In the editorial page of the Straits Times today Andy Ho wrote an article on the legal arguments in Hague. He concluded, like all Singaporeans, that Singapore had a stronger case. With selective hearing and vested interests of course.
And this is bad. We owned the islands for more than 130 years and we only have a stronger case to retain it. We should be in a position to say there is no case. A stronger case can still lose and we stand to lose ownership of the islands.
I am getting jittery.
Erh, what else can he say? But it makes no difference to the people at the Hague.
ReplyDeleteI think is is not too helpful speculating on the outcome of the case. Both sides have presented their argument so lets wait for the verdict.
ReplyDelete