9/09/2013

US military intervention in Syria could be catastrophic

by Bhim Singh
on 06 Sep 2013
"Profile: 'Bhim Singh is an Indian politician, activist, lawyer and author. "UN Secretary-General

Ban Ki-moon has acknowledged the concern expressed by many across the world on the dangers to peace in case the United States insists on military intervention in Syria. We in India also urge the UN Secretary-General to intervene to save peace as well as the letter and spirit of the Charter of the United Nations, which does not permit interference in the domestic affairs of any Member state.
 

Article 2 (7) is mandatory for all Members of the General Assembly and is equally applicable to the big powers and permanent members of the Security Council. It was tragic and unfortunate that the United States has been deliberately violating the mandate of the UN Charter - in erstwhile Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan and now in Syria. The living example of violation of the UN Charter was the US invasion of Iraq in 2003 when the Bush administration attacked under the false pretext that Iraq was manufacturing/hiding weapons of mass destruction.
 

This author personally interacted with the Chief Inspector deputed by the United Nations in Iraq in 2001, who admitted that his team was not able to trace any such weapons. It was proved beyond an iota of doubt that the US charge against President Saddam Hussein was false and unfounded and was made only to demonize the Arab leader and liquidate him. Washington succeeded in its game plan. The silence of the United Nations over the Anglo-American attack against Iraq has damaged the credibility of the UN; its silence was suicidal.
 

In 1999, the US used NATO to commit naked aggression against Yugoslavia with criminal intent to destroy Serbian culture, history and civilization. The NATO committed genocide of thousands of people and the international fraternity allowed wiping out the very name of Yugoslavia from the membership of the United Nations. President Slobodan Milosevic was abducted from his Belgrade residence, imprisoned in a dark cell manned by US commandoes in The Hague, Netherlands. He was ultimately found ‘murdered’ in his cell when the prosecutors failed to establish any guilt on his part….

More than two million people died of hunger and starvation caused by the illegal economic sanctions imposed by the United States of America against Iraq. In his book, ‘Iraq: A Heroic Resistance’, this author exposed the Anglo-American Bloc aggression against the people of Iraq followed by the genocide of innocent people. The US mission in Iraq was to capture oil, land and strategic waters in Iraq and the Arab world. Saddam Hussein was the biggest obstacle to this target and hence they started a worldwide media campaign to demonize him and succeeded in eliminating him (Saddam Hussein). The US proclaimed that it intended to bring democracy in Iraq. Today in Iraq hundreds of innocent people are killed daily by weapons manufactured in the western world. Where were the weapons of mass destruction that the US had detected in Iraq?
 

The United Nations is answerable for its silence when NATO fighters and bombers were showering bombs and arsenals on the people of Libya. International Law and the UN Charter were thrown to the winds by the Anglo-American Bloc and European allies. How and under what provision of the UN Charter did the Anglo-American Bloc use NATO forces to destroy the Arab people and brutally assassinate Libyan leader, Col. Gaddafi? The intention was not democracy but the oils of Libya which stands ninth in oil reserves in the world. Where is the democracy in Libya? Where were the humanists when the USA was committing genocide in Iraq, Libya and now in Syria?

The next target is India. The US has been promoting the Dixon Plan since 1951. To reach India, they are targetting Syria and Iran. Now American media is demonizing President Basher al-Assad, having succeeded in getting rid of Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak and also its first elected President, Mohamed Morsi.
Washington does not want to see another Nasser or Saddam or Gaddafi or even Arafat on Arab soil. Its entire strategy has been to demolish leadership in the Arab world and establish US hegemony. The interest is to grab Arab oils, earth-wealth and strategic land and waters all over the globe.

The Anglo-American Axis needs Gilgit-Baltistan to monitor China. This Bloc needs Afghanistan to keep watch on the Russian Federation. The US needs control over Latin America so that all the gold, diamond reserves and earth-wealth in those countries remains in its hands. The West has divided Sudan by fomenting Muslim-Christian conflict as done previously in the Indian sub-continent during British Rule. They divided Cameroon, the Congo, East Africa, and Palestine….

Now the Obama administration wants to attack Syria and liquidate President Basher al-Assad so that no dissenting voice remains against the United States. This fact is established after the clear message from NATO Political Chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen that the attack on Syria shall be ‘short, sharp & tailored’. This means the aim is to liquidate the Syrian leadership and its elected President.

The British Parliament has demonstrated a clever strategy to keep Arab opinion divided. Prime Minister David Cameron lost his motion by 13 votes in the House of Commons, thus showing that Britons have learnt from Iraq and Libya….

Putin has dubbed the so-called ‘chemical weapons’ theory in Syria as ‘utter nonsense’. China is equally concerned about US intrigues to demolish Syria so that Israel can freely expand in the Middle East. Obama may have compulsions to attack Syria but Obama stands defeated in his own arguments when he welcomes the support of Arab leaders on the one hand and calls for democracy in the Arab world on the other.
India made its stand clear on the eve of G20 Conclave being held in Kremlin, Russia, that she will not support foreign interference in the domestic affairs of Syria. The people of India stand for peace all over the world. India stands for the sovereignty and independence of all nations, and opposes any interference in the domestic affairs of other nations."

The above article stated clearly the intent and motivation of the Americans to attack Syria and its invasion of other Middle Eastern and African countries. The sad thing about such articles is that the Americans are setting the agenda and no one is questioning if the Americans are guilty in the first place. They just tried to defend the victim nations. Why don’t they question America’s role in the chemical attack and what if the Americans are the supplier of the chemical weapons or even a party to the chemical attack?
 

Many countries rightfully sang the tune that the guilty party conducting chemical attacks should be duly punished. Hsien Loong also took this stand and said the same thing which is morally right and in tune with international law. The UN should decide and if found guilty, the party should be punished by a military attack.
 

Now the tricky part. The Russians have evidence to prove that the chemical weapons came from Saudi Arabia. If it is proven that it was the work of Saudi Arabia, would all the countries that condemned this chemical attack also support a UN resolution to bomb Saudi Arabia? And if the investigation goes further and prove that the US is behind the chemical attack, would they also support an attack on the USA? Or would everyone turn the other way, case closed?
 

Why aren’t the interested parties be conducting an investigation to prove the guilt or innocence of the Americans? At the moment they could be the devil but standing on high pedestal like angels. They could be the guilty party but pointing the fingers at everyone. They cannot be presumed to be innocence as they are party to this conflict and with their hands in everything, including training of insurgents, agents and provocateurs on the ground and supplying the weapons and supplying chemical weapons cannot be ruled out even through a third party. The Americans have vested interest in the conflict and cannot be trusted as a neutral observer.

36 comments:

  1. Redbean,

    Sad isn't it? Many Sinkies love Obama - a liar and war criminal, comparing him with LHL. Not forgetting TJS a paid stool pigeon by the US State Department in 2012 the US President election.

    Where do you stand Redbean, do you trust TJS to represent you in Parliament or your President? Another question which is the lesser of the two evils LHL or Obama? I support neither!

    JC

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi JC, I try to avoid pointing the finger at local politicians and aspiring politicians. Sinkies are not daft. They can see what the politicians are doing and saying. Each will judge according to his own level of thinking.

    Yes Obama is one of the biggest liars. In fact all the American leaders are liars. The daft Asians and Africans are just incapable to seeing anything further than the tip of their noses.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A bully will always be a bully period!

    ML

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fucking hell, here we go again!

    Oh well, stock up on snacks and booze. Settle back in a comfortable chair and veg out on "the remake of the same-o same-o American action-thriller-comedy" on the 24 hour entertainment-news channels.

    Mr Putin, time for you to squeeze some balls. It's ironic that you might be the only fella capable of saving the Syrians and the American people from a psychopathic lawyer. Oh what? Putin is a lawyer too?

    Shit!

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Emperor has decided. Go forth and kill...the Syrians.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Want United Nations to punish
    United States?

    Rofl!!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. How sick it could be if the USA is behind the chemical attack and using it to attack Syria?

    Remember Iraq! Remember Saddam Hussein! Remember Gaddafi! Remember who ordered their execution!

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Failing to respond to this breach of this international norm would send a signal to rogue nations, authoritarian regimes and terrorist organizations, that they can develop and use weapons of mass destruction and not pay a consequence. And that's not the world that we want to live in," Obama told a separate news conference..

    Who is the world's number one rogue nation? Who can develop and use weapons of mass destruction? Who is making and warehousing chemical weapons?

    ReplyDelete
  9. The agenda of the US is like an open book. They want to control the whole world and what better way than a divide and rule strategy.

    To make their agenda work, they have resorted to using all ways and means to achieve their objective. Lying, fabrication, arm twisting, sabaotage, false flag operations, destablising regimes are all well known to everyone round the world.

    It needs the most evil to call others evil is not an idle quote.

    ReplyDelete
  10. But what could the US gain by attacking Syria?

    Assad is not a Saddam or Osama, and Syria has no or not much oil.

    Maybe one less enemy for Israel?

    ReplyDelete
  11. But why is there a civil war in Syria in the first place?

    Where did all these rebels against Assad came from?

    And why these young rebels want to fight against Assad and die instead of earning a living and making money like we Sinkies?

    So for Obama to solve the problem, he must first understand the root cause, which is why are there so many armed rebels willing to fight in Syria.


    ReplyDelete
  12. Ya lor, how come Syria got so many young and armed rebels?

    Why they want to fight and cause so much destruction?

    Why don't they join opposition parties to contest elections to defeat Assad? In fact, Assad became President because he won the past elections, tio bo?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Readbean,

    "Yes Obama is one of the biggest liars. In fact all the American leaders are liars. The daft Asians and Africans are just incapable to seeing anything further than the tip of their noses..."

    Really like to buy you a dinner.... (I'll email you when I'm in town)I can share my experienced with you.... :-)

    ReplyDelete

  14. Anonymous: September 09, 2013 12:24 pm; September 09, 2013 12:18 pm

    "But why is there a civil war in Syria in the first place?"

    But what could the US gain by attacking Syria?

    Watch this:

    http://rt.com/on-air/

    http://news.linktv.org/videos/mr-president-are-you-going-to-ignore-congress-over-syria

    ReplyDelete
  15. Who incite the rebels, trained the rebels, armed the rebels, organised and brought in all the fighters from all over?

    You really do not know who is behind all the troubles and armed conflicts around the world?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Maybe the rebels in Syria, even those who are smart, cannot earn a living or make money, so they fight lor.

    If President Assad were able to make at least 60% of Syrians happy and satisfied, perhaps there will be no fighting and destruction at all. Instead, there will be prosperity and GDP growth. And USA will also become a friend of Syria.


    ReplyDelete
  17. Who is actually behind all this? Well, the Arab League, particularly the Saudis, are openly saying they are willing to foot the bill for the military operation. That surely tells you something about their motives.

    Syria does not have much oil, no doubt about that, but Syria is in the way of plans by Qatar to build a natural gas pipeline across the country to facilitate the flow of gas to Europe. The Saudis meanwhile are betting on plans to install a puppet government in Syria to cement their control of the flow of energy to Euripe via Syria. Ruasia is a staunch supporter of Syria and vice versa, and Russia stands to lose much if Syria goes down and the pipeline project is successful. That is why Putin is so worked up over the US plans to strike Syria.

    In the meantime, continue to listen to the US manufacturing lies, fabrications and propaganda to drum up support for their war mongering, just like the lies they cooked up in the Iraq war. The trouble is, despite their lying with a straight face, many poodles still think they are doing the right thing by attacking Syria.

    ReplyDelete
  18. When someone is blessed with a lot (such as oil or high pay or profits), have to learn to do more 'charity'. Just imagine they doing lots of charities, no one will want them to go away. Unfortunately, they always go and enrich themselves in ways that some people think they are crazy such as building fake gardens, buying posh cars, buying big mansions etc. I support taking the wealth from those rich AND selfish bastards and distribute to people who are in need. However, I do not support initiating a war for that.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 'Obama is one of the biggest liars. '


    RB, Obama is not the only liar here. He may not even be the biggest liar here. Everyone involved from behind is a far bigger liar.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The Arab League got no choice in this matter. US has got its hands on their balls. Whatever US wants, the Arab League must support. If not the heads of govt in the Arab League will end up like Saddam, Ghadaffi, Morsi, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Syria is the second last boy who is defiant against Big Daddy USA. USA attacking Syria is a sure thing, whether Senate or Congress or UN says no. After Syria will be the last defiant boy which is Iran. That is the job for the next US President to do. Kerry has been showing his masters that he wants the job of POTUS so badly he's willing to do their bidding.

    ReplyDelete
  22. With the rest of the world not supporting the US this time, it looks like the Americans are making a retreat oredy.

    Also Putin must have taken a very tough stand and prepare to confront the US and this may make the Americans to think twice. Without much support and a Russian President that was screwed by the betrayal in Iraq and Libya, he is going to make his stand this time or Russia will be history.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Obama and Putin should have a one to one fight so no need to drag other people children to die in some useless fighting.

    ReplyDelete
  24. b of 10:23pm,

    these big shots they rise to the top by getting others to do the dirty job while their hands are clean, bacteria free and smelling nice. notice almost no children of congressmen and senate are serving in iraq or afghanistan.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Redbean,

    One has to be careful what express here or anywhere. NSA (National Security Agency) archives everything transmitted in Internet including secure website and mail servers. They will use it on us, sharing it with the regime, regardless who you are or what you believe. In the fifties it was the commie, I stayed away everything and anything to do with the commie. Now the terrorists...

    I beg everyone to watch (download), share it with everyone the videos below. I love Carley Darley when she says "This man is a war criminal." To think many oppositions (TRE) Sinkies “love” Obama, many even beg Obama to be our PM. Not forgetting our Tan Jee Say (which you choose to remain silence, it's OK with me) a tool in place for the US incursion into Sinkieland in the future.

    JC

    http://cdn.youtubeavi.com/view-video/8SX58vqcEU0

    Tan Jee Say

    http://www.tremeritus.com/2012/11/07/the-world-comes-to-ohio/

    http://www.tremeritus.com/2013/08/10/tan-jee-say-celebrate-hope-welcome-change/

    ReplyDelete
  26. "With the rest of the world not supporting the US this time, it looks like the Americans are making a retreat oready..."

    Kerry gave Assad ONE week ultimate to get rid of the chemical weapon and Assad agrees. Now Kerry and Obama change the tune. Just in case reader dun knows who is John Kerry - was the champion against Vietnam war in the 60s, million’s Vietnamese and more than 60,000 American lives gone down the drain. (BTW, I was very lucky and been to Cholon (Chinatown) before the American screwed it up).

    After he married Heinz (tomato’s catchup fortune) widow's and voted in Democrat Senator from Massachusetts, he is even more NeoCon and a bigger liar than Gen Colin Powell Bush's Secretary of State. If anyone here believes the Democrats are the lesser of the two evils, think again.

    Many Sinkies associate the PAP with the Republican, to me the Democrats are even more evils than the Republican. The Republican will tell you what they will do and do it. The Democrats will tell you what they will NOT do, but do it after elected. Prove me wrong and I’ll eat my shoe in front of you while you enjoy a delious tender porterhouse steak with all the trimming.

    Now getting back to Sinkieland's Politics. Watch that Tan Jay See he is like the Democrat, an opportunist will do far more damage than the PAP. Dun forgets he was Deputy Director for Economic and Manpower Planning, Goh Chok Tong Principles Private Secretary, an ex-Morgan Grenfell director. The most damning statement he said "we should not promote manufacturing because it requires a lot of land and labour..."

    Sinkies think twice before you promote Tan Jee Say!

    JC

    ReplyDelete
  27. If Low Thia Khiang is not ready to be head of govt, how can Tan Jee Say be ready, you tell me lah.

    And do you think besides PAP, there is another party which can contest 100% of seats in GE 2016? Or earlier in 2015 if PAP so decides?

    And 60% Sinkies will only respect and vote for parties which can contest 100% of seats in a GE.

    Why? Because for sure such a party is ready to be govt.

    And doesn't matter good or bad govt, as long as they are ready is good enough already.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Whatever he is lah, but I think Tan Jee Say is fighting a losing battle against the PAP.

    And he lost more than Low Thia Khiang, so far that is.

    ReplyDelete
  29. But those bloggers who fight PAP on the internet won't lose anything lah. And it may be fun too.

    And provided they don't defame PAP lah.

    And some more can even get some kopi kau kau money.

    Smart fellas, indeed.

    ReplyDelete


  30. "I love Carley Darley when she says "This man is a war criminal."

    If you wanna real MP PLEASE, just clink on the link below and watch. This beautiful woman got GUT! She can stand to to anyone. We really need an MP like Carley Darley.

    http://cdn.youtubeavi.com/view-video/8SX58vqcEU0

    JC

    ReplyDelete
  31. Hi JC, no need to worry about the Americans. They also need feedback. We are giving them the feedback that they have not heard for a long time. That is why they became to bad.

    They defied every country, they defied the UN, they behaved like gangsters. They will be scalped one day by the brown Indians.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Readbean,

    Watch this

    http://www.hulu.com/watch/531035

    And tell me what you think of Charlie Rose and Al-Assad.

    JC

    JC

    ReplyDelete
  33. How come the issue of LTK and the WP not ready to govern always feature on most discussion on this blog on topics not related to them?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Something very familiar. Obama behave like PAP. Maybe he is secret admirer of LKY.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Hi JC, I viewed the Hulu video for 20 min and I gave up. Rose was there with a preconceived view that the Americans were right to accuse the Syrians for using chemical weapons. He has this fixed in his mind.

    Assad wasn't a good orator and speaking in a foreign tongue, he tried his best explaining his case quite reasonably. But Rose would not listen to anything he said. To Rose, Assad was guilty and he was there to prove it no matter what Assad said.

    That is how presumptious the Americans and Rose were. I got pissed by the way Rose conducted the interview.

    ReplyDelete
  36. In the Carley Darvey video, as usual, the Irish PM attacked her personally when unable to defend his position of siding with the American liars and their lies.

    This is the standard that many assholes will do, personal attack instead of talking about the issue at stake.

    ReplyDelete