Obama’s inaugural speech ‘sheer rhetoric’ Written by LINH DINH
Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:47AM
U.S. President Barack Obama’s inaugural speech was a “sheer rhetoric,” which many Americans know that “the situation is much different,” an analyst said.
“In his inaugural speech, Obama
said a decade of war is now ending and that the U.S. will walk to resolve future
crises peacefully, but that is all rhetoric,” author and activist Linh Dinh told
Press TV’s U.S. Desk on Tuesday.
“Because Obama is starting new
wars, you know it is the attack on Libya and the hell that he is creating in
Syria is entirely instigated by the United States, and he’s now provoking
China.” he added. “The Prime Minister of Japan is visiting Washington DC next
month, and this man is quite literally a nutcase. He is a very dangerous man. He
denies that Japanese troops committed atrocities during World War II. He denies
there were comfort women, that is, sex slaves, Korean sex slaves, during World
War II, so he is the new Japanese prime minister, and he is an ally in the US
provocation of China, so that’s another crisis that the US is starting, and why
is the US doing that? It’s because the USS thrives in the war business. That’s
the only business it has left.”
After taking his second inaugural
oath of office in front of the Capitol building on Monday, Obama declared
misleadingly that “a decade of war is now ending,” while pledging to maintain
America’s superpower status through a global military presence.
“America will remain the anchor
of strong alliances in every corner of the globe; and we will renew those
institutions that extend our capacity to manage crisis abroad, for no one has a
greater stake in a peaceful world than its most powerful nation,” Obama said in
his speech.
It is not Obama. It is the ruling elites of US that are dangerous. They also controlled UK.
ReplyDelete"I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." A Einstein
The WW3 will be a nuclear war and most likely two thirds of human kind will be wiped out.
People of different nations have to work together, achieve an understand not to be manipulated by the ruling elites and refuse to go to war. Of cos, that is easier said than done.
A Nobel Peace Prize is a legitimate license to embark on a path of global domination; achieved militarily...in the name of PEACE.
ReplyDeleteGot Nobel Laureate? No? Too bad.
Us is always the biggest threat to world peace.in the eye of the usa, it's own selfish interest in the first place.talk of justice , freedom, democracy is bullshit
ReplyDeleteYou are right. Democracy IS bullshit.
ReplyDeleteMeritocracy OTOH, rocks like a motherfucker!
Any regime also has up and down sides. Any regime is good so long as it is in good hands. Any regime is bad so long as it is in bad hands. Even dictatorship can be a good one if the dictator is a benevolent leader.
ReplyDeleteNow the ruling elites for UK (cum US) want to get out of EU after making a big mess of EU and destroying the reputation via providing cheap loans and bankrupting a few states. Thats what they are good at. Killing people and states with cheap finance. Of cos, it takes two hands to clap but the odds are really against the people who borrowed cos they controlled the policy makers. The world (Russians, Chinese, Arabs, Europeans) should really put a joint effort to counter this power.
ReplyDelete