The
government-appointed "Expert Committee", being paid by the government,
said on Monday that there is no evidence that inactivated virus vaccines
demonstrate higher efficacy against COVID-19 variants than messenger
RNA (mRNA)-based vaccines.
"We have noted social media
messages asserting that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective
against (variants of concern) and that inactivated virus COVID-19
vaccines would provide superior protection.
The inactivated virus
COVID-19 vaccines have variable protection and there is currently no
evidence to suggest that inactivated virus vaccines demonstrate higher
vaccine efficacy against (variants of concerns) than the mRNA vaccines," said the Expert Committee in a press release on Monday.
The
two vaccines being used for the current National Vaccination Program
are from Pfizer-BioNtec and Modena. These vaccines use a new technology
mRNA instead of the traditional method of using inactivated viruses.
Curiously
and interestingly, the two new tech, untried and experimental Western
vaccines have been recommended by the "Expert Committee" who have
probably studied in the West or indoctrinated by the West, and were
quickly and readily accepted by the Multi-Ministry Task Force, who might
also studied in Western universities and brain-washed by Western
indoctrination.
In the other hand, the Sinovac vaccine uses the
traditional, tried and tested method as the vaccine used for chickenpox
for the last 100 years. It uses inactivated viruses. This is the
preferred vaccine by many old folks of Singapore, that the "Expert
Committee" not only did not recommend for inclusion into the National
Vaccination Program but seems to be attempting to run it down by saying
there is no evidence to show it is better. Such approach can only
discredit the so-called "Experts" themselves for being ingenious,
unethical and unprofessional.
Moreover, no evidence collected,
collated, processed, interpreted or used does not mean there is no
evidence out there in the cyberspace and in the world of 193 countries.
It simply means the "Experts" themselves
1. Have not come across such evidence.
2. Have disregarded such evidence.
3. Have preconceived ideas.
4. Have to safeguard self-image and protect the image of the MMTF.
5. Have made a great blunder.
Remember, the same "Expert Committee" has recommended to the government and the government has told all of us:
"YOU DO NOT NEED TO WEAR MASK IF YOU ARE NOT SICK. WEAR MASK ONLY IF YOU ARE UNWELL".
Last but not least, there is also no evidence for us to think that what
the few gentlemen in the appointed "Expert Committee" said are more
credible and trustworthy than what the myriads of people said in the
social media, out there in the Cyberspace!
SSO - 8 June 2021.
Obviously, the Expurts Comedians are trying very hard to protect their own position and reputation because they are the ones who have recommended the use of the highly questionable, experimental vaccines from Pfizer-BioN-tec and Moderna.
ReplyDeleteMoreover, it is known that Temasek Holdings has invested heavily on the Bio-N-tec. So, it seems that investment interests of Temasek Holdings must have been a factor of deep consideration, not just medical consideration.
The way the Expurts Comedians are running down the traditional method in favour of a new, unknown, untried, not-properly-tested, experimental and potentially problematic method of producing vaccines shows that they are a bunch of very bias and unprofessional salesmen.
A good salesman does not run down the competitors' products. A good salesman will only do his best to prove that his products is safe and superior by providing facts and data, testimonials from users and historical records.
A bad, unprofessional, unethical and unscrupulous salesman will run down his competitors' products through back-stabbing, conjectures, make-believes, twisting of facts and personal biases.
The more they try to run down the traditional methods, the more we should become suspicious of their ulterior motive.
I don't think it is the investment in BioNTech that matters as the Singapore market is too small to be meaningful to ban other vaccines being used here.
ReplyDeleteThe unspoken reason is more powerful and the boys and girls are like being coerced, not just influenced, to make silly decisions against their commonsense and against the interest of the common good. Look at the garbage being used in the main media to run down other vaccines and to support a controversial new vaccines that could prove fatal in the long run.
This long run expectation and fear are not just imaginary but due to the playing with fire, ie DNA. This is a genuine reason to want to be cautious as we do not want crocodile man or batman in the future.
The silly expurts got the gumption to rubbish this as unduly warranted fear. Such attitude is highly irresponsible to come from the mouths of scientists.
No data no evidence doesn't mean it's no good. Look at the old days in China using of Chinese herbs & TCM, they didn't make use of data or evidences but their sickness were cured. They don't even use computer scanning, X ray, blood tests etc but they could detect diseases just by using their 3 fingers. In high mountainous regions there can find many roots or herbs some r rare that absorbs the essence of nature these rare species of herbs could use to cure rare diseases & increase the immune systems (do they need data or evidences ?).
ReplyDeleteIt is like Biden telling his staff, oops, Biden's keepers saying, the agenda is to demonise China. So all you twits, go and dig whatever you can find to smear China. If you can't find anything, fabricate, lie, twist and turn, just do it. No body would know what is going on or know the truth. Just keep talking about it.
ReplyDeleteWhoever calls himself expert is no expert. A real expert does not call himself expert nor wants to be called an expert.
ReplyDeleteLKY said, "When you tell the lies often enough, they become the truths" or words to that effect.
ReplyDeleteWhen scientists become professional liars, instead of professional scientists, the World must be coming to the End.
These so-called "experts" are sticking their necks out on the chopping board.
ReplyDeleteI don't think we need long to wait before we can see the horrendous consequences of being the guinea-pigs in the mass vaccination experiment.
The only obstacle is the covering-up of adverse reports, which are now being classified as Confidential, Secret and Top Secret.
The non-revelation clause of the sales-purchase agreement insisted by the Pfizer and Moderna businessmen must give rise to suspicion that they will do their utmost to cover-up as much bad news as possible.
What we need, therefore, is whistle-blower from within. Al that is required to save the world is a few good men, like Edward Snowden and Julian Assange.
When they do not want you to know the truth, be frighten, be very frighten.
ReplyDeleteThe 55-year old man who died the next day after injected with Pfizer or Moderna vaccines has been curiously declared by an independent panel, instead of a Corona Inquiry, as died of heart attack instead of death caused by the mRNA toxins that caused the heart attack.
ReplyDeleteIs that an attempt in covering up? I believe it is. Common sense analysis and intuitive perception tell me that that poor man had died of heart attack caused by the Experimental mRNA Vaccine.
The spike protein (used by the mRNA vaccines) of the coronavirus has been discovered to be a toxin and, when injected into the body, it can enter the blood stream and cause blood clot, heart attack, stroke, multiple organs failure and reproductive system problems.
ReplyDeleteSo, don't play play.
Sit tight and cross your fingers if you have been injected with the toxic vaccines.
Disinformation and misinformation seem to be part of a concerted campaign to hookwink the unaware and ill-informed general public.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how much money have changed hands?
How many hands have been taking the honey?
Unpad's Sinovac Researchers Say Sinovac May Require 3rd Shot as Booster
ReplyDeleteRirie Ranggasari
TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - A team of researchers for the Covid-19 vaccine by Sinovac from Padjadjaran's University (Unpad) Faculty of Medicine is compiling a final report on clinical trials in Bandung. They plan to submit the report to the Food and Drug Administration (BPOM) through PT Bio Farma as the research sponsor in mid-June.
"[From] the result, it seems that further researches are needed to determine the persistent antibody and booster," the research team's manager Eddy Fadlyana said on Wednesday, 9 June.
A booster is a third dose of Sinovac's inactivated vaccine to boost the antibody against the new coronavirus. "For efficacy, there might be a decrease, as the antibody response also decreases on its own. Therefore a booster is required," Eddy said.
The latest research by the vaccine producer in China, Eddy said, said that a third shot is advised. "The trial showed that the antibody response increases by tenfold," he said.
The research team in Bandung is preparing to conduct a similar trial. As requested by the WHO, the team will do a follow-up research for six months starting after the volunteers in the follow-up clinical trials get their second doses.
The research plan is currently awaiting approval from BPOM and the Unpad Ethics Committee, after the final report of the first nine-month clinical trial is submitted this month.
The final report, Eddy said, will also be used to seek permission for the permanent use of the Sinovac vaccine in Indonesia. So far, the BPOM had only issued permits for emergency use, which was on January 11 this year.
Anwar Siswadi (Contributor)
https://en.tempo.co/read/1470766/unpads-sinovac-researchers-say-sinovac-may-require-3rd-shot-as-booster
RB,
ReplyDeleteAnti-China CIA spy is posting China-Demonising and smearing sites again, as part of the $300 million per year Demonising China Propaganda Campaign.
Both Pfizer and Moderna Require 3rd Shot - From The Horses' Mouths
ReplyDeletePfizer CEO Albert Bourla said people will "likely" need a booster dose of a Covid-19 vaccine within 12 months of getting fully vaccinated. His comments were made public Thursday but were taped April 1.
Bourla said it's possible people will need to get vaccinated against the coronavirus annually.
"A likely scenario is that there will be likely a need for a third dose, somewhere between six and 12 months and then from there, there will be an annual revaccination, but all of that needs to be confirmed. And again, the variants will play a key role," he told CNBC's Bertha Coombs during an event with CVS Health.
"It is extremely important to suppress the pool of people that can be susceptible to the virus," Bourla said.
The comment comes after Johnson & Johnson CEO Alex Gorsky told CNBC in February that people may need to get vaccinated against Covid-19 annually, just like seasonal flu shots.
Researchers still don't know how long protection against the virus lasts once someone has been fully vaccinated.
Pfizer said earlier this month that its Covid-19 vaccine was more than 91% effective at protecting against the coronavirus and more than 95% effective against severe disease up to six months after the second dose. Moderna's vaccine, which uses technology similar to Pfizer's, was also shown to be highly effective at six months.
Pfizer's data was based on more than 12,000 vaccinated participants. However, researchers say more data is still needed to determine whether protection lasts after six months.
Earlier Thursday, the Biden administration's Covid response chief science officer, David Kessler, said Americans should expect to receive booster shots to protect against coronavirus variants.
Kessler told U.S. lawmakers that currently authorized vaccines are highly protective but noted new variants could "challenge" the effectiveness of the shots.
"We don't know everything at this moment," he told the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis.
"We are studying the durability of the antibody response," he said. "It seems strong but there is some waning of that and no doubt the variants challenge ... they make these vaccines work harder. So I think for planning purposes, planning purposes only, I think we should expect that we may have to boost."
In February, Pfizer and BioNTech said they were testing a third dose of their Covid-19 vaccine to better understand the immune response against new variants of the virus.
Late last month, the National Institutes of Health started testing a new Covid vaccine from Moderna in addition to the one it already has, designed to protect against a problematic variant first found in South Africa.
Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel told CNBC on Wednesday that the company hopes to have a booster shot for its two-dose vaccine available in the fall.
COVID-19 Vaccines: Is It Possible To Make Big Fortunes Forever?
ReplyDeleteYes, if the masses are made to become vaccine-addicts and have to take the same or booster vaccines every year or every six months.
While it still remains unclear how long immunity from coronavirus vaccines and natural infection lasts, vaccine developers are racing to test and determine if their shots will eventually require an extra dose or booster shot to maintain protection against COVID-19.
The latest information on booster shots comes from Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel, who said the company will make a third booster vaccine available to Americans by the fall. The Moderna vaccine currently requires two doses in order to be effective.
The purpose of a third shot is to boost immunity for COVID-19 as more contagious coronavirus variants continue to spread in the world, some of which have been shown to evade the shots’ defenses.
Results from a preclinical study showed that a modified version of the original Moderna vaccine designed to tackle the variant that emerged in South Africa was capable of increasing antibody levels in those who already received two doses. Previous data revealed the variant lowered antibody levels by 600% in laboratory tests.
The Moderna booster news comes a week after Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said during a CVS Health livestream that it seems “likely” people who received the Pfizer vaccine will need a third dose “somewhere between six and 12 months, and then from there, there would be an annual re-vaccination.” (This looks like big money in the making forever).
“But all of that needs to be confirmed, and again, the variants will play a key role,” Bourla added.
Pfizer’s chief medical officer told CNBC that she agrees with Bourla.
“We see indications for this also in the induced, but also the natural immune response against SARS-COV-2 [the virus that causes COVID-19],” Dr. Ozlem Tureci told the outlet.
"We see this waning of immune responses also in people who were just infected, and therefore [it’s] expected with the vaccines.”
Dr. Anthony Fauci, President Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser, said we’ll likely know by this fall whether booster COVID-19 vaccines will be necessary.
“When the slope starts coming down you can predict when you’re going to get below the safe level or you could start seeing breakthrough infections,” Fauci said Sunday on ABC’s ‘This Week’.
“I believe by the time we get to the end of the summer and the beginning of the fall, we’ll have a pretty good idea of whether we definitely or not need to give people boosts and when we need to give it to them.”
The reality for COVID-19 vaccines will likely mirror that of flu shots, which require annual vaccinations that are updated by scientists each year depending on which strain of the influenza virus is circulating.
Johnson & Johnson CEO Alex Gorsky also told CNBC in February that coronavirus vaccines may need to be an annual event.
Both Pfizer and Moderna announced that their vaccines offer protection against COVID-19 for six months. This means that every six months one has to re-vaccinate again and again and again.
That means every six months, doctors and Vaccine Producers, the Profit-Motivated Big Pharmaceutical Companies are going to keep increasing their wealths and fortunes at the expense of the poor vaccine-ransomed masses.
How cunning can some greedy people be!
So, the solution to the probability of being swindled by these traps is to take the Chinese vaccines instead of the Vaccines from Profit-Generated Wealth-Building Ineffective and Inefficient Vaccines masquerading as the Best Vaccines in the World. But actually is a trap to entice the masses into Stupidity Cannot Cure.
ReplyDeleteAll of us had been vaccinated before. Our children, grandchildren also have been vaccinated. How many times do they need to be vaccinated for each disease? Maximum twice.
ReplyDeleteWhy are these vaccines now need 3 times may be 4 or more? What kind of vaccines are these and how effective or ineffective are they?
The way vaccines work with our bodies is to prepare our bodies to recognise the virus and subsequently can deal with it when they entered our body again. Once vaccinated, our body are prepared and ready for further attacks.
Unless the virus has mutated to a unrecognisable form in the future that our body is unable to know them. For the moment all the variants are very similar to the original or earlier virus and should not pose a problem to our body. At least for a couple of years, the virus would not have turned into bats or cats to be completely unrecognisable.
All the talks about 3 or more or infinite number of jabs surely did not sound right.
Sinovac, Pfizer/BioNtech COVID-19 vaccines prove highly effective in Uruguay -government
ReplyDeleteUruguay on Tuesday released real-world data on the impact of Sinovac Biotech's (SVA.O) COVID-19 vaccine among its population that showed it was over 90% effective in preventing intensive care admissions and deaths.
The shot reduced deaths by 95% and intensive care admissions by 92%, and also showed 61% efficacy in cutting coronavirus infections, the government said.
The government also studied the effectiveness of the Pfizer/BioNTech (PFE.N), vaccine among 162,047 health workers and people over 80 years old. The shot was 94% effective at preventing intensive care unit admissions and deaths, and reduced infections by 78%, the report said.
Inactivated vaccines like Sinovac and Sinopharm are not as effective against infection but very effective against severe disease,” said Ben Cowling, an epidemiologist and biostatistician at the University of Hong Kong School of Public Health.
ReplyDeleteRB,
ReplyDeleteThe sneaky Australia-CIA Spy Matlilah, the Anti-China Pest is on it again.
Posting the same shits repeatedly to smear China again.
SCMP is a well-known China-bashing news tabloid known to have been infiltrated by MI6 and Canadian Agents, is now wholly owned by Jack Ma, who has an axe to grind against the Chinese Government for destroying his biggest scam on Earth.
Indiatoday is another Anti-China tabloid that has been known to spout shits against China all the time.
These two news outlets are totally unreliable when reporting anything on China.
India's Covid-19 death toll breaks world record, after one state revised its death records to the highest in the country.
ReplyDeleteThis gives rise to many experts saying that India could be at least ten times the infections and death tolls of what that have been reported in the past.
The real figures could be the world's highest, making the US's Covid Casualties numbers pale in comparison.
RB, you should delete all the sham reports that Matlilah has managed to sneak in while you are resting.
ReplyDeleteOk, done.
ReplyDelete