APEC 2024 Peru. Biden shafted to a corner in the back row. Xi in front row next to Peru's President
5/14/2015
Amos Yee’s cartoon – A survey
‘The judge pointed out that the defence itself had acknowledged that such an image could encourage young people towards sexual experimentation.’ I quoted this from the ST.
I am thinking of conducting a survey on how the cartoon has actually affected the young and lead them to ‘sexual experimentation’. I heard more than a million people have viewed Amos video and if half are the young, it means half a million young people would have been exposed to this temptation.
I can expect some young and old reading Kamasutra or Kamasutra the movie would be tempted to indulge in some sexual experimentation by the vivid pictorial acts in the book/movie. How many would really be excited by the Amos Yee cartoon to really want to have a go at it? Was it really that sexually powderful?
Anyone got any idea? Anyone has actually done it after viewing the video, please kee chiu. I would like to take down the numbers to see how temptuous is that cartoon and how suggestive it has been to the young. Would be interesting to know, and the PR and advertising folks would learn something from it to work out their next project.
PS. I am very sure there are people who have not seen anything so ‘explicit’ before in their closet livestyle and would have gone bonkers and sexually berserk. And there will be people who would say ‘you mean that is suggestive’ Yawn?
Nowadays anyone, young or old can get access to explicit sexual pictures and videos. In an environment like this, decision making is key. You decide what you want to view and if you decide to view are you going to be influence and follow such behaviour.
ReplyDeleteIf you are lack self control, then don't go to such sites. Just like if you do not want to hear propaganda of the MIW, you can don't read ST or Today. If you choose to read, then you better have good self control.
what can we say about political judgements in Singapore .A better n more intelligent line of reasoning would have been that the great LKY got the better of the Pommies by turning this bit of gravel into what it is now....the judge would have been etched into immortality and Amos would have got his PBM for such a clever cartoon. Like all things governmental, the walking dinosaurs still walk our space leaving their piles of turd behind.
ReplyDeleteMT and LKY as sex objects.
ReplyDeleteI'm going to throw up.
I think my libido just died.
No more sex for the next 2 weeks.
This is 2015, and we are still talking about young people being influenced by just those images to indulge in sexual experimentation? How daft can some people be?
ReplyDeleteI think they should ban the internet, the use of computers and smartphones because these are avenues for access to sites that have a bad infleence on the young.
It appears that some highly learned people are still living in the dark ages dispensing what they call 'power logic'
The monks and nuns would be covering their mouths at such cartoons and letting out ooohhs and aaahhhs in a highly sexcited way. People who are deprived and never seen such things would go crazy I tell you.
ReplyDeleteOur children are at extremely high risk. Believe me.
Uncle Matilah will tell 45 years ago no computer for him and he doesn't need watch such picture to get aroused.
ReplyDeleteNaturally start khee chio at 15 years old lah.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGee... after watching the video and mock-up picture, got excitement meh?
ReplyDeleteI think I got 'more excited' by what the judge's statement.
Laughing,
Kaffein
Of course these righteous people never watch this types of explicit "pictures". This make me wonder how where to "enter" and produce babies themselves.
ReplyDeleteWhoa bro, you be surprised these righteous hypocrites engaged in ropes, leathers, whips etc
DeleteWant school girls uniforms, Ai Mei Mei costumes. I seen haellejush God children looking for x rated films
P.S.
ReplyDeleteBTW, who was the fucking mindless fool who reasoned that being "turned on sexually" by images should be a crime?
For fuck's sake lah. That's just nonsense.
Haha
ReplyDeleteThis is even more influencial than the cartoon. Need to ban it.
The post by Matilah is many times more X than Amos the kid's cartoon. Now wait for him to appear before the judge. This one will get more than 3 weeks for sure.
ReplyDeleteThis thread is now X rated. Kids are banned from this thread. Parents please do not allowed your kids or anyone below 21 to read this thread.
ReplyDeleteRedbean.
Please, you flatter me too much.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I have SOLID constitutional rights where I am. I pay lots of taxes and that ensures that the state has the resources to defend my, as well as all persons in Australia, constitutional rights to freedom from govt control where speech and communication are concerned.
Want to challenge High Court of Australia? Be my guest. Make sure you got plenty money....and time ;-)
I am waiting for that guy to stalk you and do the necessary, a quick slap and run and shout, sue me lah, sue me lah.
ReplyDeleteYou have insulted his hero. What you did is worst than what Amos did.
Please lah uncle. Stop. Such flattery is very embarrassing to me....
ReplyDeleteAnyway, if he wants to slap me, he'd better join the queue, ASAP, as it gets longer by the day 😂😂😂
See cartoon or sketch or not, every young people are going to experiment with sex one day sooner. This is natural instinct.
ReplyDeleteIf adults educated until become lawyers and judges are not aware of this fact, then this world must be full of monks and nuns living a life of celibacy, intentionally tuning their minds of all forms of sex and sexual discussions and sexual experimentations.
Even small puppies also know how to do the sketch that Amos did of LKY and MT. You can see them doing it on peoples' legs or on other puppies or animals.
I think if imagination is stretched too far, everything single item on earth can lead to sexual experimentations.
If you want to pin down a kid to accused him of anything and make it stick, you will go all out (even out of simple logic and reasoning) to pin him down.
If I want to stretch my imagination to accuse anybody, I can say anyone who bring their kids to the market is guilty of exposing their kids to objects that will lead to sexual experimentations, e.g. cucumbers, bananas, carrots, etc. Even donuts can lead to sexual experimentations, isn't it?
Come on, please lah. You adults use some common sense and please give Amos a break, lah. Have a life, man.
RB
ReplyDeleteIt will be interesting if all the supporters (including maybe yourself?) here meet with Amos and support his bail eg his 1st bailor and lets see what happens next.
Sorry lah, where got time. Talk kopi tiam ok but to do all those things.
ReplyDeleteThis story is to help innoculate us from becoming like PAPigs over Amos Yee.
ReplyDeleteTwo Monks and a Woman - a Zen Lesson For PAPigs
================================
A senior monk and a junior monk were traveling together. At one point, they came to a river with a strong current. As the monks were preparing to cross the river, they saw a very young and beautiful woman also attempting to cross. The young woman asked if they could help her cross to the other side.
The two monks glanced at one another because they had taken vows not to touch a woman.
Then, without a word, the older monk picked up the woman, carried her across the river, placed her gently on the other side, and carried on his journey.
The younger monk couldn’t believe what had just happened. After rejoining his companion, he was speechless, and an hour passed without a word between them.
Two more hours passed, then three, finally the younger monk could contain himself any longer, and blurted out “As monks, we are not permitted a woman, how could you then carry that woman on your shoulders?”
The older monk looked at him and replied, “Brother, I set her down on the other side of the river, why are you still carrying her?”
This simple Zen story has a beautiful message about living in the present moment.
How often do we carry around past hurts, holding onto resentments when the only person we are really hurting is ourselves. -
So PAPigs.
The Present moment is more important than the past.
Give us back our CPF money.
And let go of your grandfather's story about one unverified Singaporean man spending all his CPF money in Batam.
What about one unverified woman investing our CPF money on company shares that keep going bankrupt?
SOURCE:
-----------
See more at: http://www.kindspring.org/story/view.php?sid=63753#sthash.qdSBQlNF.dpuf
Either you break free from the jackass things your parents have done to you … or you deserve what you get.
ReplyDeleteGE 2015.
Vote wisely
Who bothers how ridiculous the judgement sounds as long as its a reason to convict
ReplyDeleteto satisfy the hordes of sycophants baying for Amos' blood.
Now we understand why the Jury System was done away.
the defence itself had acknowledged that such an image could encourage young people towards sexual experimentation.’
ReplyDeleteSomeone said pay peanuts get monks.
Pro bono and you get dud, well...
Amos Yee's caricature (the line drawing super-imposed with the pictures of the face of LKY and MT) is a subjective matter. All subjective matter cannot be judged objectively, not even by the wisest person in the world.
ReplyDeleteIn my humble opinion, the Court has erred in two aspects:
1. No empirical evidence was collected to prove the assumption that the caricature would influence other young ones to do sexual experimentation.
2. Such subjective matter as referring to sex cannot and must not be left to the judgment of a single Judge. There should be a Jury or at least three Judges or more.
Moreover, a conservative woman and a more open-minded man would have different perceptions and interpretations of the same subject.
Today is 2015, the Internet Age, the Cyberspace Age, the Information Age. We are not living in the Victorian Age or Ancient India or Imperial China any more. Our thinking must progress, not go backwards.
A wider space and better tolerance and patience must follow with better education and more affluent life styles.
That is the only way forward. We cannot ask for less.
If all the judges are either monks or nuns, it would not make any difference right?
ReplyDeleteNow we have two famous sex models to emulate and show the way. Real or not?
Even judges themselves have a different opinion on many judgements.
ReplyDeleteOtherwise, why are some judgements from lower courts overturned upon appeal to a higher court? Because the judges have a different take on the issue.
So, justice is subjective and judges can be very wrong. You can get away with murder if you are rich or powerful is not an idle boast.
The image will put you off sex for ever.
ReplyDeleteYou mean the new sex god and goddess?
ReplyDeleteI think the judge is outdated, old school and obsolete. Please let the young people to judge themselves. Lets have a referendum.
ReplyDeleteHow can singapore going to progress to the next century if we are still holding on to such medieval thinking and cannot adapt to new thinking? I think the judicial system need to revolve according to time/age/era. Adaptability is key.
ReplyDeleteThe judge has a wonderful power of imagination.
ReplyDelete