11/27/2013

Australia said it is ‘unhelpful’

The Australians got the cheek to tell China that its Air Defence Identification Zone is unhelpful? An ADIZ is a nation’s defensive line to guard against an intrusion by air. Why didn’t the Australians tell the Japanese that their ADIZ is unhelpful?
 

And it is helpful to tap on the private phones of the President of a neighbouring country and his close associates? This is definitely not unhelpful ya. It is bad, it is offensive, and it is downright immoral act. The Indonesians should not let this pretender to continue acting high and mighty. They should punish the Australians nice and proper for such obnoxious act against their President and who else.
 

Is this tapping act helpful, Julie Bishop?

61 comments:

  1. http://www.tremeritus.com/2013/11/26/prof-koh-continued-to-voice-his-support-for-minimum-wage/

    ASK ME:
    November 26, 2013 at 6:46 pm (Quote)
    A Finnish Lady Told me in Finland Ministers and ordinary folks the pay between them is very very small.People serves in govt because they love the country not money

    Rating: +43 (from 43 votes)

    ReplyDelete
  2. fuck those assholes and their running dogs


    is the communication centre along xxxxx still around??


    knnccb .... karma is a bitch

    ReplyDelete
  3. It only matters what they do, how they are able to do it, and what actually happened, and not what they say.

    Applies regardless of whether Australians, Japanese, Yankees, PAP or even Sinkie opposition.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "It only matters what they do, how they are able to do it, and what actually happened, and not what they say."
    Anon 10:01 am

    And those bloggers and netizens say only what and never do, tio bo? So doesn't matter lah?

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is also downright unhelpful for the Yanks to send two B52 bombers, albeit not armed as claimed, to test China's new Air Defence Zone.

    The Chinese should just scramble their latest fighters and shoot the damn Yankee planes out of the sky.

    OK. Defcon 1, so what?

    Fuck all, let's annihilate each other.

    All the overpaid charlatans of the world have the most to lose.

    ReplyDelete
  6. China should simply warn the Americans that any unidentified aircraft will be intercepted and accident might happen, like a missile being fired. The chances of such an accident will be higher than in the case of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade.

    Or a drone may crash with aircraft without flight plans and no transponder.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Actually the Aust-Indon spy thing is coming to a resolution. Like I said: it's thru the back channels.

    The NSA and CIA, plus other "secret" alphabet agencies of WASP (White Anglo Saxon Protestant) cuntrees have NO CHOICE but to spy on Islamic cuntrees like Indonesia and Malaysia. Everybody is aware that there are radical Islamic groups within those cuntrees "hiding" amongst the population of mostly "moderate" Muslims. No ones whether the governments of those Islamic cuntrees are compromised, and if they are how deep does it go? Could there be Muslim govt officials who sympathise with Islamic terrorists? No one knows, yet the prospect is PLAUSIBLE.

    Terrorist threats (in the region) which have been thwarted in the past and their members traced back to Indonesia and Malaysia -- the governments being ineffective in dealing with the problem. Those terror attacks which were not thwarted resulted in horrible death and destruction.

    Supposing there was NO spying going on, and then a terrorist attack, say in Singapore. Then you have a situation of people screaming for answers asking WHY the government has failed in gathering intel? By gathering intel, they might have been able to stop the attack -- again, this is a "maybe", but the government has got to put in EFFORT to protect the cuntree and its citizens from being blown up by Jihadist assholes.

    So the question is not whether to spy or not, but to what extent does the spying go?

    >> The Australians got the cheek to tell China that its Air Defence Identification Zone is unhelpful?

    One thing you can rest assured: Australia is full of cheeky people, who will tell you to your face if they are "dissatisfied" with something.

    In this case, Australia is behaving like a proxy of the USA.

    ReplyDelete
  8. As for the B52s, it is an aggressive act of defiance. China should make an announcement that military aircraft encroaching within a 200nm radious of China's territorial airspace is considered a hostile intrusion if they did not notify China and can be shot down like they used to shoot down the U2s overflying China on spy mission.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What a sicko. Nippon airlines and all commercial airlines are recognising the ADIZ and submitting their flight plans.

    You crazy or what?

    ReplyDelete
  10. RB, congrats. When Veritas steps in, this thread is going to hit 500 comments and your kopi will go up for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This boy probably didn't know what is a U2. Not born yet.

    ReplyDelete
  12. @November 27, 2013 10:35 am


    great ... you have privy informations?

    else ... look for a stone

    knnccb .... alice in wonderland

    ReplyDelete
  13. redbean:

    >> China should simply warn the Americans that any unidentified aircraft will be intercepted and accident might happen

    Not so easy lah. China has to play cool because everyone in the region is waiting for China to fuck up.

    Flying 2 B52s into China's newly-claimed territory is definitely a provocative step. The most potent response, IMO, is to be coy. Just tell the US, please respect our territory; don't do that again. No anger. No emotion.

    Then if the US does it again, dump a few hundred billion in US Treasuries -- sink their dollar, cause a spike in US interest rates, and fuck up Christmas for them ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Matilah is right. Kudos to him.

    Where is the Kim Guy from?

    Seems like he is a fantastic historian, military expert/scientist/strategist and all in one.
    Sin has such calibre and why is he/she not interested to talk about local affairs.
    Those highbrow stuff he/she talk about matters little to Sinkies.
    Squabbling over issues with little to do with Sinkies and littering the space here is irking many readers leh.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The USSR and USA military jet fly into one anothers ADIZ without giving each other a damn.

    No big deal if USA and Japan fighter hoover around and keep quiet.

    But every civilian aircraft identify themselves and this time, JAL and ANA will not be any exception. Imagine if China keep harassing civilian flight with intercepters.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The insect got fucked by so many people that he had to close down his blog and gone into hiding. Now he found a new father and adopted his new father's surname of Kim.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Thanks everyone for keeping this blog active and for topping up my kopi kau.

    I will sit by and drink my kopi and enjoy the discussion : )

    ReplyDelete

  18. When did China shoot down a U2 in a spy mission over its territory??


    Don waste time.

    ReplyDelete
  19. It was not shot down.

    It was brought down undamaged.

    That was superiority in high technology.

    ReplyDelete
  20. 'We were fortunate that we were able to develop our missile artillery, and that we could use the surface-to-air missile to bring down the U-2.

    Five U-2s were shot down with Russian-developed SA-2 surface-to-air missiles of an early generation, with limited range. This made the Chinese achievement quite remarkable. To hit the U-2 at its altitude, the missile practically had to be launched from almost directly underneath its flight path. How did you manage that?

    It was just like guerrilla warfare. Our missile launchers were fixed on military trucks and could be moved around. We had some sense of where the priority targets of interest to the U-2s were, and that’s where we located our launchers. We generally fired at the U-2 when it was within a range of 15 kilometers [49,212 feet], and we used certain tactics to bring the U-2 into that range. For example, when a U-2 was detected in an area where a missile launcher was located, we cut off all the radars in that area so the U-2 would not be alerted to their presence. The U-2 was not very maneuverable. When it started getting within range, we would suddenly turn on the radars, and it was too late for the U-2 to react.'

    Go google.

    ReplyDelete
  21. 'to prevent misinformation, the U-2 came again, was shot down. then again. and again. then uncle sam got smart and stopped sending them.'

    ReplyDelete
  22. When China starts selling, the rest will panic and rush to sell.

    ReplyDelete
  23. @1151:

    Exactly right. Interest rates in USA ==> double digits. US Fed has to print more and more USD to buy up (buy back) their OWN DEBT. US dollar collapses. Blood in the streets. US Treasury price continues to fall...

    ReplyDelete
  24. Brilliant!!!! No need to fire a bullet.

    ReplyDelete
  25. what is US trying to convey its act ? waht how lian show muscle B52
    this one nuclear bomber sortie is very aggressive move -its implied threat - possible annihilation of coastal Chinese cities .
    Australia so far away 8800KM away also wants to cow peh machiam like a deputy sheriff of Asia
    bo li yu one !!

    ReplyDelete
  26. australia and Spore are bee kok spies, reportedly spying its regional neighbours
    spore govt still never open mouth regarding the China ADzone. but can guess liao Spore always call for code of conduct echoing bee kok right??

    ReplyDelete
  27. Spore will say it will not recognise the ADIZ.

    ReplyDelete
  28. they chose sent the bomber52 to challenege the zone, of all planes. they said they don't hiew chinese declaration. if you don't bochap why then you need to say it is not armed?
    further more how can the Chinese assume it is not armed in this situation, what if is armed ? Amerians playing with words and mind games, maybe China needs to summons Zhugeliang ?
    Chinese just love mind games, lets watch?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Zhugeliang is more than capable of reading the minds of Hagel and Kerry. They wants the staus quo.
    5-eye powers to call the shots in Asia.

    ReplyDelete
  30. RB, there are trolls in your comment trying to distract, lie and provide wrong information.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Hi Veritas, this is bound to be. Just reply to those that are clear in their heads. Think you already know that. : )

    Just ignore the silly ones.

    ReplyDelete
  32. The Chinese do not just implement an ADIZ and let it as that. They are strategists and are planning many years a head.

    Pull out your armchairs and watch how the Chinamen play Go with cowboys. This is a LP and will not be over in a day or two.

    ReplyDelete
  33. aiyah all this fighting fighting with tracts of facts and figures. i long for the days of agongkia, patriot, oldhorse, gintai, and those anonymouses who stop by once in a while to give gentlemanly comments.

    - sentimentol fool

    ReplyDelete
  34. As one of the Imperial puppets, the Aussies have to bark when it's imperial master said so. At least an echo is an acknowledgement that it hears it's master's voice and is very obedient.

    ReplyDelete
  35. There are only two sides in this world. One does not have to be a genius to figure out which side the australia is on. At least they are honest about it and is way better than pretend and then betray.

    ReplyDelete
  36. The Three musketeers(三个臭皮匠)
    will be very enlightening as they seem
    to be the most learned ones around.
    Must congratulate Redbean for
    attracting them here.
    A good blogger deserves great followers.

    ReplyDelete
  37. What Abbott has said simply parrots the US line. His govt is unable to think for itself. Very regretful. Like Indo's foreign minister said, "the embrassment should be on Australia (not Indo)".

    ReplyDelete
  38. Now jepun kia now says mulling woh to EXPAND its air defence zone in the pacific . As usual, the western media would NOT view Japan move as assertive. We know that Japan move must be approved by US so naturally american media would give its approval too.
    All the US allies start to voice up like Australia,Ger,SK,Taiwan, waiting for UK, SG to say something lah

    ReplyDelete
  39. m Singaporean sleeping in the Streets:https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=homeless+in+singapore&client=firefox-a&hs=01G&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=caeVUpbVEoGIrQezsIGgDg&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=960&bih=630

    http://www.tremeritus.com/2013/11/26/prof-koh-continued-to-voice-his-support-for-minimum-wage/

    http://mysingaporenews.blogspot.sg/2009/04/top-30-highest-paid-politicians-in.html

    ReplyDelete
  40. Japan Airlines and other Japanese Airlines have just announced that they will not comply with the Chinese Requirements. Japanese Government is not happy with their compliance.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Uh oh, RB, here we go again. Will the record 337 comments be beaten, and RB get record kopi o?

    ReplyDelete
  42. RB, at the rate this "moron" is ranting on, you will surely get your kopi o, unless his purse is as empty as the hot air coming from his arsehole. Goodnight, and enjoy his soliloquy.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Uh oh, the sicko is here. Everyone clap, clap, clap. Just don't reply to him and let him rant to himself.

    RB's kopi and hits going to shoot sky high.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Eh gila, go and fuck off lah.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Abang Beruang is a bitter man. He's been supporting the Muslim cause for a long time. He even attacked some Pappy Malay stooge for being anti-tudong. Abang Beruang implied that the stooge used the word 'Terrorpore' when he did not. In the end, the anti-tudong Pappy Malay stooges ganged up on him and probably complained about him to the Pappy top dog. Now they've made it so difficult for readers to enter Abang Beruang's blog that nobody goes there. Abang Beruang is a lonely, bitter man without an audience. And he feels betrayed too. He's never used the word 'f**k' before and now he freely uses it. He's become like the people he used to criticize. Sad. I bet he even misses PinkRox & friends (actually one person, most likely to be Matilah). Be careful RB, Abang Beruang, in my opinion, is slowly turning into a virtual suicide bomber and might just blow himself up here.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Hi ..

    It would be a sheer fetish saliver-dripping soap opera to let the the AV Women vs Comfort Women have a show down ...
    Go bare ..n who cares ...
    Yum Seng ....

    Bye ..btw m i at the right channel ????

    ReplyDelete
  47. 9.40 pm is none other than PinkRox or Matilah, etc. Huhuhuhuhuh!

    ReplyDelete
  48. Wa sai, matilah, veritas got so much to say everyday, why keep quiet to thomas kim, come on men, what happen to the hero's of this blog. Dun tell us that you2 are chicken. Knn

    Let make over 500.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Will the lock up of CPF causes many talent younger Singaporean or those who have lots of CPF to emigrate, left behind those poorer Singaporean not so talented, which need welfare as a result deteriorately situations?

    Could the CPF lock up scheme causes many well educated and talented Singaporean to emigrate to other countries causes serious brain drain?

    ReplyDelete
  50. Pinkrox, according to Bear, is a Oz qualified pychologist that stalks him(Bear).
    He cannot be buroh, right?

    ReplyDelete
  51. Silence is golden.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Good morning Dan Yong, welcome to the blog. The Aussies are a member of the Evil Empire. One day, if the Indonesians get their acts together and turn out to be another economic miracle like China, then it will have a tough neighbour to deal with.

    Asean at the moment is weak as several of its members are part of the Evil Empire too. If the Indonesians take full leadership of Asean and call the shot, the Evil Empire's room for manouvre would shrink, and so would the voice of the Australians.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Who is this Abang Beraung?

    ReplyDelete
  54. Abang Beruang is OCBC: Orang Cina Bukan Cina

    ReplyDelete
  55. 'Abang Beruang is OCBC: Orang Cina Bukan Cina '

    What kind of shit is that? Chap Cheng Kia?

    ReplyDelete
  56. Oh dear, RB there is a mad man talking to himself whole morning. This is really an IMH case.

    ReplyDelete
  57. the presence of the bomber is an escalation of situation
    why american jets love to fly near the chinese border when it is 十万八千里 from theirs
    how come US so 'peaceful' yet need to station so many troops 70,000 in japan & S korea ?

    ReplyDelete
  58. US is a country always at war and inciting wars. Getting countries to fight with each other and they will sell them arms to profit and to control them. The mess they created in the Middle East will keep the Arabs struggling to rebuild their country for the next 30 years. And before they recover, the US will start another war and the cycle repeats. Destroy and rebuild, forever struggling and poor.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Loony Bear it is.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Australia recognizes uk monarch as its head of state. a result of colonialism by this arrogant england that came digging for golds and suck its resources from nz to india, sg to canton, iran to afghansitan, want to talk about arrogance siao!

    The Anglo–Persian War lasted between November 1, 1856 and April 4, 1857, and was fought between the United Kingdom and Persia (which was at the time ruled by the Qajar dynasty).

    ReplyDelete
  61. As for Falkland island war which was fought by nritain as recently as in .. UK warship coming from the other side of the globe !!


    One two hundred yeats is short really short in China,Persia history compared to 5 eyes powers

    this a situation where there is a chinese saying 公说公有理,婆说婆有理

    ReplyDelete