The problem of highly qualified Singaporeans unable to find
employment is not only serious but politically unacceptable to a Govt that has
responsibility to its people first and foremost. Silly politicians that keep
harping blindly on meritocracy need to be voted out from Parliament.
Meritocracy and the practice of meritocracy as a country are very different and
complex from practising meritocracy in a well of frogs. In the well, the frogs
are safe from intruders and have only among themselves to see who is more
meritocratic. In the land of the blind the one eye frog shines.
Singapore
only has a population of 3.3m, citizens and PRs. An open door policy to invite
foreigners here to work, with only meritocracy as the criteria, is simply
insane, stupidity at its peak. There are 6 or 7 billion people out there and if
being more talented, or merits, is justification to work here, to replace
another Singaporean, the whole 3.3m people should be replaced, from the
President and PM and to the low down beggars on the street. Sure you can find
millions of people out there that are more meritocratic than a Singaporean or
the PM.
Just because the frogs in the well are protected from
competition, they can throw the meritocracy card at everyone, not good enough
get out, there is always a better foreigner to replace another Singaporean. Why
don’t the frogs allow fair competition and let the more meritocratic foreigners
to replace them? Never, they know too well that there will be many many out
there that will be better than them, every one of them.
In practice, many jobs can be done by a Singaporean. The
education and skill level of many Singaporeans are more than adequate to do the
job. You don’t need someone with 3 degrees or a master’s to be a middle
executive doing administrative work. You don’t need to drive a sports car to
get from point A to B when any good decent car will do. It is a fallacy to pick
the best when the best is ten times over qualified for the job that a
Singaporean is qualified to do? Does this sound complicated?
Who are we kidding, that Singaporeans are not good enough to
fill all the middle management positions with the qualifications they got from
our world class education system and universities? Who are we kidding when many
are employed instead of Singaporeans for all the wrong reasons except being
meritocratic?
The nonsense that is happening in the employment scene must
be made right and it is the duty and responsibility of the Govt to put it
right. It is the Gov’t’s thoughtless policy of opening the door widely to
foreigners with little due consideration to the employment needs of the
citizens that is the problem. Meritocracy without due recognition to country
and citizenship is simply crazy, madness, and idiocy. The whole population
should be moved out and replaced by more meritocratic people from all over the
world. Yah?
Hi RB, one need to think deeper. LKY is a fan of India society. He is a evangelist of hinduism. And meritocracy is a code word and to convert Singaporeans to Hindus.
ReplyDeleteWe need to ask why India is the most fucking miserable country in the world today. It is precisely the outcome of meritocracy, where everyone to each his own.
In India, the Brahmins are cleverest. They occupied all high post base on meritocracy. To the Dalits, you go to hell, so said the Brahmins.
And today, India has IQ of 81, among the lowest in the earth due to 3000 years of meritocracy, with Brahmins getting ever richer and parasitic.
We knew the Nordic society is the most harmonious in the whole world. Nordic are socialist. They do not practice jungle meritocracy. In the end, the whole society prosper. Everyone has high IQ. Nordic school system is the best in the world. The student are not stress yet they achieve very high academic ranking. Why?
Because of socialism. In Nordic society, everyone help one another. In the end, society advance.
The outcome of LKY meritocracy can only bring Singapore into shit. Eventually Singaporeans will become Indians where everybody is defending the right to rape and to shit on streets.
Yes we should open the political office for competition based on meritocracy
ReplyDelete"... open the political office for competition based on meritocracy."
ReplyDeleteWhat is a well qualified candidate for political office?
ANSWER
------
A person who has a;
strong passion for social welfare and justice.
strong desire to understand the root cause of a social problem.
strong determination to correct a social problem regardless of the difficulties.
These qualities would disqualify most PAPigs from political office.
What is NOT needed for political office?
ANSWER
--------
high academic achievements.
ivory tower helicopter view.
an already successful career in business, law, medicine, university.
12.33 ya right. U make your view known or not, to give a speech in hong ling park on may 1 unless u no balls talk only. But if u dare to talk, red truck may be there and you may get your balls crushed. So better check whether the two tiny still with you before u decide hor
ReplyDeleteMy balls is not the problem.
ReplyDeleteIt's how many PAP voters you can convert into Opposition voters before GE 2016.
PS:
I use my balls and dick to convert female PAP voters into Opposition voters.
They screw me.
I screw back.
There are so much wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony in this small little cumtree. I wonder how long it will last. Anyway, i think the OECD cumtrees are now ganging up to destroy top tax havens.
ReplyDeletei think the OECD cumtrees are now ganging up to destroy top tax havens
ReplyDeleteGood.
The sooner bankers are kick out from SG the better.
We need to live a honest life, to bring up our families using our labor and hard work.
To usury, launder blood monies, tax havening are very bad for karma. If we do not stop that, we are going to get retributions.
@954:
ReplyDelete>> Yes we should open the political office for competition based on meritocracy
Good luck with that. Read Machiavelli. Politics rewards the most crafty, charismatic and the best bullshitter.
@453:
>> OECD cumtrees are now ganging up to destroy top tax havens.
Wayang only lah.
I doubt they'll succeed. They try and try, but damn hard to do.
Especially with a place like Singapore who has NO FOREIGN DEBT, meaning the OECD and it's pals at the IMF, UN, World Bank etc. have no leverage when it comes to Singapore. The OECD doesn't even have the balls or the power to attack Delaware -- a well-known, well-used tax haven INSIDE the continental US of A.
The OECD has been around for 50 years. Tax havens are still going strong and money still flows there -- to avoid TAX!
Anyway, territorial tax havens are one thing. Already there are online tax havens -- distributed networks -- borderless and anonymous, and well-defended by a self-correcting, learning and self-improving systems. Good luck trying to shut that down ;-)