Then I read
the media and found out that little bird was wrong. It was the other way. Does it
mean that AHPETC does not have good intention and the lapses were not lapses?
Or is it fair to throw wild allegations that maybe some money was lost? I said
I trust all politicians and political parties. In this case I trust that the WP
has not been dishonest and they have good intention to serve the people of
Aljunied and Hougang. If they have been dishonesty or if they have committed
any wrongs, I dare tell you they would have long been charged in court and be
behind bars.
So I dare
say that they are honest people and there is no dishonesty, maybe some lapses
in the procedures due to being new to the job. And this is going to happen to
any new party winning an election and would have to start anew to learn how to
run town councils. Is this not a big flaw in the system, when such essential
services are subject to lapses but with good intention after every GE? I think
the idea of having MPs running town councils is very unsound. Tiok or not? As
for the intention you judge yourself.
And to make
matter worse, when a new town council takes over, all the surplus funds must be
transferred to the reserves, which means they have to start with an empty cash
box. So how to transfer to the Sinking Fund should there be a slight shortfall
while other existing town councils could fall back on their accumulated
surpluses to do so?
Is this one
of the reasons why AHPETC is caught having problems transferring funds to the
Sinking Fund? And to make things more difficult, their entitled govt grants
also kena tangkat. How to transfer?
Fair or not?
Depends on how one qualify good intentions. Some people qualify good as good and some qualify good as bad. Recent events says it all. You decide.
ReplyDeleteOur PAP Millionaires are becoming more and more incredible.
ReplyDeleteAIM, Conflict of interests, Toxic bond investments & write-off, Businesses to members, etc.....Can all be found in PAPPIES GRCs and SMCs.
ReplyDeleteGood intention, no dishonesty.
ReplyDeleteArrrrrrgggghhhhhh.
ReplyDeleteI CANT HELP THINKING THAT
BELIEVING IN HONESTY
IS
LIKE CHEATING ONESELF
In Singapore everyone is honest. Not sure about the foreigners whose culture is anything but honesty.
ReplyDeleteHonest until proven dishonestly dishonest. I wonder how long those Government agencies were at fault before the AGO told us so. People in glass houses should not throw stones.
ReplyDeleteAmen!
Mr. Red Bean
ReplyDeleteIsn't it about time for you to step up and come into this election....perhaps with WP.
You definitely have my vote.
Do something for the people, rather than blog about it.....come in to the lime light.
Haha. I don't think any party would want me : )
ReplyDeleteIts obvious there is a coverup, because if you don't have a receipt, the vendor will keep copies wit dates, and if a check is used the bank will have records. It is so easy to followup IF the government wished to. Moreover, $56k for 3 offsite trips? Use your brain, its waaaaaaay to much. But then maybe I am used to humbler travel arrangements:-(
ReplyDelete