4/14/2018

Syria - The evil men and women just did it

The United States, Britain and France launched punitive military strikes against Bashar al-Assad's The evil men and women just did it. They attacked Syria with bomb strikes. They have no qualm, apprehension or hesitation when comes to bombing and killing Arabs and Muslims. Based on a fabricated and alleged chemical weapons, just like the WMD farce, they quickly launched a military attack, to save the asses in ISIS, their attack dogs from being wiped out by the govt forces of Assad and Russia. They are desperate to save their attack dogs and cannot wait for a second longer. They hit. They defied the UN and went ahead without any approval from the UN. This is how the murderers behaved when they are desperate.

So far no news of Russia responding. If Russia did not act, if Putin did not act, it would be the end of Russian presence in the Middle East. The evil men and women are adamant and trigger free simply because they know that they can hit at the Arabs/Muslim states and the latter could not hit back. Now they are taking the chances on Putin and Russia not hitting back. They are reckless, they took a big gamble that the Russians would not hit back.

They would have done the same thing to North Korea if Kim did not have nuclear weapons and the means to hit back. It is the same case as Iran. Both North Korea and Iran must learn from this incident, that they must not give up their weapons and the ability to strike back. Or they would be like the Arab/Muslim states, bombed to Stone Age, at the mercy of the evil men and women of the evil Empire and Europe.

This is also a lesson for Russia and China, that they cannot afford to appear weak as the evil men and women would think it is ok to strike. 

Here are a few paragraph from Yahoo News on the military strike.


"Shortly after Trump began a White House address to announce the action, large explosions were heard in the Syrian capital Damascus, signalling a new chapter in a brutal seven-year-old civil war.
"A short time ago, I ordered the United States armed forces to launch precision strikes on targets associated with the chemical weapons capabilities of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad," Trump said in a primetime televised speech to the nation.
"A combined operation with the armed forces of France and the United Kingdom is now under way. We thank them both. This massacre was a significant escalation in a pattern of chemical weapons use by that very terrible regime."
A US official said the strikes had targeted chemical production facilities. Another official said multiple types of bombs were used, and a variety of targets chosen.
Trump also warned Russia and Iran not to stand by their ally in Damascus."

When are you Putin? Did the Russians hit back? How was the air defence of Syria with Russian defence system? Apparently they were not able to prevent the missiles from hitting their targets. How many civilians would become war collateral? It would be a shame if Putin did nothing. He should pack up and go home.

19 comments:

Chua Chin Leng aka redbean said...

Just watch the news in CNA and seeing how these evil men and women pretending to be angels, speaking slowly and calmly to justify the bombing and killings of Syrians using the most basic and stupid lie that Assad used chemical weapons to kill his people. Assad is winning against the rebels and ISIS and has no reason to rush to use chemical weapons. He is on the winning side and not desperate to do anything silly.

The evil men and women came across as a wolf pack, a band of gangsters so proud to be fighting hand in hand against a weak and poorly armed Assad govt.

And they are trying to con the world that they are the good guys and Assad and his people are the bad guys. And the whole world, the UN, are hapless to the vicious attack by these 3 rogue countries and their evil leaders.

It is so fun, so easy to conduct wars and to kill the Arabs and Muslims that could hardly hit back, based on an allegation fabricated by them.

This is fake news 1.01.

Anonymous said...

UK and France are not so big countries but act like superpowers only because they possess nuclear weapons with the nod of the US for white-men countries.

Ⓜatilah $ingapura⚠️ said...

Putin knows how much to allocate, and to not assuage his ego. He cannot win this fight. Oil revenues are down, trade sanctions against Russia...but Russia financially quite strong: Lowest debt to GDP ratio in Europe!

How much is Putin willing to spend in defending his "friend"? I would say, he'll have a limit on that. Arguably one of the richest men in the world, he's not a bloody fool when it comes to money. Why risk the cuntry's finances just for the sake of "ego"?

And in the end, fuck Assad lah. He started the shit as a dictator, let him deal with his rebellious people, and the other Arabs who don't like him---which are probably the majority. None of them (maybe Iran) are helping him---they've all isolated and abandoned Syria.

Saudi Arabia, for e.g. can't wait for Assad to fall. Assad has no friends...Russia is is so-called "friend"...for the moment.

Gone case lah.

Anonymous said...

Fox News host Tucker Carlson has slammed so-called "geniuses" who claim to know the truth behind the alleged chemical attack.

Speaking on his television show on Monday, Carlson spoke of the alleged attack in the Damascus suburb of Douma. However, he noted that while "genius" politicians, media, intelligence services, and think tanks seem to blame Syrian President Bashar Assad for the attack, they don't actually know what happened on the ground

"All the geniuses tell us that Assad killed those children, but do they really know that? Of course they don't really know that. They're making it up. They have no real idea what happened," Carlson said.

"Actually both sides in the Syrian civil war possess chemical weapons," he said, noting that it wouldn't have benefited Assad to use chlorine gas, since his forces have been winning the war in Syria.

He also discussed last year's sarin gas attack which the majority of US leaders also blamed on Assad. "But of course they were lying," he said, noting that US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis admitted two months ago that there is still no proof that Assad used sarin last year. Carlson called the story "propaganda."

Chua Chin Leng aka redbean said...

House Speaker Paul Ryan is praising Trump’s “decisive action in coordination with our allies,” adding, “We are united in our resolve.”

Senate Armed Service Committee Chairman John McCain is applauding the airstrikes but says “they alone will not achieve U.S. objectives in the Middle East.”

Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer is calling the airstrikes “appropriate,” but says “the administration has to be careful about not getting us into a greater and more involved war in Syria.”

The evil men in Washington are so delirious with the air strike. Just wait for the black plastic bags to come home when the Russians hit back. Russia has no choice but to hit back. The evil men and women have just given Putin a tight slap and he has no where to hide but to strike back. Putin is not going to turn the other cheek.

The evil men and women have just stirred the hornet's nest. There won't be laughters and cheerings when American boys and girls come home in black plastic bags.

rex said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Would the Russians live up to their words that they would hit back at where the strikes were launched? If they do, then the submarines and destroyers and Cyprus where the Tornadoes were launched would be hit.

Anonymous said...

In carrying out airstrikes in Syria on Saturday, the U.S. and its allies were trying to maintain a careful balance: upholding their red line against the use of chemical weapons, without crossing Moscow's red lines against toppling President Bashar al-Assad or targeting Russian forces.

The attack was larger than President Donald Trump's previous strike against Syria in April 2017. About twice as many bombs were dropped, compared with last year. And this time, the U.S. didn't go it alone but carried out the attacks along with its British and French allies.

But the attack was narrowly focused, seeking to cripple Mr. Assad's chemical-weapons infrastructure without triggering a broader conflict with Russia and Iran.

Complicating the mission was Syria's decision to move some of its combat planes to airfields that were occupied by Russian forces.

For the U.S. and its allies, the solution was to strike three targets, including a scientific research center in Damascus and a weapons-storage site west of Homs where no Russians were believed to be present.

The U.S. didn't notify the Russians about the targets, but it reduced the risk of a clash with the Russian air force by letting their commanders know what airspace American and allied forces would be using -- a process the Pentagon dubs "deconfliction."

The effort to avoid a clash with Russian forces appeared to succeed. The Pentagon said it didn't detect the firing of any Russian surface-to-air missiles, though Syrian surface-to-air missile batteries were fired.

Still, the limited nature of the military intervention is likely to yield only limited gains, experts said.

Anonymous said...

Israel , look no further....



Quote,

” The Disinformer’s Gambit

THE GOLDEN RULE OF DISINFORMERS:
Always accuse your adversary of whatever is true about yourself.

——————————–

I mentioned Disinformers,
and
Look who takes offense, and pops in, to comment.
I did not mention anyone’s name,
but apparently someone feels that this is about them.

It is safe to conclude that if one were to throw a rock into a pen full of pigs,
and one of them squealed,
that the one that squealed,
would be the one that you had hit.
Who is it that says that this “shoe fits”?
It is a good puppy, who comes when he is called. ”


The link,
The Disinformer’s Gambit – Google Groups
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.activism.militia/3JByaOVzgTA

Forget about Gaza, bomb Assad! Israeli hawks urge US to strike Syria ...
https://www.rt.com/news/423532-israel-syria-strike-us/

These are the Israeli leaders who want to destroy al-Aqsa | The ...
https://electronicintifada.net/content/these-are-israeli-leaders-who-want-destroy-al-aqsa/21166

Donald Trump: Jerusalem is off negotiating table | Trump News | Al ...
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/02/trump-jerusalem-negotiation-table-180212052249924.html

The West Bank Rises Up | Middle East Research and ... - Merip
http://www.merip.org/mer/mer152/west-bank-rises

How Salisbury case went from local drama to international incident ...
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/10/salisbury-poisoning-sergei-skripal-local-news-international-incident

Israeli Military Kills 15 Palestinians in Confrontations on Gaza Border ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/30/world/middleeast/gaza-israel-protest-clashes.html



Anonymous said...

When are you Putin? Did the Russians hit back?
RB

If the Russians did not hit back, they must have their good reasons not to hit back.

And perhaps for the same good reasons why smart Sinkies did not want to join the Sinkie opposition to hit PAP.

Anonymous said...

Quote,

" Rules of political misdirection

Magician's rules of misdirection:

1. The spectator's eye will look where the magician looks.
2. Use a broad motion to cover another motion you wish to conceal.
3. Keep the audience occupied with patter and direct their attention....
...........................
Note: It's important to realize that political performance is primarily for the home audience - it's not essential for the other side (the enemy) to buy into the viewpoints being peddled - but it is important to sell these at home in order to obtain acquiescence or at least limit domestic resistance to a particular policy or course of action. (The other side (the enemy) will be handled through other, more 'vigorous' means.) The homefront is key as it's through domestic movements that resistance to a particular policy or action might emerge. So, limiting the effectiveness of that resistance is crucial. ...."



The link,
Rules of political misdirection - Islam from Inside
http://www.islamfrominside.com/Pages/Commentary/Rules%20of%20misdirection.html

Anonymous said...

Bring the EVIL to where its NEST is. People of the Free World, rise up and help those victimized by the rich, powerful, cruel, selfish, evil and lawless but pretend to champion the rule of law. Bring the war to where it belongs. Hit them back for once at their own homeland. Hit them nack at their basrs. Dish out to them what they deserve.

Anonymous said...

The facts cannot be distorted.

This military strike was not authorized by the UN, and the strikes targeted a legal government of a UN member state.

The US and its European allies launched strikes to punish President Bashar al-Assad for a suspected chemical attack in Duma last weekend. However, it has not been confirmed if the chemical weapons attack happened or if it did, whether government forces or opposition forces launched it. International organizations have not carried out any authoritative investigation.

The Syrian government has repeatedly stressed that there is no need for it to use chemical weapons to capture the opposition-controlled Duma city and the use of chemical weapons has provided an excuse for Western intervention.

The Syrian government's argument or Trump's accusations against the "evil" Assad regime, which one is in line with basic logic? The answer is quite obvious.

The US has a record of launching wars on deceptive grounds. The Bush government asserted the Saddam regime held chemical weapons before the US-British coalition troops invaded Iraq in 2003. However, the coalition forces didn't find what they called weapons of mass destruction after overthrowing the Saddam regime. Both Washington and London admitted later that their intelligence was false.

Washington's attack on Syria where Russian troops are stationed constitute serious contempt for Russia's military capabilities and political dignity.

Trump, like scolding a pupil, called on Moscow, one of the world's leading nuclear powers, to abandon its "dark path." Disturbingly, Washington seems to have become addicted to mocking Russia in this way. Russia is capable of launching a destructive retaliatory attack on the West. Russia's weak economy is plagued by Western sanctions and squeezing of its strategic space. That the West provokes Russia in such a manner is irresponsible for world peace.

Western countries continue bullying Russia but are seemingly not afraid of its possible counterattack. Their arrogance breeds risk and danger.

Virgo 49 said...


Grab more beer and peanuts.Good shows coming up.The Russians warned of consequences. Putin is a careful meticulous well planned military strategist.

Russians pilots on Syrian fighter planes gonna sink the Aircraft carriers soon.The Americunts kept repeating these are just wayang to try to frighten Missle Man Kim. They try to kill chicken just to frighten monkey.But Kim is a Korean Tiger.

Dotard Trump meeting him soon and just want to show their combined force. Russia with Iran and China gonna show their colours soon.

Toothless U.N. pee now in pants warned of open wars.

If USA is fighting ISIS, then now why on their side?? .They just throw an excuse to bomb Syria to show KIm





Chua Chin Leng aka redbean said...

The evil powers are treating the world and the Russians as fools. They alleged the chemical weapons and expect the world to accept it as truth. They claimed that they were doing precision strikes on chemical weapon sites. What were these sites, anyone know.

They claimed they told the Russians that they were going to strike Russian ally, Syria, and the Russians would allow them to do so. What did they take the Russians to be, idiots?

So they can go and hit Russian allies that Russia is supposed to be protecting and all is fine, Russia would not hit, would hide in a corner to let them hit Syria?

They tried the same silly trick with China, telling China that they would do a preemptive strike at N Korea and then go home. China showed them the middle finger and said if you start it China would fight on the side of N Korea.

And this strike against chemical weapons was preplanned with the rebels and ISIS, a coordinated attack on the Syrian govt. The rebels and ISIS were reported to counter attack while the missiles were landing, as part of a major military offensive.

What more jokes are the evil men and women going to crack to make the world believe in them, that the Russians and the rest of the world are fools, idiots, letting them say anything and do anything as they like?

Virgo 49 said...


Mr RB, just loved the lovely speech by Dotard Trump just repeated again on Fox News. The Evils of what's Assad Regime and other equally evil countries reflected on what the Americans had been terrorising the daft fools round the World that worshipped ans believe in them.

What's unforgivable evil use of chemicals on innocent women and children. They been using Agent Orange on the Vietnamese. The Japs had their Unit 731. Taiwan had Brothel 831 in Kinmen Island.

Loud which country would associate with this Evil country and Abe fully supported his actions.

You want Sarin Gas from my Unit 731 when we try them on the PRCs???

One hundred percent of his speech pointed fingers at the Evils of the Americans and the Japanese.

Anonymous said...

Syria Intercepted 71 Out of 103 missiles Fired: UK's May Under Fire For Not Seeking Parliament's Approval

U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May on Saturday faced heavy criticism that she should have sought Parliament's approval before joining the U.S. and France in attacking the Assad regime.

The Scottish National Party's Stephen Gethins told the British Broadcasting Corp. that joining the airstrikes without consulting Parliament was "extraordinarily disappointing."

Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn said the assault was "legally questionable." "Theresa May should have sought parliamentary approval, not trailed after Donald Trump," he said in a statement.

The adamant U.K. PM said the strikes were "both right and legal," adding that she would set out her case to lawmakers Monday.

Mrs. May said the U.K. and its allies are confident that the strikes in retaliation to what they said was an Assad-orchestrated chemical attack near Damascus were successful.

However, Russian news unit RT reported that, according to the Russian Ministry of Defense, Syrian air defense units managed to intercept 71 out of 103 of the missiles launched.

Anonymous said...

Who thing much can the Russian do as none of the Russian or their assets were hit so how to retaliate? The most aggressive person in USA is the Bengalis woman at the UN apparently she was the one most aggressive asking DT to bomb Syria to Stone Age.

Ⓜatilah $ingapura⚠️ said...

@ all

1. Putin won't attack because the "allies" haven't attacked Russian forces. If he does, that's an act of war

2. Putin is very smart, and emotionally secure. He won't be destroying his cuntry's economy by going to war defending a "friend".

3. At the end of the day, Syria is a basket case. The other Arabs hate them. Turkey hates them. Iran ok friend...for the moment. I doubt Putin will play a losing game for Assad.