Reading the western media, especially from their political commentators and even govt officials, one cannot get away from the notion that the Canadians are so angelic, so innocent, just like little boys and girls, in the arrest and harsh treatment of an innocent Chinese lady while transiting Vancouver airport. She was arrested not because she committed a crime. The Canadians knew that she was innocent. But they have to arrest her and subjected her to treatments befitting a hard core criminal, under the pretext of rule of law. The Canadians lived by the rule of law. And they are having a great time enjoying the arrest of Meng.
So, under what rule of law did they arrest Meng Wanzhou? Oh, they have an extradition treaty with the Americans. So when the Americans told them to arrest Meng Wanzhou, a Chinese national who did not commit any crimes, they did so, because that was the rule of law, arresting an innocent citizen of another country also can. There is no other condition attached to such extradition treaty? Of course there are. The person being arrested must have committed a crime, and the request must not be politically motivated or for any other reasons than committing a crime.
Did the boys and girls in the Canada govt know that the arrest of Meng Wanzhou was politically motivated, a kidnapping of another country's citizen to be used as a bargaining chip, to shut Huawei out of the western market? No they did not know. Really, the children did not know. And that is true. How could a little girl made Foreign Minister, and a little boy PM know the difference between a crime and rule of law and a political and commercial plot schemed by the thugs in Washington? They could not have known. They only know how to play with their toys, and if the thugs in Washington told them to arrest an innocent citizen from another country, little innocent and ignorant boys and girls have to believe the Americans were doing it because of a crime committed, and because of the rule of law.
So everyday they uttered about the rule of law and nothing else, like all innocent boys and girls trained to do, it is the rule of law, it is the rule of law, Canada is a rule of law country. China has no rule of law, so China arrested the two intelligence operators is lawless, did not obey any rule of law. The two Canadians arrested in China are also innocent boys that did nothing wrong and China is behaving like thugs to arrest them without observing the rule of law. They could not see anything wrong with what the two Canadians were doing in China, sooooo innocent.
What if there were evidence that the Americans were lying to them, that the arrest of Meng was a politically motivated ploy, that she was a bargaining chip in the China trade war and trade negotiation? No, cannot be, the arrest was a rule of law thing. What about the American President saying that he would intervene to set her free if this could end up making a trade deal with China in the interest of the Americans? Is this not clear enough that there is nothing about a crime or about the rule of law? Now that Trump had said it in front of the media and shown to the whole world, what did the little girl do? She pleaded with Trump not to politicise it. She used the word 'politicise' because she knew. But if Trump would to listen to her and keep quiet henceforth, she and other little boys and girls could continue with their lie that it is not politics but the rule of law. And these children can live happily with that like nothing happened at all.
What the American President said was just what he said, nothing to affect 'the rule of law' arrest of Meng. The little boys and girls in Canada only want to believe that they were playing a game of rule of law and anything else they would not hear, could not understand. This is what you will get when a govt is run by a bunch of innocent and ignorant little brats. They believed that they were doing all the right things and China was doing all the wrong things.
They are so innocent, so cute and so naive, they could not have done anything wrong about wrongful arrest of an innocent citizen of another country or ill treating her and violating her human rights. When would these vicious little brats wake up from the world of childish make beliefs? It is the American's fault, not the Canadians. They just arrest Meng because the Americans asked them, nothing to do with them. Oh, so cute!
18 comments:
The US President is the highest office in America, and he already has said Meng might be used as a bargaining chip in trade negotiations.
How can they rebut the highest office ?
The little white children can do no evil. The great white God will forgive them or look the other way.
Uncle Sam forced its lackey (Canada) to kidnap Sabrina Meng in order to ask China to pay ransom. If China yielded, it is no different from negotiating with terrorists. Western media call it an arrest. That’s an insult to law. It’s just a political abduction. Uncle Sam is behaving like a rogue state. Canada is complicit. Little Canada has shot itself not in the foot but between its thighs for siding Uncle Sam who is losing in a trade and tech war against China. Trump will soon be getting lonelier as more and more countries see the true colours of Uncle Sam trade war intentions. Its allies including Canada will no longer trust Uncle Sam with its "America First" policy.
The white men still think they can gang up against China like in the past.
Today's China will hit back, one at a time.
uncle rb
where are your fans?
very very quiet here leh!
gone holiday?
hahaha........
RB fans all still around, just that we are careful what we comment, else kena fixed !
Hi 223pm
Sometimes.....even very very careful....oso can kena lim-kopi.
Whether lucky or not!
Correct?
Shane Todd die.
Meng die already?
Aucoin sack. Not Bitcoin hor. Is Aucoin. Feng Shui got pre warn you a not? Tell you is "Au" Coin, Lousy Coin? Now Bitcoin what rate ah? Where is feng shui master or religion master?
6 smoke bomb is Chinese kill Chinese? Sack already?
Ang Moh Ang Moh Ang Moh.
When you all want to type story, need to see same same to same same? Shane Todd and Meng Wanzhou is consider same same to same same a not ah?
North Vietnam vs South Vietnam? North Korea vs South Korea? Whose problem? Ang Moh or Chinese? After seeing Shane Todd and Meng Wanzhou, I am thinking why my ancestor run road ah?
Since the President of the USA has openly said to the media that he can intervene to release Sabrina Meng from Canada's kidnappers, then the judges, legal professionals and the judiciary of Canada must be under the beck and call of the USA President (favour, threat or bribe). Therefore, it can be concluded that there must be prior collusion and coordination before Sabrina Meng's kidnapping (through the use of the ultra-legal process). It can be assumed that the CIA agents must have been very busy monitoring the movements of the top executives of top Chinese officials and business enterprises.
This has marked the beginning of a different Global Order (Disorder). China, Russia and the rest of the countries being bullied by the Evil US Empire under the MAD (Mad and Dangerous) US President must come together to retaliate and exert their positions. If not, this MAD Dog, suffering from rabbis, might become even more mad and dangerous to the entire human race.
It is time to act. Not time to talk and talk and talk.
President Xi Jinping has declared that China is not seeking to dominate. This kind of talk is totally unnecessary. It is another indication of naive and poor leadership. The problem is not to dominate or not. The real problem is that there is in existence a rogue and Evil Empire run by evil so-called leaders, bent on creating existential difficulties, problems and obstacles to China and other countries that have inexperienced and naive leaders.
If there is an action, there must be a reaction. Actions must be met by counter-actions. Actions cannot be met by talks, talks, and talks (just like farting hot airs).
The reputation, integrity, dignity and survival of the Chinese People are at stake, irrespective of being dominating or not. If fact, the right thing to do for China is to openly seek to dominate. Announcing China 2025 just for fun? If the US has been openly and shamelessly seeking to dominate, then other countries too should do so, if they are able to.
You do not seek to dominate because you are not able to. If in all your endeavours, you are seeking to be better and better than other people/organisations/countries, then saying that China does not seek to dominate is frivolous, meaningless, naive and stupid.
Tell the silly girl in Canada that Washington is not politicising the case. The case is political from the start. So stop pretending that it is not, stop pretending that she is innocent, stop pretending that Canada is innocent and following the rule of law.
This is lawlessness.
The Chinese government will try to solve the Sabrina Meng imbroglio without any negative impact on the Chinese economy. But for the Evil Five-eye alliance headed by Uncle Sam, its impact will be far more profound. The most direct impact is that the Chinese people will have completely lost goodwill and trust in them. Chinese leaders are not hot-headed firebrands and do not act in haste. They are taking a wait-and-see break while Uncle Sam and its Canadian poodle conspire and conjure their next move. Should Sabrina Meng end up in Uncle Sam's prison, all bets are off. China leaders are probably ready with a Plan B in anticipation of the next crisis.
All plans lead to war!!!
So buy war stocks!!!!
Even if no war, all countries will spend trillions to pump up their war toys.
Just ask Pinky!!
What for you only pay taxes & fees for cronies to enjoy war toys?!?
At least earn back your money thru dividends & long term capital gains from war stocks!!!
Neither Uncle Sam nor China will push each other into a tight corner such that the only solution left is war. The only winner of the war will be Russia as both countries will be devastated. The Sabrina Meng saga will come to an amicable closure, much to the satisfaction of every party concerned. There is no existential threat to the 3 countries involved. The core interests of China are not challenged. Neither is Uncle Sam's hegemony being eroded. The vicissitudes in relations between 2 strong powers do not warrant a war.
The current conflict between the world's two largest economic powers, US and China, has its roots in Singapore and Israel.
The fact is Huawei n big Chinese n MNC tech firms are being hit n will be hit by jealous US & gang. Wealth destruction follows by recession/ depression n then war. Its going to be a very terrible world to live when that happens. War with such level of nuclear n chemical n military firepower. Pray that wisdom prevails n prevent this escalating scenario.
Usa has 7000 nuclear bombs if used on China, not only China will be totally destroyed, the whole earth is destroyed. China has 300 bombs so part of USA will be destroyed. So China can not destroyed USA totally but USA can destroyed China and the whole earth totally. The Chinese race may be ended except the overseas Chinese if earth is not destroyed.😰😰😰
Chance of any lottery win need to times every second
Passed.that will be the actual chance out come.
Post a Comment