APEC 2024 Peru. Biden shafted to a corner in the back row. Xi in front row next to Peru's President
4/07/2007
The biggest bullshit
The biggest bullshit
Ho Kong Loon wrote, 'Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew spoke so plainly and precisely that dissenters to the proposed salary increase for ministers and top civil servants cannot but nod, albeit reluctantly, in assent at the sheer force, simplicity and veracity of his stand.'
I can agree that it was spoken plainly, simply, precisely and with sheer force. I can agree that civil servants should be paid well but nor exorbitantly. But for once I find the justification totally unacceptable. We are no longer paying peanuts at the top level. What is enough or not enough is relative.
Ho Kong Loon added that Singapore is what it is today...'only if the leadership is focussed, steely minded, possess extraordinary IQ and EQ, and is socially responsible and incorruptible. Good governance is a rare commodity.'
Again I agree but with a little exception. Can you use the word 'incorruptible' on anyone who tells you that he will become corrupt if you don't pay him his asking price? An incorruptible man is incorruptible no matter how much you pay him. He may have a stupid principle that tells him that he should not be corrupt. And he lives by it. This is the plain, simple and precise message. Is this the compelling reason why Ho Kong Loon is so convinced? To me, just this point alone is deeply troubling.
Only in Singapore can such an argument be used to justify one's own pay rise. Tell that to the American Congress or the British Parliament and see what the elected representatives of the people will have to say. Can anyone see what I am saying? Can anyone understand the underlying assumption of this kind of logic?
Do we need to pay so bloody well to attract the best and talented and incorruptible Singaporeans to come forward to serve the country and people? Or maybe I should rephrase this and ask why are all the good and able men shunning the political minefield?
Do we have a political system that encourages the best to step forward willingly for altruistic reasons or are we creating a system that is attracting people who are only interested in the money? If people step forward simply because there are a few millions on offer, what kind of men are they? Socially responsible and incorruptible?
If we are serious in getting more able people to step forward to serve. we need to re examine why they are not coming forward in the first place.
Singapore has many talents. Singapore's success speaks for itself. Singapore's success cannot be attributed to a handful of individuals alone. It goes all the way down. And at the top, people who are able to run the country as well as the current leadership, you can bet there are at least a few thousands of them with such ability, integrity and honesty out there.
Hi Redbean, I think you must have a very thick head. I see you are banging your head against a brick wall and I can bet you that you will not get anywhere. Whatever you say, however good your arguments are, however convincing your points may come across, you are not going to change anything. Sit back and watch the show.
ReplyDeleteTo paraphrase MM Lee: Get real, lah. Forget "altruism", unless of course you yourself want to practice it ;)
ReplyDeleteno lah, this is just one person talking nonsense here. who cares to read what we said. don't ever believe that we can convince anyone to change his mind.
ReplyDeletealways ask, 'who are we?' nobody is the answer.
to answer to matilah, i will practise altruism if i have a few millions in my bank account. or maybe not. maybe i will want to wait till i have a few billions before i feel generous to throw a little away.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely..
ReplyDelete