In a recent video, Trump was talking about an upcoming negotiation with Iranian representatives scheduled for Sunday 15th June in Oman. On Friday 13th June, Israel carried out its pre-emptive strike on Iran, that puts negotiations between USA and Iran out of the question. Now, days later, Trump was telling the world that Israel needed to strike Iran because the latter was not willing to negotiate. How he could lie through his dirty mouth by disregarding the facts is so absurd. Was the attack planned to sabotage the upcoming negotiation so that the USA/Iran war can be put to reality, using Israel as the fuse to ignite the flames? Any truce from the negotiation will probably not result in a conflict with Iran, which the USA and Israel had been looking forward to for decades.
Moreover, Trump's appointed Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, a Hindu by the way, had told the media earlier that Iran had not proceeded with uncovered plans to make a bomb. When asked about Tulsi Gabbard's information, Trump openly said that he 'does not care what she thinks'. In other words, Trump does not take the advice of even those he appointed into office, just acting at his own whims and fancies.
Now Israel is finding difficulty dealing with the Iranian retaliation and wants the USA to enter the war. It looks ominous that Russia, China and North Korea will also be helping Iran if the USA attacks Iran. This had been Putin's warning for a long time.
North Korea now says that it will never de-nuclearize, looking at the Israeli attack on Iran. Iran on the other hand has now openly indicated that getting the bomb is now its priority.
Anonymous
Now the narrative has exposed the thinking that Israel's strike on Iran's nuclear facilities is going to prevent Iran from ever getting the bomb. The new narrative is that the present attack will 'only slow down Iran's march towards possession of the bomb by two to three years'.
ReplyDeleteNot being an expert, may I be allowed to say, that with Iran's capability and its mindset focused on making the possession of the bomb it's priority, the time frame could be shorter than that. So, is the present scenario going to be repeated again and again to prevent Iran from going nuclear? To reach that stage, some country is going to disappear from the face of the earth if that is to happen.
There is growing concern in the West that Israel cannot hold out much longer with its stockpile of interceptor missiles which are not going to last another two weeks of Iranian assault, with Iran now using hypersonic missiles that are incapable of being stopped. Of what use are more interceptors that cannot realistically intercept those hypersonic missiles?
Having said that, making more missiles to replenish those expended is not just a problem for Israel, with even the USA, that is coming to its aid, facing similar issues. Without rare earth elements in enough quantities due to Chinese sanctions, the situation looks dire. Would the use of nuclear weapons be next on the cards by Israel? Putin has warned Israel already that it will step in if Iran is facing USA direct attack.
One by one, each of Trump's appointees are going to be thrown under the bus. Pete Hegseth is almost there with his dirty laundry exposed by one Senator. The character destruction of Pete Hegseth by a senator was total.
ReplyDeleteI do not think Tulsi Gabbard is going to take Trump's insult lying down. Trump openly insulted her by saying 'I do not care what she says', even though she is his National Intelligence pick. Why need her to take charge of National Intelligence if her advice means nothing? Elon Musk should have closed the National Intelligence Unit before his departure.