Now, something very sinister is happening in the USA with the shooting of Charlie Kirk. Few people really take note of what has come out of the woodwork. Republicans are warning USA citizens to mourn 'properly' or face consequences. How do they define what is mourning properly and not properly? Not crying loudly must obviously be fake mourning. Crying loudly must obviously be adopted to show real mourning. So, those that hate Charlie Kirk must therefore also be forced to cry out loudly or be singled out for punishment for not mourning properly, right?
When North Koreans mourned the death of its leader, the USA made fun of the mourning by saying that the people of North Korea were forced to show fake mourning by crying out loud. How do they know that? Now it appears that the USA is trying to force its citizens to follow North Korea and cry loudly in order to show real mourning as opposed to not crying out loud. Is that the new ideology copied from North Korea? Looks like another dictatorship rising and aping another, becoming the pot calling the kettle black. Kim Jong Un would be laughing his head off. Troop movements inside the USA are coming into focus and this could mean a dictatorship is brewing. Karma is working.
Before we admire the FBI for taking credit over the arrest of Kirk's shooter, it was actually a shame for the FBI for not actually able to arrest Robinson. He was turned in by his family on a platter. What kind of a dysfunctional family it must be, turning their own kind in to face death. And the whole family was supposed to support Trump.
Anonymous
There is a big coverup going on by the FBI and the whole establishment, the same modus operandi as in the John F. Kennedy assassination. There are so many inconsistencies and holes in the narrative being trotted out by the propaganda machine, presumably to muddy the waters to make the case against Tyler Robinson stick, the same way they did with scapegoat Lee Harvey Oswald, who was in turn assassinated by Jack Ruby, ostensibly to cover up the trail leading to the CIA and those at the very top. Many are now believing Robinson to be just the scapegoat.
ReplyDeleteNow about the assassination of Charlie Kirk, with Tyler Robinson first said to be turned in by his father, but credit still claimed by Kash Patel, the head of the FBI, patting his own head for a job well done.
The most ridiculous claim made was by the Governor about Tyler Robinson, wearing grey shorts and a maroon shirt seen on video entering the university, being able to sneak a huge rifle under his clothing, climbed onto the roof, changed into black T-shirt and black pants, did the shooting, jumped down from the roof hiding the rifle in his pants, with the rifle later found in the woods and getting arrested later wearing the same grey pants and maroon shirt. Now they even came out with the finding of a screwdriver on the roof, claiming it was used to assemble and disassemble the rifle to make it easier to hide under Robinson's clothing. Can anyone believe the wonderful story?
Tyler Robinson only fired one shot, and being a non-professional assassin, hit the target spot on at 200 yards. First time lucky? Then there was a spin that Charlie Kirk was wearing body armor and that the shot ricochet with the splinters hitting Kirk's neck killing him. Some believe there was a second shooter just standing close to Kirk. As more spin comes out to muddy the waters, who can we believe?
There are also attempts to tie the assassination to the fact that Charlie Kirk was turning his narratives against the Israelis, the other plausible reason for the assassination.
Another narrative talks about Robinson's gay mate and his or her influence on him, targeting the LGBTQ movement as the cause. Yet another showed E-mails purported to be from Middle Eastern persons with Middle Eastern names having issues with Charlie Kirk and his views for supporting Israel before, but not later as we were led to believe.
Would Tyler Robinson end up like Lee Oswald, assassinated by another mad man to cover up the trail leading to his paymaster? Nothing is clear and nothing is the truth coming out even from the FBI.
Kim Iversen has a very detailed viewpoint of the shaky evidence from the FBI and the authorities regarding the shooting on her Youtube site.
ReplyDelete