, Mr Cui Tiankai reiterated that "diplomatic efforts should not and will

not be blocked by a 'scrap of paper or by a fleet of aircraft carriers."

The American hyping on Freedom of passage and Navigation is hogwash. Freedom of passage and navigation was not an issue in the past, is not an issue now and will never be an issue in the future. But America is twisting

and abusing freedom of passage and navigation by constantly sending warships close to Chinese coastline to threaten and intimidate China. This hostile American behaviour must stop. How will America feel and react if

Russia and China constantly sail warships close to America's coastline?

Southernglory1
Wednesday,20th July, 2016

14 comments:

  1. How will America feel and react if Russia and China constantly sail warships close to America's coastline?
    Southernglory1

    Russia and China will never sail warships close to America's coastline so the issue of how America feel does not not arise.

    The Sinkie opposition will never be ready to be govt so the issue of PAP being voted out as govt does not arise.

    So please don't worry over issues that will never arise.

    ReplyDelete
  2. By ruling that the Taiping Island or Itu Aba s a rock and not an island the fake tribunal has completely nullify all the verdicts against China. Nobody should believe any of its verdicts

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is the Pinoy occupied Thitu an island or a rock . Pinoys say it is an island and not a rock, Yet Chinese held Taiping Island which is many times bigger than Thitu and has permanent Chinese settlements there since time immemorial is deemed as a rock. The silly ridiculous anomalous verdict defies common sense and belief and expose the real evil intent of the bogus tribunal. Only the greedy Pinoys and their evil American masters believe China is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The private PCA tribunal is a political ploy against China,. The cohort of its American judges handpicked by Abe's Japanese chief judge have prejudged China's historical sovereign rights and so its verdict is lunlawful, null and void. The Pinoys and the Americans are making a fool of themselves if they think they can fool and con the world.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The bogus tribunal verdict invalidated Chinese sovereignty over the Nine Dash Line which has been established in 1947 and acknowledged by the world , by the Americans, Japanese, Viets and Pinoys in the past prior to the mid 1970s and it should not be supplanted by the 1982 UNCLOS. When China Signed up to the UNCLOS in 1986 and ratified the convention in 1996, it retained the U-shaped Nine Dash Line to indicate China's historical sovereign rights. The unlawful tribunal is set up to undermine China's rights and sovereignty.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The evil intent of American sponsored Philippine plan of the bogus tribunal verdict will only increase tension . And that fits in the American design of provoking choas and distability in East Asia to suit its design to hold control and hegemony in the region. China must be on full time alert and be ready to rout the Americans should they start hostilities.

    ReplyDelete

  7. "China from the outset ruled that the private arbitration set up is illicit and illegal and has no jurisdiction ", unquote.

    WHY DID THE UNITED NATION NOT PREVENT OR BAN THE PRIVATE ARBITRATORS FROM USING THE
    ORGANIZATION(UN)S' NAME ???
    OR
    WHY UNITED NATION ALLOWS THE PRIVATE ARBITRATORS TO USE ITS' NAME AND OR PRETENDS TO BE PART OF UNITED NATION.

    CAN UNITED NATION ISSUE A DECLARATION THAT THE PRIVATE ARBITRATOR HAD ABUSED OR MISUSED THE UNITED NATION.

    MAYBE THE UNITED NATION SHOULD EVEN TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE PRIVATE ARBITRATORS.
    NO REASON WHY THE UNITED NATION
    CANNOT TELL THE WORLD THE TRUTH.


    patriot



    ReplyDelete
  8. RB. Good piece of article. True, the verdict is a joke.

    ReplyDelete
  9. These are the comments from the UN on the Permanent Court of Arbitration.


    ‘The United Nations said on Wednesday it has nothing to do with the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which set up a tribunal that handled the South China Sea arbitration case the Philippines filed unilaterally in 2013.

    The PCA never claim to be a part of the UN. Only the believers are claiming that it is backed by the UN.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hard to say if really war. There's probability some PLA or its pilots might defect as link shown.

    http://bbs.tianya.cn/post-333-9592-1.shtml



    ReplyDelete
  11. 台游览车事故 24辽宁游客遇难 来自低价旅行团

    台湾当地的地接旅行社不少是福建人过去开的 ???? ,“为了适应大陆,压价格,操作模式有点像过去的香港购物团,也是开店、进店”。
    来源;搜狐要闻

    ReplyDelete
  12. Red bean, real arbitration can fail if one party did not agree to it.

    Under the " kangaroo trial" sets up by USA ,SCS arbitration cant fail even if China boycott it.

    Under the normal rule, Judge would declare that arbitration had collapse (fail).

    The only legal means available to the aggrieved party - Taking the case to the Court.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "The only legal means available to the aggrieved party-Taking the case tothe Court".

    Lol...
    That's what the Philippines did. It's ignored by China and the World
    at large.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Lol...
    That's what the Philippines did. It's ignored by China and the World
    at large.
    _______________________________________________________________________________
    Philippine take their case to the ad hoc arbitration, not a court.

    ReplyDelete