China’s
strategic plan to take over world leadership from the Americans is based on a
two prong strategy in the economic and military fronts. Militarily, China does
not need to over take the Americans in military hardware. There is no need for
China to have seven fleets of naval armada to police the seven seas. This is
obsolete in the 21st Century and in theChinese strategy. Only an
anachronistic Empire still thinks of ruling the seven seas.
With a
policy of non intervention in the domestic affairs of foreign countries,
without the need to conduct regime change, and without the ambition of
occupying foreign land and setting up foreign military bases, all archaic
concepts of an imperial empire, China does not have to spend extravagantly on its
armed forces. China only needs to maintain a sufficient force to keep the
Americans from their wildness, to stop them from thinking that it is possible
to fight a war with China and win. A
strong enough deterrent force to check the Americans from becoming reckless and
trigger happy would be more than enough to maintain peace between the two super
powers. China could thus spend modestly on defence while allowing the Americans
to continue to indulge in their extravagant ways in military spending. The Americans
will spend itself to poverty if unchecked.
With the
military front covered and maintained at status quo, China will move rapidly in
the economic front to invest all over the world and gain influence and
leadership in economic development and commerce, in infrastructure development,
in financial assistance, anything but the use of military force. This is an
area that the Americans would not be able to compete with China’s cheap labour
and cheap cost of production and cheap finance with no political strings
attached. China has been making big strides in South America, Europe, Africa
and Central Asia. Its next big target will be South and Southeast Asia. When
these two regions accept Chinese investments and infrastructure development,
China’s economic conquest of the world will be more or less complete. By then
the Americans would be left alone as a solitary military power but unable to do
anything with its military might. It will be a new prosperous world under
Chinese leadership in economic development, in peace.
Of course in
the process the Americans would try their best to incite and provoke wars,
regional wars, to upset and derail the Chinese plan for world leadership. How
many countries would be sucked into the American military pipe dream of empire
building, to start wars and to fight wars, when they have all to gain in peace
and to grow and prosper and elevate the quality of life for their people? Who
would want wars when they can have peace and prosperity?
China has
already seized the initiative in economic cooperation and development with the
rest of the world without asserting any military or political pressure on
countries that it is investing and helping to rebuild. The economic benefits to
these countries are tangible and immediate. Compare what China is doing in
Central Asia, Africa, South America and what the Americans are doing in the
Middle East, in agitating and provoking tensions in East Asia and the South
China Sea. China is moving in with money
and expertise for economic and infrastructure development. The Americans are
moving in with all their military hardware and weapons of war, to set up
military bases and to start wars.
The
strategies of both the Chinese and the Americans for world supremacy are in
stark contrast and not difficult to see except for those that chose not to see.
Who shall eventually triumph and win this war for influence over the world? The
Americans would be left with crazy allies that are trigger happy and think war
is fun and glorious. China would be gaining fans in countries that it invested
and brought economic growth and prosperity to their people in peace.
The battle
has begun in a long protracted war in all corners of the world, without the use
of guns and bullets. It may take several decades for the victor to stand on the
rostrum in a war without bloodshed and with winners everywhere. Should the
Americans win this war, it would be a brutal and devastating world war and
nothing much will be left standing and could also mark the end of civilization.
Some western
analysts are speculating that China would want to push the Americans out of the
western Pacific by force. This is too shallow a view to come from supposedly serious
thinking people. The cost of a military conflict with the Americans is
unimaginable. China would avoid an all out war with the Americans at all cost
unless forced into it. There is nothing to be gained by the Chinese except to
bear huge losses of lives and the destruction of their country and with no
certainty of winning. China would seek to win this war peacefully, by economic
means.
At some
point in time the rest of the world would have to choose between peaceful
economic development and progress led by China or continuous tension, armed
conflicts and destruction led by the Americans.
Even with its second aircraft carrier expected to come on-stream in 2016 China should not, must not be baited or tempted into a naval conflicts with US/Japan/Australia/Vietnam/PH/India alliance in the making. siao-leow now US 3rd fleet command now seem on-standby /ready to assist 7th fleet to fight should it goes crash bang boom in the unPacific ocean !
ReplyDeleteLast time that Manchurian dowager went to declare war on 11 western power. 3 countries backed up leaving China fighting 8 western powers. It was a huge mistake. However if Qing dynasty was strong and efficient and led by a wiser leader then maybe there would be no revolution then and it would be still the Manchurians people controlling China.
ReplyDeleteTerritorial waters or a territorial sea as defined by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,[1] is a belt of coastal waters extending at most 12 nautical miles (22.2 km; 13.8 mi) from the baseline of a coastal state.
ReplyDeleteThe territorial sea is regarded as the sovereign territory of the state, although foreign ships (both military and civilian) are allowed innocent passage through it; this sovereignty also extends to the airspace over and seabed below. -- wiki
Why are the Indonesians not claiming the seas next to Australia under the UNCLOS?
ReplyDeleteBecause the UNCLOS is a new law. Australia already claimed by the British as their country.
Why the islanders in the Indian Ocean not claiming Diego Garcia under the UNCLOS? Because the Americans claimed the islands before UNCLOS.
Actually its usa that serve that on a platter to china. usa screwed themselves by being slaves to debt.
ReplyDeleteHi The S, Welcome to the blog.
ReplyDelete