9 min on India's fake degree industry. India is the world's largest exporters of fake degree holders, millions of them. Luckily, very lucky for Singapore, none landed in Singapore...because none or very few were caught. And Singapore hired hundreds of thousands of Indian talents. This is a miracle in Singapore. Hundreds of thousands of Indian talents from the world's largest fake degree industry but all avoided Singapore. Is this a joke or what?
No need to check, to verify, or unable to verify, just trust them. Can do the job good enough. No degree, fake degree, never mind? I think only honest Indians choose to come to Singapore. Lucky Singapore.
And SIA proudly announced their plan to employ 500 pilots from Indian recently!
ReplyDeleteNot to worry, no fakes in Singapore. All under control.
ReplyDeleteYes you are Right Anon 10.34
DeleteHere, only Real Degrees and even those Singaporeans with double or triple diplomas and Degrees where they gets Poly Diplomas first and thence to Degrees whether local or overseas or correspondence are UNEMPLOYED
No eyes see
Singapore also no beggars. What we do not see, we do not have to admit. Everything is 'fine'. Even the beggars hide under stairs, but they are not beggars. Just like street musicians, tissue sellers and licensed beggars.
DeleteThese unemployed will still form part of the 65% in the next election. Because they are "mentally leashed" by the sinister brainwashing from the Mainstream Media they grow up in.
ReplyDelete镇龙大叔： ”This is a miracle in Singapore. ”
ReplyDeleteIf you are a "lame goose"（In Chinese it is called 拨脚鹅, in Hokkien "BaiKarGoa"), you will still be one anywhere you go including staying put in Sg.
Sunzi: "昔之善战者，**先为不可胜，以待敌之可胜**。不可胜在己，可胜在敌。”
Interpretation:
In order not to become a "lame goose" ("BaiKarGoa"), Sunzi advocated "anti-fragility". You are NOT DEFEATABLE NOT because of your competitor (or foreign competition) but because of your ability, your strength.
Anti-fragility means to become better, to emerge stronger out of (immense, even unfair) competition, (unbearable) stress, (senile type) chaos or (yen-carry trade unwind type of) volatility.
If you are anti-fragile, you can survive and do well independent of your locality.
If you are "BaiKarGoa" ("lame goose"), you will be a "looser" anywhere you go, even if you are teleported to a "paradise" or utopia.
When you become anti-fragile, even in a dystopia, you survive and thrive.
In Sg, (arguably) the "Mecca" of Capitalism (where millions make their "capitalist pilgrimage" to 取“新加坡资本主义”经 【优化的资本主义】），anti-fragility begets you a comfortable life. For the upper quarter percentile, they become.millionaires, multi-millionaires, centi-millionaires and even billionaires ...
The best thing is to sell off Singapore lock, stock and barrel and distribute the proceeds to every Singaporean. New citizens pro rata depending on how long they have become citizens. 0 for PRs.
ReplyDeleteThis will be better than giving away our wealth generated through generations, stupidly, slowly, bit by bit to foreigners, by 败家子.
The foreigners must be laughing themselves silly at the stupidity of Singapore. Come here and share the wealth of Singapore at the expense of Singaporeans. All like striking lottery when given a pink IC.
ReplyDeleteChinese Poem Title 【题目】：
ReplyDelete狮城资本主义麦加梦 - 只欠“东风”
Lion City: The Mecca of Modern Capitalism - Final Piece of the ZigZaw Puzzle 【Population】
狮城六月艳阳明，滨海金沙巨舰横。
巨眼摩轮如宿星，神机帷幄运奇兵。
倘使他年丁口旺，事了拂衣隐姓名。
Poem Author (作者）：Leo81 【Lion City】（狮子座81 【狮城】）
>>> https://mysingaporenews.blogspot.com/2026/06/when-singapore-refuses-to-see-elephants.html?m=1 <<<
ReplyDeleteRepost:
"Leo81June 13, 2026 8:38 pm
镇龙大叔 (aka Uncle Chua Chin Ling/ Redbean)：”Is it true that Singapore has no serious problems?”
镇龙大叔，你好！
你问： ”新加坡是不是没什么严重（或”大条”）的问题？”
说实话，还真有（而且很”大条”）！
Earlier this year in parliament, DPM GKY spoke about Sg facing an "existential problem" ...
TFR (2025) PLUMMETED to 0.87!
In 2013, our beloved founding PM LKY（国父李光耀）published his last book (One Man's View of the World). In the Singapore chapter, founding PM LKY lamented that our Singaporean core will be halved in one generation if our TFR remains unchanged (in 2013, Sg's TFR was about 1.21). At that time PM3 was in charge (and his "personal TFR" was 4.0) holding helm for almost 21 years in all (Aug 2004 - May 2024).
PM4 now in his 3rd year is facing an existential Sg threat of 0.87 TFR ... (NOT sure what is PM4's "personal TFR", anybody knows?) ...
Have you ever wonder assuming PM4 serves as long as PM3 at the top, by 2043, what would Sg's TFR be?
If this problem is NOT serious ("事情大条”），what is?
RB, you tell me lah!
Regards,"
>>> https://mysingaporenews.blogspot.com/2026/06/when-singapore-refuses-to-see-elephants.html?m=1 <<<
ReplyDeleteRepost - Part 1
"Leo81June 14, 2026 6:19 am
"Earlier this year in parliament, DPM GKY spoke about Sg facing an "existential problem" ...
TFR (2025) PLUMMETED to 0.87!
In 2013, our beloved founding PM LKY（国父李光耀）published his last book (One Man's View of the World). In the Singapore chapter, founding PM LKY lamented that our Singaporean core will be halved in one generation if our TFR remains unchanged (in 2013, Sg's TFR was about 1.21). At that time PM3 was in charge (and his "personal TFR" was 4.0) holding helm for almost 21 years in all (Aug 2004 - May 2024).
PM4 now in his 3rd year is facing an existential Sg threat of 0.87 TFR ... (NOT sure what is PM4's "personal TFR", anybody knows?) ...
Have you ever wonder assuming PM4 serves as long as PM3 at the top, by 2043, what would Sg's TFR be?
If this problem is NOT serious ("事情大条”），what is?"
Uncle RB: "Or is it a case of not seeing the elephants in the room?"
In terms of Sg's low TFR (0.87) in 2025, probably YES ... Policy makers likely missed out "the elephants in the room" when attempting to solve Sg's TFR problems ...
The solution may lie in two terms or phrases, one in Chinese and the other in English.
Let's start with the English term first which is "cognitive ambidexterity"
(as the cohort in RB's following are mostly "Jiak Cunt Tongue" [potato aka french fries lovers], ie, mostly 英哥lish speaking elites) .
The Chinese has a term with similar meaning "辨证思维” 。。。
The TFR issue is NOT unlike an extremely complex, highly integrated structural system of myriad nodes and intricate links that need to be optimised at the micro as well as macro level, forming a huge social supply chain tied up with external environment and with many components exhibiting enthropic characteristic which need to be managed not as a social tax but a fuel to engender healthy TFR.
In the Chinese term "辨证思维", the first variable that one must understand in order to tackle a problem is "the situation" ... what (actually) are you dealing with (NOT what you see or think you are dealing with which in Chinese its meaning is embodied in the opposite term aka ”形式思维”）。
Uncle RB: "...barking up the wrong
tree?"
Likely yes because if one tries to address Sg's low TFR issue using ”形式思维”, then history is the best judge with each passing year's TFR worst than the year before ...
If one is suffering from say high blood sugar and being treated with say high bp medication, obviously the outcome could be like Sg's TFR and end up "disastriously". Hence, when they missed the elephants in the room in terms of Sg's TFR problem and barked up the wrong tree, the end result is the 0.87 TFR (2025)?
To put it bluntly, how does a potential Sg young mother say working in the financial sector view parenthood?
1) A child is NOT a hedgable liability?
2) It is 100% illiquid?
3) It is (at least) a 20+ years voluntary penalty?
When a policy maker sees the TFR issue in the wrong light, she/ he is hoping the players make a wrong move and go into parenthood which highly rational and intelligent Sg females understanding the efficient economic and business environment they are in would choose NOT to play the game?
If someone identifies the problem wrongly, the remedies will be incorrect and the problem remained unresolved. Period.
Hence the phrase "cognitive ambidexterity" ... (Chinese equivalent "辨证思维")."
Repost - Part 2
ReplyDelete"Next, how to identify the solutions?
a) ASFR (32-39);
If one is a (senior) policy maker, likely she/ he has NEVER work in the PRIVATE SECTOR before? True? So they probably never work in any marketing position or how to achieve high revenue year in year out etc?
So what is the (possible) solution?
The hint(s) already given above. (Don't be "lazy", go figure out. Aren't you already paid humongously every month with fat bonuses every year?)
b) ASFR (15-25 and 40-49) likely near zero ...
c) 辨证思维 - 情况明， 方法对，决心大 - GO!
You use ”形式思维”, it is akin to what was incorrectly attributed to Einstein aka: "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.""